Literature DB >> 22300811

Distinct neural networks underlie encoding of categorical versus coordinate spatial relations during active navigation.

Oliver Baumann1, Edgar Chan, Jason B Mattingley.   

Abstract

It has been proposed that spatial relations are encoded either categorically, such that the relative positions of objects are defined in prepositional terms; or in terms of visual coordinates, such that the precise distances between objects are represented. In humans, it has been assumed that a left hemisphere neural network subserves categorical representations, and that coordinate representations are right lateralised. However, evidence in support of this distinction has been garnered exclusively from tasks that involved static, two-dimensional (2D) arrays. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to identify neural circuits underlying categorical and coordinate representations during active spatial navigation. Activity in the categorical condition was significantly greater in the parietal cortex, whereas the coordinate condition revealed greater activity in medial temporal cortex and dorsal striatum. In addition, activity in the categorical condition was greater in parietal cortex within the left hemisphere than within the right. Our findings are consistent with analogous studies in rodents, and support the suggestion of distinct neural circuits underlying categorical and coordinate representations during active spatial navigation. The findings also support the claim of a left hemispheric preponderance for the processing of categorical spatial relations. Copyright Â
© 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22300811     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  13 in total

1.  Categorical and coordinate spatial task performance in inconsistent-handers versus consistent-right-handers: part II.

Authors:  Ruth E Propper; Andrew Wolfarth; Tad T Brunye; Christophe Carlei; Sophia Lall
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2019-08-28

2.  Adaptation of the Arizona Cognitive Task Battery for use with the Ts65Dn mouse model (Mus musculus) of Down syndrome.

Authors:  Michael R Hunsaker; Genevieve K Smith; Raymond P Kesner
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 2.231

3.  Enhanced verbal abilities in the congenitally blind.

Authors:  Valeria Occelli; Simon Lacey; Careese Stephens; Lotfi B Merabet; K Sathian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  SPG7 and Impaired Emotional Communication.

Authors:  Linwei Zhang; Karen N McFarland; S H Subramony; Kenneth M Heilman; Tetsuo Ashizawa
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Development of Landmark Use for Navigation in Children: Effects of Age, Sex, Working Memory and Landmark Type.

Authors:  Anne H van Hoogmoed; Joost Wegman; Danielle van den Brink; Gabriele Janzen
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-06-13

Review 6.  Allocentric directional processing in the rodent and human retrosplenial cortex.

Authors:  Rebecca Knight; Robin Hayman
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Focusing narrowly or broadly attention when judging categorical and coordinate spatial relations: a MEG study.

Authors:  Raffaella Franciotti; Stefania D'Ascenzo; Alberto Di Domenico; Marco Onofrj; Luca Tommasi; Bruno Laeng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Influence of Landmarks on Wayfinding and Brain Connectivity in Immersive Virtual Reality Environment.

Authors:  Greeshma Sharma; Yash Kaushal; Sushil Chandra; Vijander Singh; Alok P Mittal; Varun Dutt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-07-20

Review 9.  Dissociable roles of the hippocampus and parietal cortex in processing of coordinate and categorical spatial information.

Authors:  Oliver Baumann; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Distributed cognitive maps reflecting real distances between places and views in the human brain.

Authors:  Valentina Sulpizio; Giorgia Committeri; Gaspare Galati
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.