BACKGROUND:Structured antiretroviral therapy interruption (TI) is discouraged because of poorer AIDS and non-AIDS-related outcomes, but is often inevitable in clinical practice. Certain strategies could reduce the emergence of resistance mutations related to TI. METHODS: A total of 106 HIV-1-infected patients on stable HAART with undetectable plasma viral load were randomized to therapy continuation (n=50) or CD4(+) T-cell-guided TI (n=56). Staggered interruption involved stopping non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) 7 days before the nucleoside backbone. Genotypic resistance testing (GRT) was performed on proviral DNA from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) at baseline and before each TI, and on plasma RNA after each TI. RESULTS: At baseline, GRT on PBMCs detected mutations in nine patients and only two major mutations were identified. GRT on plasma samples performed after TIs showed nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI), NNRTI and protease inhibitor major resistance associated mutations in 10/56, 3/46 and 1/8 patients receiving these drugs, respectively. Only in two patients had the same mutations been observed in GRT on PBMCs at baseline. Three patients presented virological failure after resumption of therapy, all receiving NNRTIs. In one of them, resistance mutations detected at failure had been also observed previously in GRT on plasma after TI. CONCLUSIONS: Staggered interruption of NNRTIs 7 days before the nucleoside backbone does not avoid resistance emergence completely, but does not necessarily lead to virological failure after treatment resumption. Plasma HIV-1 RNA genotype after the interruption and the patient's treatment history seem to be more useful than baseline proviral DNA genotype to assess the risk of virological failure after restarting therapy.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Structured antiretroviral therapy interruption (TI) is discouraged because of poorer AIDS and non-AIDS-related outcomes, but is often inevitable in clinical practice. Certain strategies could reduce the emergence of resistance mutations related to TI. METHODS: A total of 106 HIV-1-infectedpatients on stable HAART with undetectable plasma viral load were randomized to therapy continuation (n=50) or CD4(+) T-cell-guided TI (n=56). Staggered interruption involved stopping non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) 7 days before the nucleoside backbone. Genotypic resistance testing (GRT) was performed on proviral DNA from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) at baseline and before each TI, and on plasma RNA after each TI. RESULTS: At baseline, GRT on PBMCs detected mutations in nine patients and only two major mutations were identified. GRT on plasma samples performed after TIs showed nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI), NNRTI and protease inhibitor major resistance associated mutations in 10/56, 3/46 and 1/8 patients receiving these drugs, respectively. Only in two patients had the same mutations been observed in GRT on PBMCs at baseline. Three patients presented virological failure after resumption of therapy, all receiving NNRTIs. In one of them, resistance mutations detected at failure had been also observed previously in GRT on plasma after TI. CONCLUSIONS: Staggered interruption of NNRTIs 7 days before the nucleoside backbone does not avoid resistance emergence completely, but does not necessarily lead to virological failure after treatment resumption. Plasma HIV-1 RNA genotype after the interruption and the patient's treatment history seem to be more useful than baseline proviral DNA genotype to assess the risk of virological failure after restarting therapy.