Literature DB >> 22309029

Is there a hierarchy of social inferences? The likelihood and speed of inferring intentionality, mind, and personality.

Bertram F Malle1, Jess Holbrook.   

Abstract

People interpret behavior by making inferences about agents' intentionality, mind, and personality. Past research studied such inferences 1 at a time; in real life, people make these inferences simultaneously. The present studies therefore examined whether 4 major inferences (intentionality, desire, belief, and personality), elicited simultaneously in response to an observed behavior, might be ordered in a hierarchy of likelihood and speed. To achieve generalizability, the studies included a wide range of stimulus behaviors, presented them verbally and as dynamic videos, and assessed inferences both in a retrieval paradigm (measuring the likelihood and speed of accessing inferences immediately after they were made) and in an online processing paradigm (measuring the speed of forming inferences during behavior observation). Five studies provide evidence for a hierarchy of social inferences-from intentionality and desire to belief to personality-that is stable across verbal and visual presentations and that parallels the order found in developmental and primate research. (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22309029     DOI: 10.1037/a0026790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  11 in total

1.  Dissociation of a trait and a valence representation in the mPFC.

Authors:  Ning Ma; Kris Baetens; Marie Vandekerckhove; Laurens Van der Cruyssen; Frank Van Overwalle
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Traits are represented in the medial prefrontal cortex: an fMRI adaptation study.

Authors:  Ning Ma; Kris Baetens; Marie Vandekerckhove; Jenny Kestemont; Wim Fias; Frank Van Overwalle
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Cognitive processes in imaginative moral shifts: How judgments of morally unacceptable actions change.

Authors:  Beyza Tepe; Ruth M J Byrne
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-05-09

Review 4.  The computational challenge of social learning.

Authors:  Oriel FeldmanHall; Matthew R Nassar
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2021-09-25       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  The Moral Dyad: A Fundamental Template Unifying Moral Judgment.

Authors:  Kurt Gray; Adam Waytz; Liane Young
Journal:  Psychol Inq       Date:  2012-05-31

6.  How people explain their own and others' behavior: a theory of lay causal explanations.

Authors:  Gisela Böhm; Hans-Rüdiger Pfister
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-18

7.  Perceptions of intentionality for goal-related action: behavioral description matters.

Authors:  Andrew E Monroe; Glenn D Reeder; Lauren James
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Controversy matters: Impacts of topic and solution controversy on the perceived credibility of a scientist who advocates.

Authors:  Lindsey Beall; Teresa A Myers; John E Kotcher; Emily K Vraga; Edward W Maibach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Explaining the Timing of Natural Scene Understanding with a Computational Model of Perceptual Categorization.

Authors:  Imri Sofer; Sébastien M Crouzet; Thomas Serre
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Beliefs about others' intentions determine whether cooperation is the faster choice.

Authors:  Juana Castro Santa; Filippos Exadaktylos; Salvador Soto-Faraco
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.