Literature DB >> 2230896

Node-negative breast cancer: prognostic subgroups defined by tumor size and flow cytometry.

S M O'Reilly1, R S Camplejohn, D M Barnes, R R Millis, R D Rubens, M A Richards.   

Abstract

Adjuvant systemic therapy for women with node-negative breast cancer is most easily justified for those patients at highest risk of relapse. We have examined the impact of tumor size, histologic grade, estrogen receptor (ER) status, tumor ploidy, and S-phase fraction (SPF) on relapse-free survival (RFS) for 169 patients with node-negative breast cancer in order to identify groups of patients at high and low risk of relapse. Patients with small tumors (less than or equal to 1.0 cm) had a significantly better RFS than those with larger tumors (P = .005), with 96% remaining relapse-free at 5 years. Patients with tumors less than or equal to 1.0 cm were thus excluded from analysis when attempting to define a group with a poor prognosis. Within the group of patients with tumors greater than 1.0 cm, tumor ploidy (P = .63), ER status (P = .3), or progesterone receptor (PgR) status (P = .24) did not predict for RFS. Patients with grade 1 or 2 infiltrating ductal tumors had a significantly better prognosis than those with grade 3 tumors (P = .04). The prognostic factor that gave the widest separation between subgroups, however, was SPF. Patients whose tumors were greater than 1.0 cm with an SPF less than or equal to 10% had a 5-year RFS of 78% compared with a 5-year RFS of 52% for those with an SPF greater than 10% (P = .006). We have combined tumor size and SPF to identify three prognostic groups: (1) tumor less than or equal to 1.0 cm, 5-year RFS 96%; (2) tumor greater than 1.0 cm plus SPF less than or equal to 10%, 5-year RFS 78%; 3) tumor greater than 1.0 cm plus SPF greater than 10%, 5-year RFS 52%. These prognostic groupings may help identify patients most suitable for adjuvant therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2230896     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1990.8.12.2040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  24 in total

1.  Prognostic factors and natural history in lymph node-negative breast cancer patients.

Authors:  R Arriagada; L E Rutqvist; L Skoog; H Johansson; A Kramar
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 2.  Management of early breast cancer.

Authors:  R D Rubens
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-05-23

3.  Comparison between different cell kinetic variables in human breast cancer.

Authors:  F Barzanti; M Dal Susino; A Volpi; D Amadori; A Riccobon; E Scarpi; L Medri; L Bernardi; S Naldi; M Aldi; M Gaudio; W Zoli
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.831

4.  Proliferating cell nuclear antigen in breast lesions: correlation of c-erbB-2 oncoprotein and EGF receptor and its clinicopathological significance in breast cancer.

Authors:  P Shrestha; K Yamada; T Wada; S Maeda; M Watatani; M Yasutomi; H Takagi; M Mori
Journal:  Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol       Date:  1992

5.  Comparison of PCNA/cyclin immunohistochemistry with flow cytometric S-phase fraction in breast cancer.

Authors:  D W Visscher; S Wykes; J Kubus; J D Crissman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 6.  Endocrine therapy for advanced breast cancer: a review.

Authors:  H B Muss
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Prognostic factors for bone metastases in breast cancer.

Authors:  M A Ulloa; E C Merchan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  DNA Cytometry Consensus Conference. Consensus review of the clinical utility of DNA cytometry in carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  D W Hedley; G M Clark; C J Cornelisse; D Killander; T Kute; D Merkel
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Prognostic significance of flow cytometric DNA analysis and estrogen receptor content in breast carcinomas--a 10 year survival study.

Authors:  S B Ewers; R Attewell; B Baldetorp; A Borg; M Fernö; E Långström; D Killander
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Tumor proliferative activity and response to first-line chemotherapy in advanced breast carcinoma.

Authors:  A Bonetti; M Zaninelli; S Rodella; A Molino; L Sperotto; Q Piubello; F Bonetti; R Nortilli; M Turazza; G L Cetto
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.