Literature DB >> 22306007

E-mail invitations to general practitioners were as effective as postal invitations and were more efficient.

Shaun Treweek1, Karen Barnett, Graeme Maclennan, Debbie Bonetti, Martin P Eccles, Jill J Francis, Claire Jones, Nigel B Pitts, Ian W Ricketts, Mark Weal, Frank Sullivan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate which of two invitation methods, e-mail or post, was most effective at recruiting general practitioners (GPs) to an online trial. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: Randomized controlled trial. Participants were GPs in Scotland, United Kingdom.
RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy GPs were recruited. Using e-mail did not improve recruitment (risk difference=0.7% [95% confidence interval -2.7% to 4.1%]). E-mail was, however, simpler to use and cheaper, costing £3.20 per recruit compared with £15.69 for postal invitations. Reminders increased recruitment by around 4% for each reminder sent for both invitation methods.
CONCLUSIONS: In the Scottish context, inviting GPs to take part in an online trial by e-mail does not adversely affect recruitment and is logistically easier and cheaper than using postal invitations.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22306007     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  7 in total

Review 1.  Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised trials.

Authors:  Shaun Treweek; Marie Pitkethly; Jonathan Cook; Cynthia Fraser; Elizabeth Mitchell; Frank Sullivan; Catherine Jackson; Tyna K Taskila; Heidi Gardner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-02-22

Review 2.  Digital tools for the recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a systematic map.

Authors:  Geoff K Frampton; Jonathan Shepherd; Karen Pickett; Gareth Griffiths; Jeremy C Wyatt
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Development of a co-designed behaviour change intervention aimed at healthcare professionals recruiting to clinical trials in maternity care.

Authors:  Linda Biesty; Katie Gillies; Vivienne Hanrahan; Louisa Lawrie; Eilidh Duncan
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 2.728

4.  Methods to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shaun Treweek; Pauline Lockhart; Marie Pitkethly; Jonathan A Cook; Monica Kjeldstrøm; Marit Johansen; Taina K Taskila; Frank M Sullivan; Sue Wilson; Catherine Jackson; Ritu Jones; Elizabeth D Mitchell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Guidelines for reporting embedded recruitment trials.

Authors:  Vichithranie W Madurasinghe
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Trial Forge Guidance 1: what is a Study Within A Trial (SWAT)?

Authors:  Shaun Treweek; Simon Bevan; Peter Bower; Marion Campbell; Jacquie Christie; Mike Clarke; Clive Collett; Seonaidh Cotton; Declan Devane; Adel El Feky; Ella Flemyng; Sandra Galvin; Heidi Gardner; Katie Gillies; Jan Jansen; Roberta Littleford; Adwoa Parker; Craig Ramsay; Lynne Restrup; Frank Sullivan; David Torgerson; Liz Tremain; Matthew Westmore; Paula R Williamson
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Making clinical trials more relevant: improving and validating the PRECIS tool for matching trial design decisions to trial purpose.

Authors:  Kirsty Loudon; Merrick Zwarenstein; Frank Sullivan; Peter Donnan; Shaun Treweek
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 2.279

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.