Literature DB >> 22301605

Improvements in compliance with resuscitation bundles and achievement of end points after an educational program on the management of severe sepsis and septic shock.

Kyeongman Jeon1, Tae Gun Shin, Min Seob Sim, Gee Young Suh, So Yeon Lim, Hyoung Gon Song, Ik Joon Jo.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to determine whether an educational program could improve compliance with resuscitation bundles and the outcomes of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock and to evaluate which resuscitation bundle end points were associated with in-hospital mortality. This was a retrospective observational study of 366 patients (163 of historical controls and 203 of treatment patients) with severe sepsis or septic shock who presented to the emergency department between May 2007 and July 2009. Compliance with resuscitation bundles and achievement of the corresponding end points were compared before and after the 3-month educational program. Compliance with central line insertion and monitoring of central venous pressure (29% vs. 67%, P < 0.001) and central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO₂) (25% vs. 68%, P < 0.001) was significantly improved after the educational program. The achievement of target ScvO₂ within the first 6 h was significantly improved (62% vs. 88%, P < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was independently associated with adequate fluid challenge (odds ratio [OR], 0.161; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.046-0.559) and the achievement of target mean arterial pressure (OR, 0.056; 95% CI, 0.008-0.384) and ScvO₂ (OR, 0.251; 95% CI, 0.072-0.875) among the five sepsis resuscitation bundles. In conclusion, an educational program can improve compliance with resuscitation bundles and achievement of their corresponding end points.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22301605     DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e31824c31d1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shock        ISSN: 1073-2322            Impact factor:   3.454


  12 in total

1.  Improving Outcomes in Patients With Sepsis.

Authors:  Scott B Armen; Carol V Freer; John W Showalter; Tonya Crook; Cynthia J Whitener; Cheri West; Thomas E Terndrup; Marissa Grifasi; Christopher J DeFlitch; Christopher S Hollenbeak
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 1.852

2.  Variation in Emergency Department Adherence to Treatment Guidelines for Inpatient Pneumonia and Sepsis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Stacy A Trent; Zachary J Jarou; Edward P Havranek; Adit A Ginde; Jason S Haukoos
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 3.  Early goal-directed resuscitation of patients with septic shock: current evidence and future directions.

Authors:  Ravi G Gupta; Sarah M Hartigan; Markos G Kashiouris; Curtis N Sessler; Gonzalo M L Bearman
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 4.  Effect of performance improvement programs on compliance with sepsis bundles and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Elisa Damiani; Abele Donati; Giulia Serafini; Laura Rinaldi; Erica Adrario; Paolo Pelaia; Stefano Busani; Massimo Girardis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Septris: a novel, mobile, online, simulation game that improves sepsis recognition and management.

Authors:  Kambria H Evans; William Daines; Jamie Tsui; Matthew Strehlow; Paul Maggio; Lisa Shieh
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Prognostic Value of Lactate and Central Venous Oxygen Saturation after Early Resuscitation in Sepsis Patients.

Authors:  Young Kun Lee; Sung Yeon Hwang; Tae Gun Shin; Ik Joon Jo; Gee Young Suh; Kyeongman Jeon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Incidence of hypotension according to the discontinuation order of vasopressors in the management of septic shock: a prospective randomized trial (DOVSS).

Authors:  Kyeongman Jeon; Jae-Uk Song; Chi Ryang Chung; Jeong Hoon Yang; Gee Young Suh
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 8.  The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: research priorities for the administration, epidemiology, scoring and identification of sepsis.

Authors:  Mark E Nunnally; Ricard Ferrer; Greg S Martin; Ignacio Martin-Loeches; Flavia R Machado; Daniel De Backer; Craig M Coopersmith; Clifford S Deutschman
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2021-07-02

9.  The adverse effect of emergency department crowding on compliance with the resuscitation bundle in the management of severe sepsis and septic shock.

Authors:  Tae Gun Shin; Ik Joon Jo; Dae Jong Choi; Mun Ju Kang; Kyeongman Jeon; Gee Young Suh; Min Seob Sim; So Yeon Lim; Keun Jeong Song; Yeon Kwon Jeong
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 10.  Early goal-directed therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock: insights and comparisons to ProCESS, ProMISe, and ARISE.

Authors:  H Bryant Nguyen; Anja Kathrin Jaehne; Namita Jayaprakash; Matthew W Semler; Sara Hegab; Angel Coz Yataco; Geneva Tatem; Dhafer Salem; Steven Moore; Kamran Boka; Jasreen Kaur Gill; Jayna Gardner-Gray; Jacqueline Pflaum; Juan Pablo Domecq; Gina Hurst; Justin B Belsky; Raymond Fowkes; Ronald B Elkin; Steven Q Simpson; Jay L Falk; Daniel J Singer; Emanuel P Rivers
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.