INTRODUCTION: In non-surgical candidates with solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) and no histological confirmation, optimal management remains uncertain. METHODS: Between February 2005 and February 2011 we treated 298 lung cancers with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), including SPNs clinically diagnosed as lung cancer (CDLC). Among them, we extracted patients treated with a total dose of 40-50 Gy per 5 fractions and followed up more than 6 months. Patients who had a history of previously treated lung cancer, or were diagnosed pathologically, or suspected as having small-cell lung cancer or large cell neuroendcrine cancer were excluded from this study. The remaining patients were divided into two groups; CDLC and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and their outcomes were assessed and compared. RESULTS: Fifty-eight CDLC and 115 NSCLC patients were included in this study. The proportions of female and inoperable cases were significantly higher in the CDLC group. Other characteristics, including T stage and standard uptake value, were well balanced. Median follow-up durations were 20.2 (range, 6.0-58.8) and 21.2 (range, 6-63.7) months, respectively. The 3-year local control, regional-free, metastasis-free, progression-free, cause-specific survival, and overall survival rates were 80% and 87% (p = 0.73), 88% and 91% (p = 0.72), 70% and 74% (p = 0.57), 64% and 67% (p = 0.45), 74% and 71% (p = 0.17), 54% and 57% (p = 0.48), respectively. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the treatment outcome of CDLC group was almost identical to that of NSCLC and that few benign lesions seemed to be included. We advocate that SBRT can be legitimately applied to CDLC, provided that they are carefully diagnosed by integrating various clinical findings.
INTRODUCTION: In non-surgical candidates with solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) and no histological confirmation, optimal management remains uncertain. METHODS: Between February 2005 and February 2011 we treated 298 lung cancers with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), including SPNs clinically diagnosed as lung cancer (CDLC). Among them, we extracted patients treated with a total dose of 40-50 Gy per 5 fractions and followed up more than 6 months. Patients who had a history of previously treated lung cancer, or were diagnosed pathologically, or suspected as having small-cell lung cancer or large cell neuroendcrine cancer were excluded from this study. The remaining patients were divided into two groups; CDLC and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and their outcomes were assessed and compared. RESULTS: Fifty-eight CDLC and 115 NSCLCpatients were included in this study. The proportions of female and inoperable cases were significantly higher in the CDLC group. Other characteristics, including T stage and standard uptake value, were well balanced. Median follow-up durations were 20.2 (range, 6.0-58.8) and 21.2 (range, 6-63.7) months, respectively. The 3-year local control, regional-free, metastasis-free, progression-free, cause-specific survival, and overall survival rates were 80% and 87% (p = 0.73), 88% and 91% (p = 0.72), 70% and 74% (p = 0.57), 64% and 67% (p = 0.45), 74% and 71% (p = 0.17), 54% and 57% (p = 0.48), respectively. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the treatment outcome of CDLC group was almost identical to that of NSCLC and that few benign lesions seemed to be included. We advocate that SBRT can be legitimately applied to CDLC, provided that they are carefully diagnosed by integrating various clinical findings.
Authors: Dawn Owen; Kenneth R Olivier; Charles S Mayo; Robert C Miller; Kathryn Nelson; Heather Bauer; Paul D Brown; Sean S Park; Daniel J Ma; Yolanda I Garces Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2015-02-18 Impact factor: 3.481