Literature DB >> 2230347

MCA in patients with breast cancer: correlation with CEA and CA15-3.

R Molina1, X Filella, P Mengual, M Prats, G Zanon, M Daniels, A M Ballesta.   

Abstract

MCA serum levels were determined in 27 healthy subjects, 136 with benign pathology (42 breast) and in 289 patients with cancer (247 active). The last group includes 223 patients with breast cancer (96 without metastases, 89 with metastases and 38 no-evidence of disease). CEA and CA15-3 serum levels were determined in all the patients with breast diseases. The mean levels of MCA were 4.7 + 2.4 U/ml in the control group, considering less than 11 U/ml as normal. MCA values were abnormal in 15.4% of patients with benign pathology, mainly in those with liver cirrhosis (8/20) and lung diseases (4/20). In the majority of these cases, the rise was only moderate, lower than 15 U/ml in 97.5% of patients. In malignant diseases, important increments were found in breast cancer (19.8% Mo, 77.5% M1) and ovarian cancer stages III-IV (44.4%). When we compared MCA serum levels with CA15-3 and CEA in breast pathology, a similar specificity was observed: 92.3%, 92.3% and 100% in cases with benign pathology and 92.1%, 94.7%, and 97.4% in NED patients, respectively. MCA and CA15-3 sensitivity was similar in breast cancer without metastases (19.8%) and lower for CEA (16.7%). In patients with breast cancer without metastases, we found a relation between positivity of these tumor markers and prognostic factors (tumor size, nodal involvement). The disease free interval in patients with locoregional breast cancer was shorter in cases with abnormal presurgical levels of some of the tumor markers, but only the difference from MCA was significant (p less than 0.02).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2230347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biol Markers        ISSN: 0393-6155            Impact factor:   2.659


  6 in total

1.  Prognostic value of CA 19.9 levels in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  X Filella; R Molina; J J Grau; J M Piqué; J C Garcia-Valdecasas; E Astudillo; A Biete; J M Bordas; A Novell; E Campo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  The diagnostic value of macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hakan Camlica; Derya Duranyildiz; Hilal Oguz; Ethem Nezih Oral; Vildan Yasasever
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 3.201

3.  Long-term prognostic study of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3) in breast cancer.

Authors:  Masahiro Uehara; Takayuki Kinoshita; Takashi Hojo; Sadako Akashi-Tanaka; Eriko Iwamoto; Takashi Fukutomi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Simple method for comparing reliability of two serum tumour markers in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  D P O'Brien; D B Gough; R Skehill; H Grimes; H F Given
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Utility of C-erbB-2 in tissue and in serum in the early diagnosis of recurrence in breast cancer patients: comparison with carcinoembryonic antigen and CA 15.3.

Authors:  R Molina; J Jo; G Zanón; X Filella; B Farrus; M Muñoz; M L Latre; J Pahisa; M Velasco; P Fernandez; J Estapé; A M Ballesta
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Elevated CA19-9 as the Most Significant Prognostic Factor in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Lu-Ning Zhang; Pu-Yun OuYang; Wei-Wei Xiao; Xin Yu; Kai-Yun You; Zhi-Fan Zeng; Rui-Hua Xu; Yuan-Hong Gao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.