Literature DB >> 22302079

Utility of preoperative examination and magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of anterior vaginal wall masses.

Tirsit S Asfaw1, Joy A Greer, Parvati Ramchandani, Megan O Schimpf.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The clinical evaluation of anterior vaginal wall masses can present a dilemma, as there are no well-defined pathways for diagnosis and management. Our objective was to evaluate the role and accuracy of preoperative exam and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for these masses.
METHODS: We identified women with a mass using billing codes for 10 years. We compared data from the preoperative evaluation to postoperative pathology if available.
RESULTS: Analysis after chart review on 47 women was performed. Of the 34 women who had surgery, 28 (82.4%) also underwent an MRI. MRI diagnosis was accurate in 22/28 women compared to histology, inconclusive in 4, and inaccurate in 2. Preoperative diagnosis, including exam, MRI, and cystourethroscopy, had a diagnostic accuracy of 94.1% compared to postoperative diagnosis. The positive predictive value of MRI alone was 91.7%.
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative diagnosis using exam, MRI, and cystourethroscopy have a high diagnostic accuracy for anterior vaginal wall masses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22302079     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-012-1666-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  14 in total

1.  MR imaging and US of female urethral and periurethral disease.

Authors:  Vinika V Chaudhari; Maitraya K Patel; Michael Douek; Steven S Raman
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.333

2.  High-resolution MR imaging of the vagina.

Authors:  E S Siegelman; E K Outwater; M P Banner; P Ramchandani; T L Anderson; M D Schnall
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  Endoluminal magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of urethral diverticula in women.

Authors:  D S Blander; E S Rovner; M D Schnall; P Ramchandani; M P Banner; G A Broderick; A J Wein
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Periurethral and paravaginal anatomy: an endovaginal magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  M P Aronson; S M Bates; A F Jacoby; D Chelmow; G R Sant
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Urethral diverticula in women: discrepancies between magnetic resonance imaging and surgical findings.

Authors:  Doreen E Chung; Rajveer S Purohit; Jeffrey Girshman; Jerry G Blaivas
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Detection of urethral diverticula in women: comparison of a high resolution fast spin echo technique with double balloon urethrography.

Authors:  J D Neitlich; H E Foster; M G Glickman; R C Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Periurethral masses: etiology and diagnosis in a large series of women.

Authors:  Jerry G Blaivas; Adam J Flisser; Clifford B Bleustein; Georgia Panagopoulos
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Multiple vaginal wall cysts: diagnosis and surgical management.

Authors:  Clifford Y Wai; Marlene M Corton; Misha Miller; Joseph Sailors; Joseph I Schaffer
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Diagnosis of urethral diverticula in women: value of MR imaging.

Authors:  B Kim; H Hricak; E A Tanagho
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Vaginal cysts: a clinicopathological study of 41 cases.

Authors:  S Pradhan; H Tobon
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.762

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.