Literature DB >> 22304506

Seeking better health care outcomes: the ethics of using the "nudge".

J S Blumenthal-Barby1, Hadley Burroughs.   

Abstract

Policymakers, employers, insurance companies, researchers, and health care providers have developed an increasing interest in using principles from behavioral economics and psychology to persuade people to change their health-related behaviors, lifestyles, and habits. In this article, we examine how principles from behavioral economics and psychology are being used to nudge people (the public, patients, or health care providers) toward particular decisions or behaviors related to health or health care, and we identify the ethically relevant dimensions that should be considered for the utilization of each principle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22304506     DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2011.634481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bioeth        ISSN: 1526-5161            Impact factor:   11.229


  36 in total

1.  Tolerant Paternalism: Pro-ethical Design as a Resolution of the Dilemma of Toleration.

Authors:  Luciano Floridi
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  A Randomized Trial of Expanding Choice Sets to Motivate Advance Directive Completion.

Authors:  Katherine R Courtright; Vanessa Madden; Nicole B Gabler; Elizabeth Cooney; Jennifer Kim; Nicole Herbst; Lauren Burgoon; Jennifer Whealdon; Laura M Dember; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  The Ethics of Vaccination Nudges in Pediatric Practice.

Authors:  Mark C Navin
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2017-03

4.  Aligning critical care interventions with patient goals: A modified Delphi study.

Authors:  Alison E Turnbull; Sarina K Sahetya; Dale M Needham
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.210

Review 5.  Engaging healthcare providers to implement HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis.

Authors:  Douglas Krakower; Kenneth H Mayer
Journal:  Curr Opin HIV AIDS       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.283

6.  Default options in advance directives influence how patients set goals for end-of-life care.

Authors:  Scott D Halpern; George Loewenstein; Kevin G Volpp; Elizabeth Cooney; Kelly Vranas; Caroline M Quill; Mary S McKenzie; Michael O Harhay; Nicole B Gabler; Tatiana Silva; Robert Arnold; Derek C Angus; Cindy Bryce
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Scientific second-order 'nudging' or lobbying by interest groups: the battle over abdominal aortic aneurysm screening programmes.

Authors:  Thomas Ploug; Søren Holm; John Brodersen
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2014-11

8.  The Continuing Evolution of Ethical Standards for Genomic Sequencing in Clinical Care: Restoring Patient Choice.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 1.718

9.  A behavioral economics-based telehealth intervention to improve aspirin adherence following hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Barbara Riegel; Alisa Stephens-Shields; Anne Jaskowiak-Barr; Marguerite Daus; Stephen E Kimmel
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 2.890

10.  Communication challenges for nongeneticist physicians relaying clinical genomic results.

Authors:  Nonie S Arora; J Kelly Davis; Christine Kirby; Amy L McGuire; Robert C Green; J S Blumenthal-Barby; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.512

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.