Literature DB >> 22298660

Capecitabine non-adherence: exploration of magnitude, nature and contributing factors.

Debi Bhattacharya1, Claire Easthall, Kerri Anne Willoughby, Matthew Small, Steven Watson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The prescribing of oral chemotherapy agents previously available only in the intravenous formulation, such as capecitabine, has afforded many benefits including reduced administration costs and improved patient acceptability. However, it has introduced the new challenge of ensuring patient adherence to therapy. It is therefore necessary to quantify adherence, and with a view to improving services, explore factors that may impact on medication taking behavior.
METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of breast or colorectal cancer and prescribed capecitabine were recruited from a UK teaching hospital. Data regarding self-reported adherence, beliefs about medicines, side effects, and satisfaction with information received about capecitabine were recorded.
RESULTS: Non-adherence was reported by 23.3% of the 43 participants. Capecitabine therapy was perceived necessary by 97.6%, but almost one-third of participants had strong concerns. Side effects were reported by 80% of participants, with Palmar-Plantar erythrodysesthesia and fatigue most troubling participants. Complete satisfaction with information received was reported by 65% of participants; however, dissatisfaction about how to tell if capecitabine is working and the proposed duration of therapy was expressed by 42.9% and 37.3% of participants, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to capecitabine is high with a strong conviction that the therapy is necessary. However, concerns were expressed regarding the experience of side effects. Patients have unmet information needs regarding the processes involved with monitoring capecitabine efficacy and determination of therapy duration. Healthcare professionals may therefore wish to consider a greater focus on involving patients in the monitoring of their care with respect to efficacy and planned treatment schedules.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22298660     DOI: 10.1177/1078155211436022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract        ISSN: 1078-1552            Impact factor:   1.809


  27 in total

1.  Retrospective comparison of CAPOX and FOLFOX dose intensity, toxicity, and clinical outcomes in the treatment of metastatic colon cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan M Loree; Karen E Mulder; Sunita Ghosh; Jennifer L Spratlin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2014-06

2.  Development of the National Cancer Institute's patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE).

Authors:  Ethan Basch; Bryce B Reeve; Sandra A Mitchell; Steven B Clauser; Lori M Minasian; Amylou C Dueck; Tito R Mendoza; Jennifer Hay; Thomas M Atkinson; Amy P Abernethy; Deborah W Bruner; Charles S Cleeland; Jeff A Sloan; Ram Chilukuri; Paul Baumgartner; Andrea Denicoff; Diane St Germain; Ann M O'Mara; Alice Chen; Joseph Kelaghan; Antonia V Bennett; Laura Sit; Lauren Rogak; Allison Barz; Diane B Paul; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  A Systematic Review of Adherence to Oral Antineoplastic Therapies.

Authors:  Joseph A Greer; Nicole Amoyal; Lauren Nisotel; Joel N Fishbein; James MacDonald; Jamie Stagl; Inga Lennes; Jennifer S Temel; Steven A Safren; William F Pirl
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-02-26

4.  Beliefs about GI medications and adherence to pharmacotherapy in functional GI disorder outpatients.

Authors:  Benjamin Cassell; C Prakash Gyawali; Vladimir M Kushnir; Britt M Gott; Billy D Nix; Gregory S Sayuk
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 5.  Oral antineoplastic agents: how do we care about adherence?

Authors:  Marie Barillet; Virginie Prevost; Florence Joly; Bénédicte Clarisse
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 6.  Adherence to imatinib therapy in gastrointestinal stromal tumors and chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Jasem Al-Barrak; Winson Y Cheung
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 7.  Oral cancer chemotherapy adherence and adherence assessment tools: a report from North Central Cancer Group Trial N0747 and a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Krishna Patel; Nathan R Foster; Ann Farrell; Nguyet Anh Le-Lindqwister; Josy Mathew; Brian Costello; John Reynolds; Jeffrey P Meyers; Aminah Jatoi
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  The association between patients' perceived continuity of care and beliefs about oral anticancer treatment.

Authors:  Orit Cohen Castel; Efrat Shadmi; Lital Keinan-Boker; Tal Granot; Khaled Karkabi; Efrat Dagan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Gemcitabine and capecitabine for advanced biliary cancer.

Authors:  Emmanuel Gabriel; Shipra Gandhi; Kristopher Attwood; Boris Kuvshinoff; Steven Hochwald; Renuka Iyer
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-08

10.  Side Effects, Self-Management Activities, and Adherence to Oral Anticancer Agents.

Authors:  Yun Jiang; Karen E Wickersham; Xingyu Zhang; Debra L Barton; Karen B Farris; John C Krauss; Marcelline R Harris
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.