Literature DB >> 22308998

Aging and the memorial consequences of catching contradictions with prior knowledge.

Sharda Umanath1, Elizabeth J Marsh.   

Abstract

This experiment tested the possibility that older adults are less susceptible to semantic illusions because they are more likely to notice contradictions with stored knowledge. Older and young adults encoded stories containing factual inaccuracies; critically, half the participants were instructed to mark any errors they noticed. Older adults reproduced fewer story-errors on a later general knowledge test, but there were no age differences in marking errors during encoding. However, older adults were better able to recover and answer correctly after failing to notice errors during story-reading. Implications for false memories and semantic illusions are discussed. 2013 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22308998     DOI: 10.1037/a0027242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Aging        ISSN: 0882-7974


  6 in total

1.  Memory for flip-flopping: detection and recollection of political contradictions.

Authors:  Adam L Putnam; Christopher N Wahlheim; Larry L Jacoby
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-10

2.  Looking on the Bright Side: Aging and the Impact of Emotional Future Simulation on Subsequent Memory.

Authors:  Aleea L Devitt; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 4.077

3.  Autobiographical memory conjunction errors in younger and older adults: Evidence for a role of inhibitory ability.

Authors:  Aleea L Devitt; Lynette Tippett; Daniel L Schacter; Donna Rose Addis
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2016-12

4.  Evaluating suggestibility to additive and contradictory misinformation following explicit error detection in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Mark J Huff; Sharda Umanath
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2017-08-17

Review 5.  False memories with age: Neural and cognitive underpinnings.

Authors:  Aleea L Devitt; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Proofreading in Young and Older Adults: The Effect of Error Category and Comprehension Difficulty.

Authors:  Meredith A Shafto
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.