Literature DB >> 22307035

An experimental test of the concentration index.

Han Bleichrodt1, Kirsten I M Rohde, Tom Van Ourti.   

Abstract

The concentration index is widely used to measure income-related inequality in health. No insight exists, however, whether the concentration index connects with people's preferences about distributions of income and health and whether a reduction in the concentration index reflects an increase in social welfare. We explored this question by testing the central assumption underlying the concentration index and found that it was systematically violated. We also tested the validity of alternative health inequality measures that have been proposed in the literature. Our data showed that decreases in the spread of income and health were considered socially desirable, but decreases in the correlation between income and health not necessarily. Support for a condition implying that the inequality in the distribution of income and in the distribution of health can be considered separately was mixed.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22307035      PMCID: PMC4753067          DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Econ        ISSN: 0167-6296            Impact factor:   3.883


  7 in total

1.  Income-related inequalities in health: some international comparisons.

Authors:  E van Doorslaer; A Wagstaff; H Bleichrodt; S Calonge; U G Gerdtham; M Gerfin; J Geurts; L Gross; U Häkkinen; R E Leu; O O'Donnell; C Propper; F Puffer; M Rodríguez; G Sundberg; O Winkelhake
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  A nonparametric elicitation of the equity-efficiency trade-off in cost-utility analysis.

Authors:  Han Bleichrodt; Jason Doctor; Elly Stolk
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2004-12-25       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  A welfare economics foundation for health inequality measurement.

Authors:  Han Bleichrodt; Eddy van Doorslaer
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2006-02-08       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Socio-economic differences in health, nutrition, and population within developing countries: an overview.

Authors:  D R Gwatkin; S Rutstein; K Johnson; E Suliman; A Wagstaff; A Amouzou
Journal:  Niger J Clin Pract       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 0.968

5.  Correcting the concentration index.

Authors:  Guido Erreygers
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2008-02-16       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 6.  On the measurement of inequalities in health.

Authors:  A Wagstaff; P Paci; E van Doorslaer
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Alternative approaches to valuing intangible health losses: the evidence for multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  F A Sloan; W K Viscusi; H W Chesson; C J Conover; K Whetten-Goldstein
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.883

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  EXAMINING SOCIOECONOMIC HEALTH DISPARITIES USING A RANK-DEPENDENT RÉNYI INDEX.

Authors:  Makram Talih
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.083

2.  Allocating health care resources: a questionnaire experiment on the predictive success of rules.

Authors:  Marlies Ahlert; Lars Schwettmann
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2017-06-26

3.  The Impact of Foreign Trade on Health Inequality in China: Evidence From China Family Panel Studies (CFPS).

Authors:  Pei Xu; Penghao Ye
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 5.100

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.