Literature DB >> 22302419

On the covariance of two correlated log-odds ratios.

Pantelis G Bagos1.   

Abstract

In many applications two correlated estimates of an effect size need to be considered simultaneously to be combined or compared. Apparently, there is a need for calculating their covariance, which however requires access to the individual data that may not be available to a researcher performing the analysis. We present a simple and efficient method for calculating the covariance of two correlated log-odds ratios. The method is very simple, is based on the well-known large sample approximations, can be applied using only data that are available in the published reports and more importantly, is very general, because it is shown to encompass several previously derived estimates (multiple outcomes, multiple treatments, dose-response models, mutually exclusive outcomes, genetic association studies) as special cases. By encompassing the previous approaches in a unified framework, the method allows easily deriving estimates for the covariance concerning problems that were not easy to be obtained otherwise. We show that the method can be used to derive the covariance of log-odds ratios from matched and unmatched case-control studies that use the same cases, a situation that has been addressed in the past only using individual data. Future applications of the method are discussed.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22302419     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  5 in total

1.  An efficient gene-gene interaction test for genome-wide association studies in trio families.

Authors:  Pei-Yuan Sung; Yi-Ting Wang; Ya-Wen Yu; Ren-Hua Chung
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 2.  Meta-analysis methods for genome-wide association studies and beyond.

Authors:  Evangelos Evangelou; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 3.  Comparison of central adjudication of outcomes and onsite outcome assessment on treatment effect estimates.

Authors:  Lee Aymar Ndounga Diakou; Ludovic Trinquart; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Caroline Barnes; Amelie Yavchitz; Philippe Ravaud; Isabelle Boutron
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-03-10

Review 4.  Renal function and non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants in comparison with warfarin on safety and efficacy outcomes in atrial fibrillation patients: a systemic review and meta-regression analysis.

Authors:  Peter Brønnum Nielsen; Deirdre A Lane; Lars Hvilsted Rasmussen; Gregory Y H Lip; Torben Bjerregaard Larsen
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  A probabilistic method for testing and estimating selection differences between populations.

Authors:  Yungang He; Minxian Wang; Xin Huang; Ran Li; Hongyang Xu; Shuhua Xu; Li Jin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 9.043

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.