Literature DB >> 22300611

Birthing outside the system: perceptions of risk amongst Australian women who have freebirths and high risk homebirths.

Melanie Jackson1, Hannah Dahlen, Virginia Schmied.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: homebirth for low risk women attended by competent midwives who are networked within a responsive maternity care service is supported by research as safe. Concerns exist over the safety of homebirths which are unattended by trained health professionals, or for women with medically defined risk factors. Both these birth choices are unsupported by mainstream maternity care options in Australia and therefore represent birth choices considered to be 'outside the system'. AIM: to explore the perceptions of risk held by women who choose to have a freebirth (birth at home intentionally unattended by a trained birth attendant) or a 'high-risk' homebirth (professionally attended home birth where a mother or baby has medically defined risk factors). Both of these choices are considered to be 'outside the system'.
METHODS: twenty women were interviewed about their choice to 'birth outside the system', nine choosing freebirth and 11 choosing to have an attended homebirth despite the presence of medically defined risk factors; three were primiparous and seventeen were multiparous. Women intending to have, or having had a freebirth or high risk homebirth, were interviewed using semi-structured interviews. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis.
FINDINGS: the three main themes about perceptions of risk that were evident in this study were: 'Birth always has an element of risk', 'The hospital is not the safest place to have a baby'; and 'interference is a risk'. DISCUSSION: the participants acknowledge that birth is a time in life that carries an element of risk. They perceive that hospital represents a more risky place to give birth than at home and that interventions and interruptions during labour and birth increase risk. Women who birth outside the system perceive the risks of birth in hospital differently to most women. These women feel that by birthing outside the system they are making a choice that protects them and their babies from the risks associated with birthing in hospital and thus provides them with the best and safest birthing option.
CONCLUSION: in pursuing the best for themselves and their babies, women who birth outside the system spent a lot of time and energy considering the risks and weighing these up. For them birth in hospital is considered less safe than birth at home.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22300611     DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2011.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  14 in total

1.  Managing the pain of labour: factors associated with the use of labour pain management for pregnant Australian women.

Authors:  Amie Steel; Jon Adams; David Sibbritt; Alex Broom; Cindy Gallois; Jane Frawley
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Perinatal and maternal outcomes in planned home and obstetric unit births in women at 'higher risk' of complications: secondary analysis of the Birthplace national prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Y Li; J Townend; R Rowe; P Brocklehurst; M Knight; L Linsell; A Macfarlane; C McCourt; M Newburn; N Marlow; D Pasupathy; M Redshaw; J Sandall; L Silverton; J Hollowell
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 6.531

3.  The Canadian birth place study: examining maternity care provider attitudes and interprofessional conflict around planned home birth.

Authors:  Saraswathi Vedam; Kathrin Stoll; Laura Schummers; Nichole Fairbrother; Michael C Klein; Dana Thordarson; Jude Kornelsen; Shafik Dharamsi; Judy Rogers; Robert Liston; Janusz Kaczorowski
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Why do women choose an unregulated birth worker to birth at home in Australia: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Christine Rigg; Virginia Schmied; Kath Peters; Hannah Grace Dahlen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Women's descriptions of childbirth trauma relating to care provider actions and interactions.

Authors:  Rachel Reed; Rachael Sharman; Christian Inglis
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Planned private homebirth in Victoria 2000-2015: a retrospective cohort study of Victorian perinatal data.

Authors:  Miranda L Davies-Tuck; Euan M Wallace; Mary-Ann Davey; Vickie Veitch; Jeremy Oats
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  A Qualitative Study to Explore the Barriers for Nonadherence to Referral to Hospital Births by Women with High-Risk Pregnancies in Nepal.

Authors:  Sushma Rajbanshi; Mohd Noor Norhayati; Nik Hussain Nik Hazlina
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Women's reasons for, and experiences of, choosing a homebirth following a caesarean section.

Authors:  Hazel Keedle; Virginia Schmied; Elaine Burns; Hannah G Dahlen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  The Mothers on Respect (MOR) index: measuring quality, safety, and human rights in childbirth.

Authors:  Saraswathi Vedam; Kathrin Stoll; Nicholas Rubashkin; Kelsey Martin; Zoe Miller-Vedam; Hermine Hayes-Klein; Ganga Jolicoeur
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2017-01-19

10.  Born before arrival in NSW, Australia (2000-2011): a linked population data study of incidence, location, associated factors and maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  Charlene Eliza Thornton; Hannah Grace Dahlen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.