Literature DB >> 22295129

Factors influencing progression-free survival in gastrointestinal stromal tumors with special reference to pathologic features, cytogenetics, and radiologic response.

Suresh V Attili, Bb Ananda, T Mandapal, V Anjaneyulu, Sudha Sinha, Obula C Reddy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) changed significantly with the advent of targeted therapy with imatinib. Clear markers predictive of response to imatinib therapy and disease-free survival in patients with GIST have not been identified. Even RECIST criteria are inadequate for predicting response to therapy, especially in patients with stable disease. Data collected at a tertiary care cancer center from 2003 to 2005 in south India were analyzed retrospectively to assess clinical, pathologic, and cytogenetic profiles of patients with GIST. In addition, radiologic responses to therapy were evaluated for correlation with the disease-free survival.
METHODS: GIST was defined as a mesenchymal spindle/epitheloid cell lesion arising in the GI tract with CD117 positivity. Only data from patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease were analyzed. Clinical and pathologic details of the patients were noted from case records. NCCN guidelines were followed for the treatment. Radiologic response to therapy was reassessed according to RECIST, and progression-free survival calculated for all analyzed patients using intent-to-treat analysis.
RESULTS: The mean age of presentation was 42.8 ± 5.3 years (24-60), with a male-to-female ratio of 1.5:1. Small intestine was the most common disease site (60%), followed by stomach (20%), mesentery (7.2%), colorectal regions (7.2%), and other sites (5.6%). The most frequent pathologic finding in patients having recurrence was high mitotic rate. Initial tumor size (either in the metastatic setting or in local recurrence) had no bearing on progression-free or overall survival, nor did initial anatomic location or site of metastasis. Histologically, however, patients with a mixed-cell morphology had shorter survival compared to the other morphologies. Those patients having any cytogenetic abnormality had worse outcome compared to those with normal karyotype. Similarly, among patients who achieved remission, those who did so within 12 weeks had better overall survival than did those with a delayed time to remission. Overall survival of patients having stable disease and late partial responses (after 3 months) was similar and superior to survival for patients whose disease progressed while on therapy.
CONCLUSION: GISTs characterized by a high mitotic rate and mixed-cell morphology and any cytogenetic abnormalities are associated with poorer outcome. Similarly, shorter time to response was more important than the actual response to therapy. Initial disease site, the site of metastasis, and tumor size had no bearing on outcomes to therapy.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22295129      PMCID: PMC3269139     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res        ISSN: 1934-7820


  10 in total

1.  Two hundred gastrointestinal stromal tumors: recurrence patterns and prognostic factors for survival.

Authors:  R P DeMatteo; J J Lewis; D Leung; S S Mudan; J M Woodruff; M F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumors--definition, clinical, histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic features and differential diagnosis.

Authors:  M Miettinen; J Lasota
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 3.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: review on morphology, molecular pathology, prognosis, and differential diagnosis.

Authors:  Markku Miettinen; Jerzy Lasota
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.534

4.  Prognosis of gastrointestinal smooth-muscle (stromal) tumors: dependence on anatomic site.

Authors:  T S Emory; L H Sobin; L Lukes; D H Lee; T J O'Leary
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.394

5.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

Authors:  E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 6.  Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A consensus approach.

Authors:  Christopher D M Fletcher; Jules J Berman; Christopher Corless; Fred Gorstein; Jerzy Lasota; B Jack Longley; Markku Miettinen; Timothy J O'Leary; Helen Remotti; Brian P Rubin; Barry Shmookler; Leslie H Sobin; Sharon W Weiss
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 7.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: rationale for surgical adjuvant trials with imatinib.

Authors:  Janice N Cormier; Shreyaskumar R Patel; Peter W T Pisters
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 8.  Mutation analysis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: increasing significance for risk assessment and effective targeted therapy.

Authors:  Eva Wardelmann; Reinhard Büttner; Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse; Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 4.064

9.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a single institution experience of 50 cases.

Authors:  Senthil Rajappa; Krishna Mohan Muppavarapu; Shantveer Uppin; Raghunadharao Digumarti
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct

10.  Efficacy and safety of imatinib mesylate in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  George D Demetri; Margaret von Mehren; Charles D Blanke; Annick D Van den Abbeele; Burton Eisenberg; Peter J Roberts; Michael C Heinrich; David A Tuveson; Samuel Singer; Milos Janicek; Jonathan A Fletcher; Stuart G Silverman; Sandra L Silberman; Renaud Capdeville; Beate Kiese; Bin Peng; Sasa Dimitrijevic; Brian J Druker; Christopher Corless; Christopher D M Fletcher; Heikki Joensuu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Overexpression of carbonic anhydrase II and Ki-67 proteins in prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Li-Cheng Liu; Wen-Tong Xu; Xin Wu; Po Zhao; Ya-Li Lv; Lin Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  CD133 and Ki-67 expression is associated with gastrointestinal stromal tumor prognosis.

Authors:  Canrong Lu; Licheng Liu; Xin Wu; Wentong Xu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 3.  Ki67 is a biological marker of malignant risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu Zhou; Wenqing Hu; Ping Chen; Masanobu Abe; Lei Shi; Si-Yuan Tan; Yong Li; Liang Zong
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Relationship between efficacy of sunitinib and KIT mutation of patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors after failure of imatinib: A systematic review.

Authors:  Fuming Xie; Weidong Xiao; Yahui Jiang; Xiao Xia; Yaxu Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.