OBJECTIVE: Investigating the impact of Angelman syndrome on the sibling relationship. METHODS: This study explored differences in sibling relationships between children with a typically-developing sibling (n = 55) and children with a sibling with Angelman syndrome (n = 44). Sibling relationships were compared on four factors and 16 sub-scales of the Sibling Relationship Questionnaire-Revised. RESULTS: Results showed significant differences in mean scores on each of the four factors (i.e. Warmth/Closeness, Conflict, Rivalry and Dominance/Nurturance) and most of the sub-scales. ANCOVAs showed that demographic variables (number of siblings, living in a two-parent vs single parent household, gender, participant's age, place of residence) did not influence significant differences in sibling relationships between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Having a brother or sister with Angelman syndrome may influence the way in which the sibling perceives the sibling relationship. This may have important implications for family-centred intervention for this population.
OBJECTIVE: Investigating the impact of Angelman syndrome on the sibling relationship. METHODS: This study explored differences in sibling relationships between children with a typically-developing sibling (n = 55) and children with a sibling with Angelman syndrome (n = 44). Sibling relationships were compared on four factors and 16 sub-scales of the Sibling Relationship Questionnaire-Revised. RESULTS: Results showed significant differences in mean scores on each of the four factors (i.e. Warmth/Closeness, Conflict, Rivalry and Dominance/Nurturance) and most of the sub-scales. ANCOVAs showed that demographic variables (number of siblings, living in a two-parent vs single parent household, gender, participant's age, place of residence) did not influence significant differences in sibling relationships between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Having a brother or sister with Angelman syndrome may influence the way in which the sibling perceives the sibling relationship. This may have important implications for family-centred intervention for this population.
Authors: Jessica Duis; Mark Nespeca; Jane Summers; Lynne Bird; Karen G C B Bindels-de Heus; M J Valstar; Marie-Claire Y de Wit; C Navis; Maartje Ten Hooven-Radstaake; Bianca M van Iperen-Kolk; Susan Ernst; Melina Dendrinos; Terry Katz; Gloria Diaz-Medina; Akshat Katyayan; Srishti Nangia; Ronald Thibert; Daniel Glaze; Christopher Keary; Karine Pelc; Nicole Simon; Anjali Sadhwani; Helen Heussler; Anne Wheeler; Caroline Woeber; Margaret DeRamus; Amy Thomas; Emily Kertcher; Lauren DeValk; Kristen Kalemeris; Kara Arps; Carol Baym; Nicole Harris; John P Gorham; Brenda L Bohnsack; Reid C Chambers; Sarah Harris; Henry G Chambers; Katherine Okoniewski; Elizabeth R Jalazo; Allyson Berent; Carlos A Bacino; Charles Williams; Anne Anderson Journal: Mol Genet Genomic Med Date: 2022-02-11 Impact factor: 2.183