Literature DB >> 22296877

Estimating dose to implantable cardioverter-defibrillator outside the treatment fields using a skin QED diode, optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters, and LiF thermoluminescent dosimeters.

Maria F Chan1, Yulin Song, Lawrence T Dauer, Jingdong Li, David Huang, Chandra Burman.   

Abstract

The purpose of this work was to determine the relative sensitivity of skin QED diodes, optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters (OSLDs) (microStar™ DOT, Landauer), and LiF thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) as a function of distance from a photon beam field edge when applied to measure dose at out-of-field points. These detectors have been used to estimate radiation dose to patients' implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) located outside the treatment field. The ICDs have a thin outer case made of 0.4- to 0.6-mm-thick titanium (∼2.4-mm tissue equivalent). A 5-mm bolus, being the equivalent depth of the devices under the patient's skin, was placed over the ICDs. Response per unit absorbed dose-to-water was measured for each of the dosimeters with and without bolus on the beam central axis (CAX) and at a distance up to 20 cm from the CAX. Doses were measured with an ionization chamber at various depths for 6- and 15-MV x-rays on a Varian Clinac-iX linear accelerator. Relative sensitivity of the detectors was determined as the ratio of the sensitivity at each off-axis distance to that at the CAX. The detector sensitivity as a function of the distance from the field edge changed by ± 3% (1-11%) for LiF TLD-700, decreased by 10% (5-21%) for OSLD, and increased by 16% (11-19%) for the skin QED diode (Sun Nuclear Corp.) at the equivalent depth of 5 mm for 6- or 15-MV photon energies. Our results showed that the use of bolus with proper thickness (i.e., ∼d(max) of the photon energy) on the top of the ICD would reduce the scattered dose to a lower level. Dosimeters should be calibrated out-of-field and preferably with bolus equal in thickness to the depth of interest. This can be readily performed in clinic.
Copyright © 2012 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22296877     DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2011.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Dosim        ISSN: 1873-4022            Impact factor:   1.531


  4 in total

Review 1.  A Review and Analysis of Managing Commonly Seen Implanted Devices for Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Maria F Chan; Claire Young; Daphna Gelblum; Chengyu Shi; Carolanne Rincon; Elizabeth Hipp; Jingdong Li; Dongxu Wang
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-08-06

2.  Re: Estimating and reducing dose received by cardiac devices for patients undergoing radiotherapy.

Authors:  Dimitris N Mihailidis
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Dosimetric review of cardiac implantable electronic device patients receiving radiotherapy.

Authors:  Joann I Prisciandaro; Akash Makkar; Colleen J Fox; James A Hayman; Laura Horwood; Frank Pelosi; Jean M Moran
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Management of a Radiation Therapy Patient With a Leadless Pacemaker.

Authors:  Dongxu Wang; Maria F Chan; Joseph Zambri; Phillip Lichtenwalner; James Oliver; Daphna Gelblum; Dhwani Parikh
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-05-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.