Literature DB >> 22307063

Introduction of a computer-based surgical platform in the surgical care of patients with newly diagnosed uterine cancer: outcomes and impact on approach.

Mario M Leitao1, Gabriel Briscoe, Kevin Santos, Abigail Winder, Elizabeth L Jewell, William J Hoskins, Dennis S Chi, Nadeem R Abu-Rustum, Yukio Sonoda, Carol L Brown, Douglas A Levine, Richard R Barakat, Ginger J Gardner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the introduction of computer-based surgery (ie, robotic surgery [RBT]) in the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed uterine cancer.
METHODS: We identified all patients who presented to our institution for initial surgical care of newly diagnosed uterine cancer from 5/1/07-12/31/10. Perioperative outcomes of laparotomy cases were compared to those of laparoscopic (LSC) or RBT cases. Complications within 30 days of surgery were graded.
RESULTS: Of 752 patients, the planned approach was laparotomy in 103 (14%), LSC in 302 (40%), and RBT in 347 (46%). The rate of laparotomy for any reason (planned or converted) was 39% in 2007 compared to 18% in 2010 (P<0.001). Preoperative characteristics for LSC and RBT cases were similar, except 10% versus 15%, respectively, were morbidly obese (P=0.049). The extent of procedure, total nodal counts, and overall complications were similar between the LSC and RBT cases. The median length of stay was shorter for RBT cases (P<0.001). The median total room and operative times were longer for RBT cases (P<0.001), mainly due to cases in which the surgeon had less than ~40 RBT cases of experience.
CONCLUSIONS: Robotics can be efficiently introduced into the surgical care of patients with newly diagnosed uterine cancers. RBT cases require the same operative times as LSC cases after accounting for the 40-case learning curve. Both approaches result in similar excellent patient outcomes and remain reasonable approaches for this disease. The introduction of robotics may lead to further reduction in the rate of laparotomy.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22307063     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.01.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  9 in total

Review 1.  Influence of steep Trendelenburg position on postoperative complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Satoshi Katayama; Keiichiro Mori; Benjamin Pradere; Takafumi Yanagisawa; Hadi Mostafaei; Fahad Quhal; Reza Sari Motlagh; Ekaterina Laukhtina; Nico C Grossmann; Pawel Rajwa; Abdulmajeed Aydh; Frederik König; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Motoo Araki; Yasutomo Nasu; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-12-31

2.  Impact of Robotic Platforms on Surgical Approach and Costs in the Management of Morbidly Obese Patients with Newly Diagnosed Uterine Cancer.

Authors:  Mario M Leitao; Wazim R Narain; Donna Boccamazzo; Vasileios Sioulas; Danielle Cassella; Jennifer A Ducie; Ane Gerda Z Eriksson; Yukio Sonoda; Dennis S Chi; Carol L Brown; Douglas A Levine; Elizabeth L Jewell; Oliver Zivanovic; Richard R Barakat; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Ginger J Gardner
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 3.  Robot-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial and cervical cancers: a systematic review.

Authors:  Immaculate F Nevis; Bahareh Vali; Caroline Higgins; Irfan Dhalla; David Urbach; Marcus Q Bernardini
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-07-16

Review 4.  Robotic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Carrie Y Peterson; Martin R Weiser
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  The Role of Robotic Visceral Surgery in Patients with Adhesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Marco Milone; Michele Manigrasso; Pietro Anoldo; Anna D'Amore; Ugo Elmore; Mariano Cesare Giglio; Gianluca Rompianesi; Sara Vertaldi; Roberto Ivan Troisi; Nader K Francis; Giovanni Domenico De Palma
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-02-18

6.  Learning curve analysis of robot-assisted radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: initial experience at a single institution.

Authors:  Ga Won Yim; Sang Wun Kim; Eun Ji Nam; Sunghoon Kim; Young Tae Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 7.  Surgical treatment for apparent early stage endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Yukio Sonoda
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2014-01-16

Review 8.  A comparison of operative outcomes between standard and robotic laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thomas Ind; Alex Laios; Matthew Hacking; Marielle Nobbenhuis
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.547

9.  Introduction of robotic surgery for endometrial cancer into a Brazilian cancer service: a randomized trial evaluating perioperative clinical outcomes and costs.

Authors:  Alexandre Silva E Silva; João Paulo Mancusi de Carvalho; Cristina Anton; Rodrigo Pinto Fernandes; Edmund Chada Baracat; Jesus Paula Carvalho
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 2.365

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.