Literature DB >> 22301822

Lyme disease in a British referral clinic.

L E Cottle1, E Mekonnen, M B J Beadsworth, A R O Miller, N J Beeching.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Concerns about over-diagnosis and inappropriate management of Lyme disease (LD) are well documented in North America and supported by clinical data. There are few parallel data on the situation in the UK. AIM: To describe the patterns of referral, investigation, diagnosis and treatment of patients with suspected LD referred to an infectious disease unit in Liverpool, UK. Previous management by National Health Service (NHS) and non-NHS practitioners was reviewed.
DESIGN: Descriptive study conducted by retrospective casenotes review.
METHODS: Retrospective casenotes review of adults referred with possible LD to an infectious disease unit in Liverpool, UK, over 5 years (2006-2010).
RESULTS: Of 115 patients, 27 (23%) were diagnosed with LD, 38 (33%) with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and 13 (11%) with other medical conditions. No specific diagnosis could be made in 38 (33%). At least 53 unnecessary antibiotic courses had been given by non-NHS practitioners; 21 unnecessary courses had been prescribed by NHS practitioners. Among 38 patients, 17 (45%) with CFS had been misdiagnosed as having LD by non-NHS practitioners.
CONCLUSION: A minority of referred patients had LD, while a third had CFS. LD is over-diagnosed by non-specialists, reflecting the complexities of clinical and/or laboratory diagnosis. Patients with CFS were susceptible to misdiagnosis in non-NHS settings, reinforcing concerns about missed opportunities for appropriate treatment for this group and about the use of inappropriate diagnostic modalities and anti-microbials in non-NHS settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22301822     DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcs003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  QJM        ISSN: 1460-2393


  7 in total

1.  Lyme disease: How reliable are serologic results?

Authors:  Dan Gregson; G Evans; David Patrick; William Bowie
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  A systematic review of Borrelia burgdorferi morphologic variants does not support a role in chronic Lyme disease.

Authors:  Paul M Lantos; Paul G Auwaerter; Gary P Wormser
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 3.  Relevance of chronic lyme disease to family medicine as a complex multidimensional chronic disease construct: a systematic review.

Authors:  Liesbeth Borgermans; Geert Goderis; Jan Vandevoorde; Dirk Devroey
Journal:  Int J Family Med       Date:  2014-11-24

4.  Characteristics and patient pathways of Lyme disease patients: a retrospective analysis of hospital episode data in England and Wales (1998-2015).

Authors:  John S P Tulloch; Valerie Decraene; Rob M Christley; Alan D Radford; Jenny C Warner; Roberto Vivancos
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Bull's-Eye and Nontarget Skin Lesions of Lyme Disease: An Internet Survey of Identification of Erythema Migrans.

Authors:  John N Aucott; Lauren A Crowder; Victoria Yedlin; Kathleen B Kortte
Journal:  Dermatol Res Pract       Date:  2012-10-24

6.  Lyme borreliosis in southern United Kingdom and a case for a new syndrome, chronic arthropod-borne neuropathy.

Authors:  M S Dryden; K Saeed; S Ogborn; P Swales
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.434

7.  Incidence of Lyme disease in the United Kingdom and association with fatigue: A population-based, historical cohort study.

Authors:  Florence Brellier; Mar Pujades-Rodriguez; Emma Powell; Kathleen Mudie; Eliana Mattos Lacerda; Luis Nacul; Kevin Wing
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 3.752

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.