Literature DB >> 22299765

Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for the prescription of antidepressant drugs during pregnancy.

Fabiano Santos1, Ivan Sola, David Rigau, Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez, Pamela Seron, Pablo Alonso-Coello, Anick Berard, Xavier Bonfill.   

Abstract

Antidepressant use during the gestational period remains a controversial issue. The objective of this study was to appraise the quality of the available clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) that includes recommendations for antidepressant use during pregnancy. We systematically searched for documents published between January 2000 and September 2010 in MEDLINE / TRIP database and on clearing houses and main scientific societies' websites. Four appraisers evaluated each guideline using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation tool (AGREE II). Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated as an overall indicator of agreement. Twelve CPGs were included from a total of 539 references. Only two guidelines were specifically addressed to pregnant women. The overall agreement among reviewers was high (ICC: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.86-0.98). The mean scores and standard deviation (SD) for each of the AGREE II domains were: scope and purpose: 84.4% (12); stakeholder involvement: 67.4% (29.8); rigor of development: 68.6% (19.8); clarity and presentation: 83.4% (17.4); applicability: 44% (37.3); and editorial independence: 62.1% (30.4). After standardizing the scores of the 12 guidelines, 5 were considered as being "recommended", 5 as "recommended with modifications, and 2 as "not recommended". Among the five recommended guidelines, two were specifically conceived to the gestational period. CPGs containing recommendations for antidepressant use during pregnancy were of moderate to high quality. Future guidelines should take into account the observed drawbacks in some domains, and specifically focus a more in depth approach of depression during pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22299765     DOI: 10.2174/157488412799218842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 1574-8847


  5 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines on vitamin D replacement in bariatric surgery: Identification and systematic appraisal.

Authors:  Marlene Toufic Chakhtoura; Nancy Nakhoul; Elie A Akl; Christos S Mantzoros; Ghada A El Hajj Fuleihan
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 8.694

Review 2.  Guideline appraisal with AGREE II: Systematic review of the current evidence on how users handle the 2 overall assessments.

Authors:  Wiebke Hoffmann-Eßer; Ulrich Siering; Edmund A M Neugebauer; Anne Catharina Brockhaus; Ulrike Lampert; Michaela Eikermann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Guidelines on treatment of perinatal depression with antidepressants: An international review.

Authors:  Nina M Molenaar; Astrid M Kamperman; Philip Boyce; Veerle Bergink
Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 5.744

4.  An evaluation of web-based clinical practice guidelines for managing problems associated with cannabis use.

Authors:  Melissa M Norberg; Michael W Turner; Sally E Rooke; Julia M Langton; Peter J Gates
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Guideline appraisal with AGREE II: online survey of the potential influence of AGREE II items on overall assessment of guideline quality and recommendation for use.

Authors:  Wiebke Hoffmann-Eßer; Ulrich Siering; Edmund A M Neugebauer; Anne Catharina Brockhaus; Natalie McGauran; Michaela Eikermann
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.