Literature DB >> 2230923

Functional organization within the medullary reticular formation of intact unanesthetized cat. I. Movements evoked by microstimulation.

T Drew1, S Rossignol.   

Abstract

1. The present article described the various patterns of movement evoked in the limbs and neck by microstimulation (33-ms trains, 330 Hz, 0.2-ms pulses at less than or equal to 35 microA) of the medullary reticular formation (MRF) of seven chronically implanted, unanesthetized, intact cats. Altogether 878 loci were stimulated in 83 penetrations. However, as stimulation in the more lateral regions of the MRF was less effective, the results are based on stimulation in 592 loci made in 56 penetrations at distances of between 0.5 and 2.5 mm lateral to the midline. 2. Of these 592 loci, movement of one or more parts of the body was evoked from a total of 539 (91%) sites. Most of these movements were compound in nature, involving movement of one or more limbs as well as the head. Discrete movements were observed only with respect to the head; limb movements were always accompanied by head movement. In addition, hindlimb movements were always accompanied by forelimb movements, although the inverse was generally not true. 3. The most common effects of the stimulation were as follows: a turning of the head to the ipsilateral side (79% of stimulated sites); flexion of the ipsilateral elbow (41%); and extension of the contralateral elbow (45%). Effects in the hindlimbs were more variable and less frequent, with the majority of the effective loci causing flexion of the ipsilateral knee (9%) together with extension of the contralateral knee (8%). In total, including both flexion and extension, 18% of the stimulated sites caused movement of the ipsilateral hindlimb and 11% of the contralateral hindlimb. 4. Although movements of the head were obtained from the whole extent of the brain stem, movements of the forelimbs showed a dorsoventral organization with flexion of the ipsilateral elbow being evoked from the more dorsal regions of the brain stem, whereas contralateral elbow extension was evoked more frequently from the ventral regions. There was a large area of overlap from which movements of both limbs could be obtained simultaneously. Movements of the hindlimbs were more frequently evoked from central and ventral areas of the brain stem and from the most rostral aspect of the explored region. 5. In examining the combinations of movements evoked by the MRF stimulation, it was found that the most commonly evoked pattern was movement of the head to the stimulated side together with flexion of the ipsilateral forelimb and extension of the contralateral forelimb (26.5% of sites).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2230923     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1990.64.3.767

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  40 in total

1.  Heterogeneity of the population of command neurons in the lamprey.

Authors:  P V Zelenin; S Grillner; G N Orlovsky; T G Deliagina
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Neuronal basis of crossed actions from the reticular formation on feline hindlimb motoneurons.

Authors:  Elzbieta Jankowska; Ingela Hammar; Urszula Slawinska; Katarzyna Maleszak; Stephen A Edgley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Networks of inhibitory and excitatory commissural interneurons mediating crossed reticulospinal actions.

Authors:  B Anne Bannatyne; Stephen A Edgley; Ingela Hammar; Elzbieta Jankowska; David J Maxwell
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Motor outputs from the primate reticular formation to shoulder muscles as revealed by stimulus-triggered averaging.

Authors:  Adam G Davidson; John A Buford
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-03-10       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Bilateral actions of the reticulospinal tract on arm and shoulder muscles in the monkey: stimulus triggered averaging.

Authors:  Adam G Davidson; John A Buford
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  How can corticospinal tract neurons contribute to ipsilateral movements? A question with implications for recovery of motor functions.

Authors:  Elzbieta Jankowska; Stephen A Edgley
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.519

Review 7.  Plasticity of connections underlying locomotor recovery after central and/or peripheral lesions in the adult mammals.

Authors:  Serge Rossignol
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Is there a brainstem substrate for action selection?

Authors:  M D Humphries; K Gurney; T J Prescott
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Impairment of postural control in rabbits with extensive spinal lesions.

Authors:  V F Lyalka; G N Orlovsky; T G Deliagina
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Effects of reversible spinalization on individual spinal neurons.

Authors:  Pavel V Zelenin; Vladimir F Lyalka; Li-Ju Hsu; Grigori N Orlovsky; Tatiana G Deliagina
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.