Literature DB >> 22305991

Reactivation of visual cortex during memory retrieval: content specificity and emotional modulation.

Christoph Hofstetter1, Amal Achaibou, Patrik Vuilleumier.   

Abstract

Studies on memory retrieval suggest a reactivation of cortical regions engaged during encoding, such that visual or auditory areas reactivate for visual or auditory memories. The content specificity and any emotion dependency of such reactivations are still unclear. Because distinct visual areas are specialized in processing distinct stimulus categories, we tested for face and word specific reactivations during a memory task using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Furthermore, because visual processing and memory are both modulated by emotion, we compared reactivation for stimuli encoded in a neutral or emotionally significant context. In the learning phase, participants studied pairs of stimuli that consisted of either a scene and a face, or a scene and a word. Scenes were either neutral or negative, but did not contain faces or words. In the test phase scenes were presented alone (one in turn), and participants indicated whether it was previously paired with a face, a word, or was new. Results from the test phase showed activation in a functionally defined face-responsive region in the right fusiform gyrus, as well as in a word-responsive region in the left inferior temporal gyrus, for scenes previously paired with faces and words, respectively. Reactivation tended to be larger in both the face- and word-responsive regions when the associated scene was negative as compared to neutral. However, relative to neutral context, the recall of faces and words paired with a negative context produced smaller activations in brain regions associated with social and semantic processing, respectively, as well as poorer memory performance overall. Taken together, these results support the idea of cortical memory reactivations, even at a content-specific level, and further suggest that emotional context may produce opposite effects on reactivations in early sensory areas and more elaborate processing in higher-level cortical areas. Copyright Â
© 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22305991     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  17 in total

1.  Neural similarity between encoding and retrieval is related to memory via hippocampal interactions.

Authors:  Maureen Ritchey; Erik A Wing; Kevin S LaBar; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Recapitulation of emotional source context during memory retrieval.

Authors:  Holly J Bowen; Elizabeth A Kensinger
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Cortical reinstatement and the confidence and accuracy of source memory.

Authors:  Preston P Thakral; Tracy H Wang; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Hippocampal structure predicts cortical indices of reactivation of related items.

Authors:  John A Walker; Kathy A Low; Mark A Fletcher; Neal J Cohen; Gabriele Gratton; Monica Fabiani
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Confidence of emotion expression recognition recruits brain regions outside the face perception network.

Authors:  Indrit Bègue; Maarten Vaessen; Jeremy Hofmeister; Marice Pereira; Sophie Schwartz; Patrik Vuilleumier
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Parahippocampal cortex activation during context reinstatement predicts item recollection.

Authors:  Rachel A Diana; Andrew P Yonelinas; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2013-08-12

7.  Effect of emotional valence on retrieval-related recapitulation of encoding activity in the ventral visual stream.

Authors:  Sarah M Kark; Elizabeth A Kensinger
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Adaptation to emotional conflict: evidence from a novel face emotion paradigm.

Authors:  Peter E Clayson; Michael J Larson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Retrieval, monitoring, and control processes: a 7 tesla FMRI approach to memory accuracy.

Authors:  Uda-Mareke Risius; Angelica Staniloiu; Martina Piefke; Stefan Maderwald; Frank P Schulte; Matthias Brand; Hans J Markowitsch
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  When memory leads the brain to take scenes at face value: face areas are reactivated at test by scenes that were paired with faces at study.

Authors:  John A Walker; Kathy A Low; Neal J Cohen; Monica Fabiani; Gabriele Gratton
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.