Literature DB >> 22301340

Laparoscopy-assisted versus balloon enteroscopy-assisted ERCP in bariatric post-Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients.

Mitchal A Schreiner1, Lily Chang, Michael Gluck, Shayan Irani, S Ian Gan, John J Brandabur, Richard Thirlby, Ravi Moonka, Richard A Kozarek, Andrew S Ross.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data on balloon enteroscopy-assisted ERCP (BEA-ERCP) versus laparoscopy-assisted ERCP (LA-ERCP) in post-Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) patients are lacking.
OBJECTIVES: To compare BEA-ERCP with LA-ERCP in post-RYGB patients and to identify factors that predict therapeutic success with BEA-ERCP.
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review.
SETTING: A single North American tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: The review included 56 bariatric post-RYGB patients who underwent ERCP.
INTERVENTIONS: BEA-ERCP or LA-ERCP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Cannulation rate, therapeutic success, hospital stay, complications, procedure duration, endoscopist time, and cost.
RESULTS: A total of 32 patients underwent BEA-ERCP, and 24 underwent LA-ERCP. LA-ERCP was superior to BEA-ERCP in papilla identification (100% vs 72%, P = .005), cannulation rate (100% vs 59%, P < .001), and therapeutic success (100% vs 59%, P < .001). The total procedure time was shorter (P < .001) and endoscopist time was longer (P = .006) for BEA-ERCP. There was no difference in postprocedure hospital stay (P = .127) or complication rate (P = .392) between the 2 groups. In the BEA-ERCP group, in patients having a Roux limb + biliopancreatic (from ligament of Treitz to jejunojejunal anastomosis), a limb length less than 150 cm was associated with therapeutic success. Starting with BEA-ERCP and continuing with LA-ERCP after a failed BEA-ERCP saved $1015 compared with starting with LA-ERCP. LIMITATIONS: Single center, retrospective study.
CONCLUSIONS: In centers with expertise in deep enteroscopy and ERCP, post-RYGB patients with a Roux + ligament of Treitz to jejunojejunal anastomosis limb length less than 150 cm should first be offered deep enteroscopy-assisted ERCP. In patients with Roux + ligament of Treitz to jejunojejunal anastomosis (LTJJ) limb length 150 cm or longer, LA-ERCP should be the preferred approach because of the lack of need for a second procedure, equivalent morbidity and hospital stay, decreased endoscopist time, and decreased cost. Copyright Â
© 2012 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22301340     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.11.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  62 in total

Review 1.  Clinical nutrition in the hepatogastroenterology curriculum.

Authors:  Chris J J Mulder; Geert J A Wanten; Carol E Semrad; Palle B Jeppesen; Hinke M Kruizenga; Nicolette J Wierdsma; Matthijs E Grasman; Adriaan A van Bodegraven
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Difficult biliary access for ERCP.

Authors:  John Baillie
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2012-12

3.  Prevalence of Cholelithiasis and Choledocholithiasis in Morbidly Obese South Indian Patients and the Further Development of Biliary Calculus Disease After Sleeve Gastrectomy, Gastric Bypass and Mini Gastric Bypass.

Authors:  Tapas Mishra; Kona Kumari Lakshmi; Kiran Kumar Peddi
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass with Fundectomy and Gastric Remnant Exploration (LRYGBfse): Results at 5-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Giovanni Lesti; Alberto Aiolfi; Enrico Mozzi; Fabrizio Altorio; Ezio Lattuada; Francesco Lesti; Gianluca Bonitta; Marco Antonio Zappa
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 5.  Endoscopic management of post-liver transplant biliary complications.

Authors:  Mohit Girotra; Kaartik Soota; Jagpal S Klair; Shyam M Dang; Farshad Aduli
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-05-16

Review 6.  Innovations and techniques for balloon-enteroscope-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with altered gastrointestinal anatomy.

Authors:  Hiroshi Yamauchi; Mitsuhiro Kida; Hiroshi Imaizumi; Kosuke Okuwaki; Shiro Miyazawa; Tomohisa Iwai; Wasaburo Koizumi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  The role of endoscopy in the bariatric surgery patient.

Authors: 
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy after bariatric surgery: challenges and available techniques for reconstruction.

Authors:  Ioannis Hatzaras; Teviah E Sachs; Matthew Weiss; Christopher L Wolfgang; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 9.  Endoscopic Evaluation and Management of Late Complications After Bariatric Surgery: a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Vivek Kumbhari; Carel W le Roux; Ricardo V Cohen
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 10.  Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2016.

Authors:  Susumu Tazuma; Michiaki Unno; Yoshinori Igarashi; Kazuo Inui; Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Masahiro Kai; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Hiroyuki Maguchi; Toshiyuki Mori; Koji Yamaguchi; Shomei Ryozawa; Yuji Nimura; Naotaka Fujita; Keiichi Kubota; Junichi Shoda; Masami Tabata; Tetsuya Mine; Kentaro Sugano; Mamoru Watanabe; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 7.527

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.