Literature DB >> 22308625

Promises and difficulties with the use of femoral intra-medullary lengthening nails to treat limb length discrepancies.

Madhavan Chikkapapanna Papanna1, Puneet Monga, Nawfal Al-Hadithy, Richard Allen Wilkes.   

Abstract

Limb lengthening using external fixation may be associated with problems such as pin-track infections, poor patient acceptance, muscle transfixation, secondary axial deformity and re-fractures. Intramedullary lengthening nails have been designed to address these issues. We present our results for femoral limb lengthening in adults managed by intramedullary lengthening nails. A retrospective review was undertaken for 8 femoral lengthening procedures performed in adults using intra-medullary lengthening nails over a three-year period. The average age of our patients was 34 years; the average duration of follow-up was 26.5 months (range: 8 to 40 months). An Albizzia nail was used in 5 procedures, an Intra-medullary Skeletal Kinetic Distractor (ISKD nail) in 3 procedures. Target lengthening was achieved in 6 out of 8 femurs with an average of 38.77 mm (range: 0 to 70 mm) length gained. The distraction index (length gained per day) was 0.58 on average (range: 0-1.25) and the consolidation index average was 5039 (range: 0-79) days/cm. Premature consolidation was noted in 4 cases, runaway acute lengthening in one patient; prominent metalwork--noted in 4 patients--and a bent nail were frequent obstacles and meant multiple visits to theatre. Femoral lengthening with an intramedullary lengthening nail is a reasonable alternative to external fixators, thereby avoiding problems associated with callotasis using external fixation methods. It is however, important to counsel patients regarding possibilities of significant obstacles including failure and multiple visits to theatre during the process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22308625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg        ISSN: 0001-6462            Impact factor:   0.500


  6 in total

1.  Precision of the PRECICE internal bone lengthening nail.

Authors:  Yatin M Kirane; Austin T Fragomen; S Robert Rozbruch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  The Ilizarov paradigm: thirty years with the Ilizarov method, current concerns and future research.

Authors:  Alexander V Gubin; Dmitry Y Borzunov; Tatiana A Malkova
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  How precise is the PRECICE compared to the ISKD in intramedullary limb lengthening? Reliability and safety in 26 procedures.

Authors:  Frank M Schiedel; Björn Vogt; Henning L Tretow; Britta Schuhknecht; Georg Gosheger; Melanie J Horter; Robert Rödl
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.717

4.  Limb Lengthening Using the PRECICETM Nail System: Complications and Results.

Authors:  Ulrich Wiebking; Emmanouil Liodakis; Mohamed Kenawey; Christian Krettek
Journal:  Arch Trauma Res       Date:  2016-08-23

5.  PRECICE® magnetically-driven, telescopic, intramedullary lengthening nail: pre-clinical testing and first 30 patients.

Authors:  Pablo Wagner; Rolf D Burghardt; Stuart A Green; Stacy C Specht; Shawn C Standard; John E Herzenberg
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2017-03-06

6.  Total hip arthroplasty and femoral nail lengthening for hip dysplasia and limb-length discrepancy.

Authors:  Elizabeth Harkin; S Robert Rozbruch; Tomas Liskutin; William Hopkinson; Mitchell Bernstein
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2018-05-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.