BACKGROUND: After distal bypass for limb salvage, persistence of large ischemic ulcers with exposure of tendons, joints, and bone and secondary graft exposure can lead to amputation, even though the bypass remains patent. Coverage of such defects using free flaps is too lengthy and complex for use in elderly patients. Although quick and simple, pedicled flaps are often considered to be contraindicated in patients with occlusive artery disease. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of pedicled flaps harvested after evaluation of revascularized territories on angiograms for coverage of tissue defects. METHODS: From 1994 to 2000, a total of 23 pedicled flap procedures were performed in 22 patients with a mean age of 75 years (range, 54-91 years). The distal anastomosis of the bypass was located on a tibial or pedal artery in 19 cases and on the popliteal artery in 4. The indication for flap placement was chronic ulcer in 7 cases, secondary graft exposure in 15, and open fracture with acute ischemia in 1. To be considered as usable, the flap had to be vascularized by a pedicle fed by the bypassed artery and have a rotational axis sufficient to cover the defect. Muscle flaps were used in 11 cases, fasciocutaneous flaps in 10, and fascial flaps in 2. RESULTS: The flap procedures in this study led to primary healing in 17 cases, secondary healing in 4 cases, and failure due to necrosis in 2. Follow-up examination was carried out with Doppler ultrasonography at 1, 6, and 12 months and every 6 months thereafter. The mean follow-up period was 23 months (range, 3-5 years). Statistical analysis demonstrated bypass patency, limb salvage, and survival rates in agreement with those previously reported in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that pedicle flaps are feasible after distal bypass in patients with lower-extremity occlusive artery disease. This technique expands the indication for limb salvage with low morbidity.
BACKGROUND: After distal bypass for limb salvage, persistence of large ischemic ulcers with exposure of tendons, joints, and bone and secondary graft exposure can lead to amputation, even though the bypass remains patent. Coverage of such defects using free flaps is too lengthy and complex for use in elderly patients. Although quick and simple, pedicled flaps are often considered to be contraindicated in patients with occlusive artery disease. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of pedicled flaps harvested after evaluation of revascularized territories on angiograms for coverage of tissue defects. METHODS: From 1994 to 2000, a total of 23 pedicled flap procedures were performed in 22 patients with a mean age of 75 years (range, 54-91 years). The distal anastomosis of the bypass was located on a tibial or pedal artery in 19 cases and on the popliteal artery in 4. The indication for flap placement was chronic ulcer in 7 cases, secondary graft exposure in 15, and open fracture with acute ischemia in 1. To be considered as usable, the flap had to be vascularized by a pedicle fed by the bypassed artery and have a rotational axis sufficient to cover the defect. Muscle flaps were used in 11 cases, fasciocutaneous flaps in 10, and fascial flaps in 2. RESULTS: The flap procedures in this study led to primary healing in 17 cases, secondary healing in 4 cases, and failure due to necrosis in 2. Follow-up examination was carried out with Doppler ultrasonography at 1, 6, and 12 months and every 6 months thereafter. The mean follow-up period was 23 months (range, 3-5 years). Statistical analysis demonstrated bypass patency, limb salvage, and survival rates in agreement with those previously reported in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that pedicle flaps are feasible after distal bypass in patients with lower-extremity occlusive artery disease. This technique expands the indication for limb salvage with low morbidity.