Literature DB >> 22304842

Ankle and midfoot kinetics during normal gait: a multi-segment approach.

Philippe C Dixon1, Harald Böhm, Leonhard Döderlein.   

Abstract

Multi-segment foot models are increasingly being used to evaluate intra and inter-segment foot kinematics such as the motion between the hindfoot/tibia (ankle) and the forefoot/hindfoot (midfoot) during walking. However, kinetic analysis have been mainly restricted to one-segment foot models and could be improved by considering a multi-segment approach. Therefore, the aims of this study were to (1) implement a kinetic analysis of the ankle and theoretical midfoot joints using the existing Oxford Foot Model (OFM) through a standard inverse dynamics approach using only marker, force plate and anthropometric data and (2) to compare OFM ankle joint kinetics to those output by the one-segment foot plugin-gait model (PIG). 10 healthy adolescents fitted with both the OFM and PIG markers performed barefoot comfortable speed walking trials over an instrumented walkway. The maximum ankle power generation was significantly reduced by approximately 40% through OFM calculations compared to PIG estimates (p<0.001). This result was not caused by a decrease in OFM computed joint moments, but by a reduction in the angular velocity between the tibia/hindfoot (OFM) compared to the tibia/foot (PIG) (p<0.001). Additionally, analysis revealed considerable midfoot loading. One-segment foot models overestimate ankle power, and may also overestimate the contribution of the triceps surae. A multi-segment approach may help quantify the important contribution of the midfoot ligaments and musculature to power generation. We therefore recommend the use of multi-segment foot models to estimate ankle and midfoot kinetics, especially when surgical decision-making is based on the results of three-dimensional gait analysis. Copyright Â
© 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22304842     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  12 in total

Review 1.  Ankle and foot power in gait analysis: Implications for science, technology and clinical assessment.

Authors:  Karl E Zelik; Eric C Honert
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Partitioning ground reaction forces for multi-segment foot joint kinetics.

Authors:  Dustin A Bruening; Kota Z Takahashi
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  The effect of walking speed on the foot inter-segment kinematics, ground reaction forces and lower limb joint moments.

Authors:  Dong Sun; Gusztáv Fekete; Qichang Mei; Yaodong Gu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Direct assessment of 3D foot bone kinematics using biplanar X-ray fluoroscopy and an automatic model registration method.

Authors:  Kohta Ito; Koh Hosoda; Masahiro Shimizu; Shuhei Ikemoto; Shinnosuke Kume; Takeo Nagura; Nobuaki Imanishi; Sadakazu Aiso; Masahiro Jinzaki; Naomichi Ogihara
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  Pathophysiology of juvenile idiopathic arthritis induced pes planovalgus in static and walking condition: a functional view using 3D gait analysis.

Authors:  Josephine Merker; Matthias Hartmann; Florian Kreuzpointner; Ansgar Schwirtz; Johannes-Peter Haas
Journal:  Pediatr Rheumatol Online J       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 3.054

6.  The prevention of diabetic foot ulceration: how biomechanical research informs clinical practice.

Authors:  Frank E DiLiberto; Judith F Baumhauer; Deborah A Nawoczenski
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Running and Physical Activity in an Air-Polluted Environment: The Biomechanical and Musculoskeletal Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study 4HAIE (Healthy Aging in Industrial Environment-Program 4).

Authors:  Daniel Jandacka; Jaroslav Uchytil; David Zahradnik; Roman Farana; Dominik Vilimek; Jiri Skypala; Jan Urbaczka; Jan Plesek; Adam Motyka; Denisa Blaschova; Gabriela Beinhauerova; Marketa Rygelova; Pavel Brtva; Klara Balazova; Veronika Horka; Jan Malus; Julia Freedman Silvernail; Gareth Irwin; Miika T Nieminen; Victor Casula; Vladimir Juras; Milos Golian; Steriani Elavsky; Lenka Knapova; Radim Sram; Joseph Hamill
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Strength training for the intrinsic flexor muscles of the foot: effects on muscle strength, the foot arch, and dynamic parameters before and after the training.

Authors:  Takayuki Hashimoto; Keishoku Sakuraba
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2014-03-25

9.  Assessment of Effective Ankle Joint Positioning in Strength Training for Intrinsic Foot Flexor Muscles: A Comparison of Intrinsic Foot Flexor Muscle Activity in a Position Intermediate to Plantar and Dorsiflexion with that in Maximum Plantar Flexion Using Needle Electromyography.

Authors:  Takayuki Hashimoto; Keishoku Sakuraba
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2014-03-25

10.  Coordination among the rearfoot, midfoot, and forefoot during walking.

Authors:  Tomoya Takabayashi; Mutsuaki Edama; Emi Nakamura; Erika Yokoyama; Chiaki Kanaya; Masayoshi Kubo
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 2.303

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.