Literature DB >> 22297213

An audit of the cervical cancer screening histories of 246 women with carcinoma.

Máire A Duggan1, Jill Nation.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Women with cervical carcinoma and residing in the Calgary Health Region between 1996 and 2001 were audited to characterize factors in the opportunistic cervical cancer screening pathway contributing to screening failures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cohort consisted of 246 women. Information on their Pap tests and colposcopic/gynecologic examinations was obtained from the files of Calgary Laboratory Services and their colposcopic/cancer center treatment charts. Screening failure factors were defined, and frequencies were calculated.
RESULTS: Screening failure factors were as follows: (1) 41 (16.7%) were not screened, that is, no Pap test screening; (2) 29 (11.8%) were underscreened, that is, no Pap test within 12 months of diagnosis; (3) 28 (13.7%) were undersampled, that is, the Pap test result was negative; (4) 34 (13.8%) had no referral for a colposcopy/gynecology examination, and/or it was delayed for more than 3 months; (5) 18 (13.2%) had delayed referral for examination of an atypical glandular cell-high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and higher Pap test for more than 3 months; and (6) 73 (55.3%) were underdiagnosed, that is, the diagnosis in colposcopy examination was less than malignant. Underreported Pap tests and delayed Pap test reporting could not be fully investigated, but limited evidence suggested that underreporting contributed to some failures.
CONCLUSIONS: Factors other than recruitment to cytological screening need targeted improvement if the region's cervical cancer prevention program is to be more effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22297213     DOI: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e31823da811

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis        ISSN: 1089-2591            Impact factor:   1.925


  6 in total

1.  Flexible magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging for the diagnosis of uterine cervical tumors: A cooperative study among gastrointestinal endoscopists and gynecologists to explore a novel microvascular classification system.

Authors:  Noriko Nishiyama; Kenji Kanenishi; Hirohito Mori; Hideki Kobara; Shintaro Fujihara; Taiga Chiyo; Nobuya Kobayashi; Tae Matsunaga; Maki Ayaki; Tatsuo Yachida; Ayako Fujimori; Makoto Oryu; Chiaki Tenkumo; Megumi Ishibashi; Uiko Hanaoka; Toshiyuki Hata; Yumi Miyai; Kyuichi Kadota; Reiji Haba; Tsutomu Masaki
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  Characteristic findings of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or more on magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging.

Authors:  Kunihisa Uchita; Kenji Kanenishi; Koki Hirano; Hideki Kobara; Noriko Nishiyama; Ai Kawada; Shintaro Fujihara; Emi Ibuki; Reiji Haba; Yohei Takahashi; Yuka Kai; Kenji Yorita; Hirohito Mori; Jun Kunikata; Naoki Nishimoto; Toshiyuki Hata; Tsutomu Masaki
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Ontario Cervical Screening Program, colposcopy and treatment services in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study.

Authors:  O Meggetto; N Jembere; J Gao; M J Walker; M Rey; L Rabeneck; K J Murphy; R Kupets
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 7.331

4.  Automated recommendation for cervical cancer screening and surveillance.

Authors:  Kavishwar B Wagholikar; Kathy L MacLaughlin; Petra M Casey; Thomas M Kastner; Michael R Henry; Ronald A Hankey; Steve G Peters; Robert A Greenes; Christopher G Chute; Hongfang Liu; Rajeev Chaudhry
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2014-10-15

5.  Improving the Accuracy of a Clinical Decision Support System for Cervical Cancer Screening and Surveillance.

Authors:  K E Ravikumar; Kathy L MacLaughlin; Marianne R Scheitel; Maya Kessler; Kavishwar B Wagholikar; Hongfang Liu; Rajeev Chaudhry
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 2.342

6.  Impact of Patient Reminders on Papanicolaou Test Completion for High-Risk Patients Identified by a Clinical Decision Support System.

Authors:  Kathy L MacLaughlin; Maya E Kessler; Ravikumar Komandur Elayavilli; Branden C Hickey; Marianne R Scheitel; Kavishwar B Wagholikar; Hongfang Liu; Walter K Kremers; Rajeev Chaudhry
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 2.681

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.