Literature DB >> 22302074

Marginal structural models for case-cohort study designs to estimate the association of antiretroviral therapy initiation with incident AIDS or death.

Stephen R Cole1, Michael G Hudgens, Phyllis C Tien, Kathryn Anastos, Lawrence Kingsley, Joan S Chmiel, Lisa P Jacobson.   

Abstract

To estimate the association of antiretroviral therapy initiation with incident acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) or death while accounting for time-varying confounding in a cost-efficient manner, the authors combined a case-cohort study design with inverse probability-weighted estimation of a marginal structural Cox proportional hazards model. A total of 950 adults who were positive for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 were followed in 2 US cohort studies between 1995 and 2007. In the full cohort, 211 AIDS cases or deaths occurred during 4,456 person-years. In an illustrative 20% random subcohort of 190 participants, 41 AIDS cases or deaths occurred during 861 person-years. Accounting for measured confounders and determinants of dropout by inverse probability weighting, the full cohort hazard ratio was 0.41 (95% confidence interval: 0.26, 0.65) and the case-cohort hazard ratio was 0.47 (95% confidence interval: 0.26, 0.83). Standard multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios were closer to the null, regardless of study design. The precision lost with the case-cohort design was modest given the cost savings. Results from Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated that the proposed approach yields approximately unbiased estimates of the hazard ratio with appropriate confidence interval coverage. Marginal structural model analysis of case-cohort study designs provides a cost-efficient design coupled with an accurate analytic method for research settings in which there is time-varying confounding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22302074      PMCID: PMC3282878          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwr346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  35 in total

1.  Computing the Cox model for case cohort designs.

Authors:  T M Therneau; H Li
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 2.  Invited commentary: propensity scores.

Authors:  M M Joffe; P R Rosenbaum
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Estimating causal effects from epidemiological data.

Authors:  Miguel A Hernán; James M Robins
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Estimability and estimation in case-referent studies.

Authors:  O Miettinen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Marginal structural models for the estimation of direct and indirect effects.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  Invited commentary: positivity in practice.

Authors:  Daniel Westreich; Stephen R Cole
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Use of a marginal structural model to determine the effect of aspirin on cardiovascular mortality in the Physicians' Health Study.

Authors:  Nancy R Cook; Stephen R Cole; Charles H Hennekens
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Robust variance estimation for the case-cohort design.

Authors:  W E Barlow
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Statistical models for prevalent cohort data.

Authors:  M C Wang; R Brookmeyer; N P Jewell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Case-cohort design in practice - experiences from the MORGAM Project.

Authors:  Sangita Kulathinal; Juha Karvanen; Olli Saarela; Kari Kuulasmaa
Journal:  Epidemiol Perspect Innov       Date:  2007-12-04
View more
  10 in total

1.  Marginal Structural Cox Models with Case-Cohort Sampling.

Authors:  Hana Lee; Michael G Hudgens; Jianwen Cai; Stephen R Cole
Journal:  Stat Sin       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.261

2.  Reflection on modern methods: combining weights for confounding and missing data.

Authors:  Rachael K Ross; Alexander Breskin; Tiffany L Breger; Daniel Westreich
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 9.685

3.  The Case for Case-Cohort: An Applied Epidemiologist's Guide to Reframing Case-Cohort Studies to Improve Usability and Flexibility.

Authors:  Katie M O'Brien; Kaitlyn G Lawrence; Alexander P Keil
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 4.860

4.  Interactive Effectiveness of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers or Their Combination on Survival of Hemodialysis Patients.

Authors:  Ryo Kido; Tadao Akizawa; Masafumi Fukagawa; Yoshihiro Onishi; Takuhiro Yamaguchi; Shunichi Fukuhara
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 3.754

5.  Exploring the Subtleties of Inverse Probability Weighting and Marginal Structural Models.

Authors:  Alexander Breskin; Stephen R Cole; Daniel Westreich
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  Doubly Robust and Efficient Estimation of Marginal Structural Models for the Hazard Function.

Authors:  Wenjing Zheng; Maya Petersen; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 0.968

7.  Decreased Susceptibility of Marginal Odds Ratios to Finite-sample Bias.

Authors:  Rachael K Ross; Stephen R Cole; David B Richardson
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 4.860

8.  Application of causal inference methods in the analyses of randomised controlled trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ruth E Farmer; Daphne Kounali; A Sarah Walker; Jelena Savović; Alison Richards; Margaret T May; Deborah Ford
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Metformin use and risk of cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes: a cohort study of primary care records using inverse probability weighting of marginal structural models.

Authors:  Ruth E Farmer; Deborah Ford; Rohini Mathur; Nish Chaturvedi; Rick Kaplan; Liam Smeeth; Krishnan Bhaskaran
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 7.196

10.  Cinacalcet use and the risk of cardiovascular events, fractures and mortality in chronic kidney disease patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism.

Authors:  Marie Evans; Shona Methven; Alessandro Gasparini; Peter Barany; Kate Birnie; Stephanie MacNeill; Margaret T May; Fergus J Caskey; Juan-Jesus Carrero
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.