Literature DB >> 22297602

Resistance/response molecular signature for oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma.

Amritha Suresh1, Muhil Vannan, Dhanya Kumaran, Zeynep H Gümüs, Priya Sivadas, Elango Erode Murugaian, Vikram Kekatpure, Subramanian Iyer, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Moni Abraham Kuriakose.   

Abstract

Worldwide, the incidence of oral tongue cancer is on the rise, adding to the existing burden due to prevailing low survival and high recurrence rates. This study uses high-throughput expression profiling to identify candidate markers of resistance/response in patients with oral tongue cancer. Analysis of primary and post-treatment samples (12 tumor and 8 normal) by the Affymetrix platform (HG U133 plus 2) identified 119 genes as differentially regulated in recurrent tumors. The study groups had distinct profiles, with induction of immune response and apoptotic pathways in the non-recurrent and metastatic/invasiveness pathways in the recurrent group. Validation was carried out in tissues by Quantitative Real-Time PCR (QPCR) (n=30) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) (n=35) and in saliva by QPCR (n=37). The markers, COL5A1, HBB, IGLA and TSC individually and COL5A1 and HBB in combination had the best predictive power for treatment response in the patients. A subset of markers identified (COL5A1, ABCG1, MMP1, IL8, FN1) could be detected in the saliva of patients with oral cancers with their combined sensitivity and specificity being 0.65 and 0.87 respectively. The study thus emphasizes the extreme prognostic value of exploring markers of treatment resistance that are expressed in both tissue and saliva.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22297602      PMCID: PMC3826923          DOI: 10.3233/DMA-2012-0860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Markers        ISSN: 0278-0240            Impact factor:   3.434


  5 in total

1.  Oral sampling methods are associated with differences in immune marker concentrations.

Authors:  Carole Fakhry; Fares Qeadan; Robert H Gilman; Pablo Yori; Margaret Kosek; Nicole Patterson; David W Eisele; Christine G Gourin; Chandala Chitguppi; Morgan Marks; Patti Gravitt
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Quantitative immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis of biomarker combinations for human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jiebing Gao; Xinglin Li; Dan Li; Ye Liu; Wanwei Cao; Xiaoyun Chen; Zhijun Li; Xiaojing Wang; Qingdong Cao; Tukang Peng; Hongjun Jin; Hong Shan
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-07

3.  Prediction of the degree of pathological differentiation in tongue squamous cell carcinoma based on radiomics analysis of magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Baoting Yu; Chencui Huang; Jingxu Xu; Shuo Liu; Yuyao Guan; Tong Li; Xuewei Zheng; Jun Ding
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 4.  Precision Medicine Gains Momentum: Novel 3D Models and Stem Cell-Based Approaches in Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Annette Affolter; Anne Lammert; Johann Kern; Claudia Scherl; Nicole Rotter
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-07-08

5.  Meta-Analyses of Microarray Datasets Identifies ANO1 and FADD as Prognostic Markers of Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Ram Bhupal Reddy; Anupama Rajan Bhat; Bonney Lee James; Sindhu Valiyaveedan Govindan; Rohit Mathew; D R Ravindra; Naveen Hedne; Jeyaram Illiayaraja; Vikram Kekatpure; Samanta S Khora; Wesley Hicks; Pramila Tata; Moni A Kuriakose; Amritha Suresh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.