BACKGROUND AND AIM: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is superior to conventional BP measurement in predicting outcome, with baseline 24-h, daytime and night-time absolute values, as well as relative nocturnal decline, as powerful determinants of prognosis. We aimed to evaluate ABPM estimates on the appearance of cardiovascular events and mortality in a cohort of high-risk treated hypertensive patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 2115 treated hypertensive patients with high or very high added risk were evaluated by means of office and 24-h ABPM. Cardiovascular events and mortality were assessed after a median follow-up of 4 years. Two hundred and sixty-eight patients (12.7%) experienced a primary event (nonfatal coronary or cerebrovascular event, heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular death) and 114 died (45 from cardiovascular causes). In a multiple Cox regression model, and after adjusting for baseline cardiovascular risk and office BP, night-time SBP predicted cardiovascular events [hazard ratio for each SD increase: 1.45; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.29-1.59]. Values above 130 mmHg increased the risk by 52% in comparison to values less than 115 mmHg. CONCLUSION: In addition to clinical determinants of cardiovascular risk and conventional BP, ABPM performed during treatment adds prognostic significance on the development of cardiovascular events in high-risk hypertensive patients. Among different ABPM-derived values, night-time SBP is the most potent predictor of outcome.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is superior to conventional BP measurement in predicting outcome, with baseline 24-h, daytime and night-time absolute values, as well as relative nocturnal decline, as powerful determinants of prognosis. We aimed to evaluate ABPM estimates on the appearance of cardiovascular events and mortality in a cohort of high-risk treated hypertensivepatients. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 2115 treated hypertensivepatients with high or very high added risk were evaluated by means of office and 24-h ABPM. Cardiovascular events and mortality were assessed after a median follow-up of 4 years. Two hundred and sixty-eight patients (12.7%) experienced a primary event (nonfatal coronary or cerebrovascular event, heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular death) and 114 died (45 from cardiovascular causes). In a multiple Cox regression model, and after adjusting for baseline cardiovascular risk and office BP, night-time SBP predicted cardiovascular events [hazard ratio for each SD increase: 1.45; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.29-1.59]. Values above 130 mmHg increased the risk by 52% in comparison to values less than 115 mmHg. CONCLUSION: In addition to clinical determinants of cardiovascular risk and conventional BP, ABPM performed during treatment adds prognostic significance on the development of cardiovascular events in high-risk hypertensivepatients. Among different ABPM-derived values, night-time SBP is the most potent predictor of outcome.
Authors: K Solocinski; M Holzworth; X Wen; K-Y Cheng; I J Lynch; B D Cain; C S Wingo; M L Gumz Journal: Acta Physiol (Oxf) Date: 2016-10-03 Impact factor: 6.311
Authors: Piotr Dobrowolski; Aleksander Prejbisz; Anna Klisiewicz; Elżbieta Florczak; Justyna Rybicka; Andrzej Januszewicz; Piotr Hoffman Journal: Hypertens Res Date: 2015-03-19 Impact factor: 3.872
Authors: Paul E Drawz; Roland Brown; Luca De Nicola; Naohiko Fujii; Francis B Gabbai; Jennifer Gassman; Jiang He; Satoshi Iimuro; James Lash; Roberto Minutolo; Robert A Phillips; Kyle Rudser; Luis Ruilope; Susan Steigerwalt; Raymond R Townsend; Dawei Xie; Mahboob Rahman Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2018-07-05 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Juan A Divisón-Garrote; Juan J de la Cruz; Alejandro de la Sierra; Ernest Vinyoles; Manuel Gorostidi; Carlos Escobar-Cervantes; Julián Segura; Vivencio Barrios; Luis M Ruilope; José R Banegas Journal: Hypertens Res Date: 2020-05-12 Impact factor: 3.872
Authors: Davide L Vetrano; Maria S Pisciotta; Vincenzo Brandi; Maria R Lo Monaco; Alice Laudisio; Graziano Onder; Domenico Fusco; Paolo D L'Angiocola; Anna R Bentivoglio; Roberto Bernabei; Giuseppe Zuccalà Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2016-11-02 Impact factor: 3.738