Literature DB >> 22299293

Rate of complications and conversions after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy.

Hajrudin Halilovic1, Sefik Hasukic, Ervin Matovic, Goran Imamovic.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although many advantages of laparoscopic method in regard to open one have been already proved, both surgical methods may cause a certain number of complications. The goal of the study is to answer the question: Is Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC) safer and more satisfactory method than open cholecystectomy (OC) concerning number, type and seriousness of complications? DESIGN AND
SETTING: Prospective, the research includes all patients in Bihać Cantonal Hospital during 2007, who had cholecystectomy, laparoscopic or open, because of the gallbladder calculosus.
METHODS: The study has included 476 patients who had cholecystectomy and who satisfied standards for this study. Of the total number of patients, 293 of them had laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 183 open cholecystectomy. Total number of complications is established for each group of patients.
RESULTS: The study has shown that there were more complications in patients operated by open method than in those operated by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (p < 0.0001). Intraoperative bleeding was found in 1.63% of patients with open and 0.68% with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Postoperative collection in abdomen were found in 2.18% of patients with open and 1.02% with laparoscopic method. The most common complications for open cholecystectomy were: infection (2.73%), hematoma in the wound (2.73%) and urine retention (2.18%).
CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that LC and OC are comparable procedures for the treatment of gall stone disease in terms of complications, results of this study demonstrate that LC is essentially a safe procedure with low complicatins, morbidity and mortality rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22299293     DOI: 10.5455/medarh.2011.65.336-338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Arh        ISSN: 0350-199X


  4 in total

1.  Cholecystectomy and Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs): patient classification and hospital reimbursement in 11 European countries.

Authors:  Gerli Paat-Ahi; Ain Aaviksoo; Maria Swiderek
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2014-11-13

Review 2.  Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2016.

Authors:  Susumu Tazuma; Michiaki Unno; Yoshinori Igarashi; Kazuo Inui; Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Masahiro Kai; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Hiroyuki Maguchi; Toshiyuki Mori; Koji Yamaguchi; Shomei Ryozawa; Yuji Nimura; Naotaka Fujita; Keiichi Kubota; Junichi Shoda; Masami Tabata; Tetsuya Mine; Kentaro Sugano; Mamoru Watanabe; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 7.527

3.  TOTAL COST OF HOSPITALIZATION OF PATIENTS UNDERGOING ELECTIVE LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY RELATED TO NUTRITIONAL STATUS.

Authors:  Francisco Julimar Correia de Menezes; Lara Gadelha Luna de Menezes; Guilherme Pinheiro Ferreira da Silva; Antônio Aldo Melo-Filho; Daniel Hardy Melo; Carlos Antonio Bruno da Silva
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

Review 4.  Early cross-sectional imaging following open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a primer for radiologists.

Authors:  Massimo Tonolini; Anna Maria Ierardi; Francesca Patella; Gianpaolo Carrafiello
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2018-11-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.