BACKGROUND: Recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA) is used to determine the specificity of antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV). The RIBA result is recorded as positive, negative, or indeterminate. The interpretation and significance of RIBA-indeterminate reactions are unclear. We addressed the clinical relevance of these reactions in the context of the natural history of HCV infection in a prospectively followed cohort of anti-HCV-positive blood donors. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Donor demographics, exposure history, and humoral and cell-mediated immunity (CMI) were compared in 15 RIBA-indeterminate subjects, nine chronic HCV carriers, and eight spontaneously recovered subjects. Serum samples were tested for anti-HCV by a quantitative, liquid luciferase immunoprecipitation system (LIPS). CMI was assessed by interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay. RESULTS: In the LIPS assay, the sum of antibody responses to six HCV antigens showed significant (p < 0.001) stepwise diminution progressing from chronic carriers to spontaneously recovered to RIBA-indeterminate subjects. CMI responses in RIBA-indeterminate subjects were similar to spontaneously recovered subjects and greater than chronic carriers and controls (p < 0.008). A parenteral risk factor was identified in only 13% of RIBA-indeterminate subjects compared to 89% of chronic carriers and 87% of spontaneously recovered subjects. RIBA-indeterminate donors were older than the other groups. CONCLUSION: The CMI and LIPS results suggest that persistent RIBA-indeterminate reactions represent waning anti-HCV responses in persons who have recovered from a remote HCV infection. In such cases, detectable antibody may ultimately disappear leaving no residual serologic evidence of prior HCV infection, as reported in a minority of long-term HCV-recovered subjects.
BACKGROUND: Recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA) is used to determine the specificity of antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV). The RIBA result is recorded as positive, negative, or indeterminate. The interpretation and significance of RIBA-indeterminate reactions are unclear. We addressed the clinical relevance of these reactions in the context of the natural history of HCV infection in a prospectively followed cohort of anti-HCV-positive blood donors. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Donor demographics, exposure history, and humoral and cell-mediated immunity (CMI) were compared in 15 RIBA-indeterminate subjects, nine chronic HCV carriers, and eight spontaneously recovered subjects. Serum samples were tested for anti-HCV by a quantitative, liquid luciferase immunoprecipitation system (LIPS). CMI was assessed by interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay. RESULTS: In the LIPS assay, the sum of antibody responses to six HCV antigens showed significant (p < 0.001) stepwise diminution progressing from chronic carriers to spontaneously recovered to RIBA-indeterminate subjects. CMI responses in RIBA-indeterminate subjects were similar to spontaneously recovered subjects and greater than chronic carriers and controls (p < 0.008). A parenteral risk factor was identified in only 13% of RIBA-indeterminate subjects compared to 89% of chronic carriers and 87% of spontaneously recovered subjects. RIBA-indeterminate donors were older than the other groups. CONCLUSION: The CMI and LIPS results suggest that persistent RIBA-indeterminate reactions represent waning anti-HCV responses in persons who have recovered from a remote HCV infection. In such cases, detectable antibody may ultimately disappear leaving no residual serologic evidence of prior HCV infection, as reported in a minority of long-term HCV-recovered subjects.
Authors: H M Diepolder; R Zachoval; R M Hoffmann; E A Wierenga; T Santantonio; M C Jung; D Eichenlaub; G R Pape Journal: Lancet Date: 1995-10-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: G Dusheiko; H Schmilovitz-Weiss; D Brown; F McOmish; P L Yap; S Sherlock; N McIntyre; P Simmonds Journal: Hepatology Date: 1994-01 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: J G Donahue; A Muñoz; P M Ness; D E Brown; D H Yawn; H A McAllister; B A Reitz; K E Nelson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1992-08-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J M Pawlotsky; A Fleury; V Choukroun; L Deforges; F Roudot-Thoraval; P Aumont; J Duval; D Dhumeaux Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1994-05 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Heiner Wedemeyer; Xiao-Song He; Michelina Nascimbeni; Anthony R Davis; Harry B Greenberg; Jay H Hoofnagle; T Jake Liang; Harvey Alter; Barbara Rehermann Journal: J Immunol Date: 2002-09-15 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: H Kileng; L Bernfort; T Gutteberg; O S Moen; M G Kristiansen; E J Paulssen; L K Berg; J Florholmen; R Goll Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2017-09-16 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Peter D Burbelo; Joseph A Kovacs; Jason Wagner; Ahmad Bayat; Craig S Rhodes; Yvonne De Souza; John S Greenspan; Michael J Iadarola Journal: AIDS Res Treat Date: 2012-08-08