Literature DB >> 22296901

[Wide support for oocyte donation and banking in the Netherlands].

Annelies M E Bos1, Petra Klapwijk, Bart C J M Fauser.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the general consensus on the cryopreservation of oocytes and the introduction of oocyte banking facilities in the Netherlands.
DESIGN: Poll investigation
METHOD: A poll with the use of an online questionnaire was conducted among nearly 19,000 participants of the Dutch EenVandaag opinion panel in May 2011. The poll results were adjusted to the Dutch population based on data from the Dutch Central Office for Statistics for age, gender, education, marital status, geographical area and political preference (measured according to the lower house elections of 2010). The primary endpoints were the percentages of supporters of oocyte freezing for own future use and of the concept of introducing oocyte banking facilities in The Netherlands. The secondary endpoints were the demographic differences between supporters and opponents.
RESULTS: Approximately half of 18.911 participants supported oocyte freezing (47%). Fifty-percent of all participants supported oocyte banking in the Netherlands. Supporters of oocyte freezing were mainly women ≤ 45 years of age, who are highly educated and have no children. Four percent of the participating women aged ≤ 45 years would seriously consider obtaining donor oocytes from an available oocyte banking facility. Twelve percent of the participating women ≤ 45 years of age said they would definitely donate their oocytes or would seriously consider donating. Thirty-seven percent of all participants were against the introduction of oocyte banking facilities. The most important arguments against oocyte freezing were that women should reproduce during normal reproductive years and that it was not medically necessary.
CONCLUSION: Poll results showed much support for oocyte freezing and for the introduction of oocyte banking facilities in the Netherlands. In addition, the poll shows that oocyte banking facilities would fulfil a need in the population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22296901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd        ISSN: 0028-2162


  2 in total

1.  Between "Medical" and "Social" Egg Freezing : A Comparative Analysis of Regulatory Frameworks in Austria, Germany, Israel, and the Netherlands.

Authors:  Nitzan Rimon-Zarfaty; Johanna Kostenzer; Lisa-Katharina Sismuth; Antoinette de Bont
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 2.216

2.  Stakeholders views on the ethical aspects of oocyte banking for third-party assisted reproduction: a qualitative interview study with donors, recipients and professionals.

Authors:  E M Kool; R van der Graaf; A M E Bos; J J P M Pieters; I M Custers; B C J M Fauser; A L Bredenoord
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 6.353

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.