BACKGROUND: ERG (ETS regulated gene) protein expression has been shown to reflect ERG genomic rearrangements in prostate cancer (PCA). However, ERG protein expression prognostic value has not been yet investigated. DESIGN: ERG protein expression was investigated in a cohort of 312 men with PCA diagnosed in transurethral resection of the prostate. RESULTS: ERG expression was detected in 76/293 (25.9%) of patients. Overall ERG expression was associated with Gleason score (GS) (p<0.0001), tumour volume (p=0.04) and with cancer specific mortality (p=0.15). Low ERG intensity was significantly associated with higher GS (p=0.02) and marginally with cancer specific mortality (p=0.11). The association with cancer specific mortality was more significant in patients without any hormonal manipulation (p=0.02). Multivariate Cox model using GS, tumour volume and ERG intensity to predict time to cancer specific death yielded a marginally significant effect for high versus low ERG protein expression (hazard ratio (HR)=0.36; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.10-1.38; p=0.14) and a non-significant effect for GS >7 (HR=4.85; 95%CI: 0.48, 48.65; p=0.18). Men with ERG expression showed longer free progression time to castration resistant disease compared to men with no ERG expression (mean 11.39 versus 6.1 months, p=0.08). CONCLUSION: We report significant association between ERG protein levels and each of GS, progression to castration resistant and cancer specific mortality. High ERG intensity was associated with lower GS, better overall survival and longer free progression times to castration resistant disease. ERG protein levels may have prognostic and therapeutic role in PCA and should be investigated in future studies. Copyright Â
BACKGROUND:ERG (ETS regulated gene) protein expression has been shown to reflect ERG genomic rearrangements in prostate cancer (PCA). However, ERG protein expression prognostic value has not been yet investigated. DESIGN:ERG protein expression was investigated in a cohort of 312 men with PCA diagnosed in transurethral resection of the prostate. RESULTS:ERG expression was detected in 76/293 (25.9%) of patients. Overall ERG expression was associated with Gleason score (GS) (p<0.0001), tumour volume (p=0.04) and with cancer specific mortality (p=0.15). Low ERG intensity was significantly associated with higher GS (p=0.02) and marginally with cancer specific mortality (p=0.11). The association with cancer specific mortality was more significant in patients without any hormonal manipulation (p=0.02). Multivariate Cox model using GS, tumour volume and ERG intensity to predict time to cancer specific death yielded a marginally significant effect for high versus low ERG protein expression (hazard ratio (HR)=0.36; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.10-1.38; p=0.14) and a non-significant effect for GS >7 (HR=4.85; 95%CI: 0.48, 48.65; p=0.18). Men with ERG expression showed longer free progression time to castration resistant disease compared to men with no ERG expression (mean 11.39 versus 6.1 months, p=0.08). CONCLUSION: We report significant association between ERG protein levels and each of GS, progression to castration resistant and cancer specific mortality. High ERG intensity was associated with lower GS, better overall survival and longer free progression times to castration resistant disease. ERG protein levels may have prognostic and therapeutic role in PCA and should be investigated in future studies. Copyright Â
Authors: Ramy A Abdelsalam; Ibrahim Khalifeh; Alan Box; Maria Kalantarian; Sunita Ghosh; Hatem Abou-Ouf; Tamara Lotfi; Mohammed Shahait; Nallasivam Palanisamy; Tarek A Bismar Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2020-04-30 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Henk van der Poel; Laurence Klotz; Gerald Andriole; Abdel-Rahmène Azzouzi; Anders Bjartell; Olivier Cussenot; Freddy Hamdy; Markus Graefen; Paolo Palma; Arturo Rodriguez Rivera; Christian G Stief Journal: World J Urol Date: 2015-06-03 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Andreas Pettersson; Rebecca E Graff; Scott R Bauer; Michael J Pitt; Rosina T Lis; Edward C Stack; Neil E Martin; Lauren Kunz; Kathryn L Penney; Azra H Ligon; Catherine Suppan; Richard Flavin; Howard D Sesso; Jennifer R Rider; Christopher Sweeney; Meir J Stampfer; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Philip W Kantoff; Martin G Sanda; Edward L Giovannucci; Eric L Ding; Massimo Loda; Lorelei A Mucci Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2012-06-26 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Hatem Abou-Ouf; Mohammed Alshalalfa; Mandeep Takhar; Nicholas Erho; Bryan Donnelly; Elai Davicioni; R Jeffrey Karnes; Tarek A Bismar Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2018-03-06 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: E Sophie Spencer; Richard B Johnston; Ryan R Gordon; Jared M Lucas; Cigdem Himmetoglu Ussakli; Antonio Hurtado-Coll; Shiv Srivastava; Peter S Nelson; Christopher R Porter Journal: Prostate Date: 2013-01-17 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Amal Almami; Samar A Hegazy; Arash Nabbi; Mohammed Alshalalfa; Asma Salman; Hatem Abou-Ouf; Karl Riabowol; Tarek A Bismar Journal: Tumour Biol Date: 2016-01-23