Literature DB >> 22306258

Estimating the impact of off-balancing forces upon cardiopulmonary resuscitation during ambulance transport.

Michael Christopher Kurz1, Siddhartha A Dante, Brian J Puckett.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOH-CA) remains poor, especially when patients are transported with CPR in progress. Previous investigations suggest that CPR quality erodes during transport due to the austere environment. We sought to determine how frequently ambulance personnel are exposed to off-balancing forces during transport of OOH-CA patients and to estimate the potential impact on CPR and coronary perfusion pressure (CPP).
METHODS: An onboard monitoring system was utilized to record acceleration data during the transport of 50 OOH-CA patients. Acceleration vectors were calculated for every second of drive time (speed >0 m/s). A model was constructed to estimate the potential impact of these vectors upon CPR and CPP. These data were then compared to a case-control cohort of 102 matched non-urgent transports.
RESULTS: A total of 5.8h of drive time was analyzed in the cardiac arrest cohort. Mean transport time was 8 min 53 s with a mean drive time of 6 min 58 s. Critical acceleration threshold was exceeded 60% of transport time (202.42 min, mean 4.05 min/transport) yielding a potential hands-off ratio of 0.42 with a CPP<15 mmHg 62% of drive time. Ambulance speed was inversely related to the magnitude of off-balancing forces. Comparison to 14.1h of control cohort yielded similar off-balancing forces and relationships despite lower speeds and no "lights and siren" use.
CONCLUSION: Critical acceleration forces occur frequently during transport of OOH-CA patients and may directly effect CPR quality and thereby CPP. These force vectors are stronger and more frequent at slower speeds, comprising the majority of ambulance drive time. Reducing speed or transporting OOH-CA patients without lights and sirens does little to mitigate these forces.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22306258     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.01.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  8 in total

1.  Frequency and influencing factors of cardiopulmonary resuscitation-related injuries during implementation of the American Heart Association 2010 Guidelines: a retrospective study based on autopsy and postmortem computed tomography.

Authors:  Rutsuko Yamaguchi; Yohsuke Makino; Fumiko Chiba; Suguru Torimitsu; Daisuke Yajima; Go Inokuchi; Ayumi Motomura; Mari Hashimoto; Yumi Hoshioka; Tomohiro Shinozaki; Hirotaro Iwase
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  A stabilization device that promotes the efficiency of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during ambulance transportation to the level as under non-moving conditions.

Authors:  Ning-Ping Foo; Jer-Hao Chang; Shih-Bin Su; Kow-Tong Chen; Ching-Fa Cheng; Pei-Chung Chen; Tsung-Yi Lin; How-Ran Guo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Mechanical CPR: Who? When? How?

Authors:  Kurtis Poole; Keith Couper; Michael A Smyth; Joyce Yeung; Gavin D Perkins
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 9.097

4.  Evaluation of the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation according to vehicle driving pattern, using a virtual reality ambulance driving system: a prospective, cross-over, randomised study.

Authors:  Jin Ho Beom; Min Joung Kim; Je Sung You; Hye Sun Lee; Ji Hoon Kim; Yoo Seok Park; Dong Min Shin; Hyun Soo Chung
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  The Effect of Transport Time Interval on Neurological Recovery after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Patients without a Prehospital Return of Spontaneous Circulation.

Authors:  Jeong Ho Park; Yu Jin Kim; Young Sun Ro; Sola Kim; Won Chul Cha; Sang Do Shin
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Which one is more effective during ambulance transport?

Authors:  İshak Şan; Burak Bekgöz; Mehmet Ergin; Eren Usul
Journal:  Turk J Emerg Med       Date:  2021-02-12

Review 7.  Comparison between Prehospital Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Devices and Manual CPR for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis.

Authors:  Cheng-Ying Chiang; Ket-Cheong Lim; Pei Chun Lai; Tou-Yuan Tsai; Yen Ta Huang; Ming-Jen Tsai
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  The Efficacy of LUCAS in Prehospital Cardiac Arrest Scenarios: A Crossover Mannequin Study.

Authors:  Robert A Gyory; Scott E Buchle; David Rodgers; Jeffrey S Lubin
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2017-03-14
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.