Literature DB >> 22298127

The inconsistency of inconsistency scales: a comparison of two widely used measures.

Natalia L Nikolova1, Melissa C Hendry, Kevin S Douglas, John F Edens, Scott O Lilienfeld.   

Abstract

This study compared the inconsistent responding validity scales of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) and the Psychopathic Personality Inventory (PPI)/PPI-Revised (PPI-R) in two correctional samples to determine the extent to which they overlap in identifying invalid profiles. Results revealed substantial differences in the way the inconsistent responding validity scales of these measures performed. In particular, the PAI identified far fewer participants as having responded inconsistently compared with the PPI/PPI-R. We discuss the implications of our findings for clinical practice, and potential concerns with the use of a single measure to identify inconsistent responding in clinical practice and research.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22298127     DOI: 10.1002/bsl.1996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Sci Law        ISSN: 0735-3936


  2 in total

1.  Collateral Report of Psychopathy: Convergent and Divergent Validity of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Short Form.

Authors:  Susan Iyican; Johannah M Sommer; Sheetal Kini; Julia C Babcock
Journal:  J Forens Psychiatry Psychol       Date:  2015-07-01

2.  The effect of trial repetition and problem size on the consistency of decision making.

Authors:  Vladimír Bureš; Daniela Ponce; Pavel Čech; Karel Mls
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.