Literature DB >> 22300588

ERG protein expression reflects hormonal treatment response and is associated with Gleason score and prostate cancer specific mortality.

Tarek A Bismar1, Michael Dolph, Liang-Hong Teng, Shuhong Liu, Bryan Donnelly.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: ERG (ETS regulated gene) protein expression has been shown to reflect ERG genomic rearrangements in prostate cancer (PCA). However, ERG protein expression prognostic value has not been yet investigated.
DESIGN: ERG protein expression was investigated in a cohort of 312 men with PCA diagnosed in transurethral resection of the prostate.
RESULTS: ERG expression was detected in 76/293 (25.9%) of patients. Overall ERG expression was associated with Gleason score (GS) (p<0.0001), tumour volume (p=0.04) and with cancer specific mortality (p=0.15). Low ERG intensity was significantly associated with higher GS (p=0.02) and marginally with cancer specific mortality (p=0.11). The association with cancer specific mortality was more significant in patients without any hormonal manipulation (p=0.02). Multivariate Cox model using GS, tumour volume and ERG intensity to predict time to cancer specific death yielded a marginally significant effect for high versus low ERG protein expression (hazard ratio (HR)=0.36; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.10-1.38; p=0.14) and a non-significant effect for GS >7 (HR=4.85; 95%CI: 0.48, 48.65; p=0.18). Men with ERG expression showed longer free progression time to castration resistant disease compared to men with no ERG expression (mean 11.39 versus 6.1 months, p=0.08).
CONCLUSION: We report significant association between ERG protein levels and each of GS, progression to castration resistant and cancer specific mortality. High ERG intensity was associated with lower GS, better overall survival and longer free progression times to castration resistant disease. ERG protein levels may have prognostic and therapeutic role in PCA and should be investigated in future studies. Copyright Â
© 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22300588     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  26 in total

1.  Molecular characterization of prostate cancer in Middle Eastern population highlights differences with Western populations with prognostic implication.

Authors:  Ramy A Abdelsalam; Ibrahim Khalifeh; Alan Box; Maria Kalantarian; Sunita Ghosh; Hatem Abou-Ouf; Tamara Lotfi; Mohammed Shahait; Nallasivam Palanisamy; Tarek A Bismar
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  High alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) is associated with ERG expression and with adverse clinical outcome in patients with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Adrian Box; Mohammed Alshalalfa; Samar A Hegazy; Bryan Donnelly; Tarek A Bismar
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-06-07

3.  Role of active surveillance and focal therapy in low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancers.

Authors:  Henk van der Poel; Laurence Klotz; Gerald Andriole; Abdel-Rahmène Azzouzi; Anders Bjartell; Olivier Cussenot; Freddy Hamdy; Markus Graefen; Paolo Palma; Arturo Rodriguez Rivera; Christian G Stief
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  The TMPRSS2:ERG rearrangement, ERG expression, and prostate cancer outcomes: a cohort study and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andreas Pettersson; Rebecca E Graff; Scott R Bauer; Michael J Pitt; Rosina T Lis; Edward C Stack; Neil E Martin; Lauren Kunz; Kathryn L Penney; Azra H Ligon; Catherine Suppan; Richard Flavin; Howard D Sesso; Jennifer R Rider; Christopher Sweeney; Meir J Stampfer; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Philip W Kantoff; Martin G Sanda; Edward L Giovannucci; Eric L Ding; Massimo Loda; Lorelei A Mucci
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Validation of a 10-gene molecular signature for predicting biochemical recurrence and clinical metastasis in localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hatem Abou-Ouf; Mohammed Alshalalfa; Mandeep Takhar; Nicholas Erho; Bryan Donnelly; Elai Davicioni; R Jeffrey Karnes; Tarek A Bismar
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 6.  ERG expression in prostate cancer: biological relevance and clinical implication.

Authors:  Hatem Abou-Ouf; Liena Zhao; Tarek A Bismar
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  ERG expression is associated with increased risk of biochemical relapse following radical prostatectomy in early onset prostate cancer.

Authors:  K-C Huang; M Dolph; B Donnelly; T A Bismar
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 8.  Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  Prognostic value of ERG oncoprotein in prostate cancer recurrence and cause-specific mortality.

Authors:  E Sophie Spencer; Richard B Johnston; Ryan R Gordon; Jared M Lucas; Cigdem Himmetoglu Ussakli; Antonio Hurtado-Coll; Shiv Srivastava; Peter S Nelson; Christopher R Porter
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 4.104

10.  ING3 is associated with increased cell invasion and lethal outcome in ERG-negative prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Amal Almami; Samar A Hegazy; Arash Nabbi; Mohammed Alshalalfa; Asma Salman; Hatem Abou-Ouf; Karl Riabowol; Tarek A Bismar
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-01-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.