Literature DB >> 22309291

Hand hygiene practices of veterinary support staff in small animal private practice.

R K Nakamura1, E Tompkins, E L Braasch, J G Martinez, D Bianco.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the hand hygiene (HH) practices among veterinary technicians (VT) and veterinary support staff (VSS) in small animal private practice.
METHODS: This was a prospective questionnaire-based study involving 182 VT and VSS from 18 small animal hospitals in the USA. Questions asked included gender, number of animals handled per work shift, frequency of hand washing, reason for not washing more frequently, most common available hand washing agent, education regarding the importance of HH and frequency of ring wearing.
RESULTS: Less than half of the respondents [76 of 182 (41·7%)] reported washing their hands regularly between handling patients and 154 of 182 (85·6%) believed they should have washed more frequently. The most commonly employed HH agent was hand soap [154 of 182 (84·6%)] and the most common reason cited for not washing more frequently was being too busy [132 of 182 (72·5%)]. Only 96 of 182 (52·7%) respondents were educated by doctors at their hospital regarding the importance of HH. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The HH practices among VT and VSS in small animal private practice is poor. Hand soap was the most commonly employed agent among respondents in this study. Education of VT and VSS regarding the importance of HH requires improvement.
© 2012 British Small Animal Veterinary Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22309291     DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.2011.01180.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Small Anim Pract        ISSN: 0022-4510            Impact factor:   1.522


  4 in total

1.  Self-reported hand hygiene perceptions and barriers among companion animal veterinary clinic personnel in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Maureen E C Anderson; J Scott Weese
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  A pre- and post-intervention study of infection control in equine hospitals in Sweden.

Authors:  Karin Bergström; Ulrika Grönlund
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 1.695

3.  Zoonotic disease risk perceptions in the British veterinary profession.

Authors:  Charlotte Robin; Judy Bettridge; Fiona McMaster
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 2.670

4.  Video observation of hand hygiene practices during routine companion animal appointments and the effect of a poster intervention on hand hygiene compliance.

Authors:  Maureen E C Anderson; Jan M Sargeant; J Scott Weese
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 2.741

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.