| Literature DB >> 22295037 |
Zbigniew Jabłonowski1, Edyta Reszka, Jolanta Gromadzińska, Wojciech Wąsowicz, Marek Sosnowski.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to examine the frequency of methylation status in promoter regions of p16 and DAPK genes in patients with non-invasive bladder cancer.Entities:
Keywords: DAPK; hypermethylation; methylation-specific PCR; non-invasive bladder cancer; p16
Year: 2011 PMID: 22295037 PMCID: PMC3258754 DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2011.23421
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Med Sci ISSN: 1734-1922 Impact factor: 3.318
Characteristics of studied groups
| Bladder cancer [pts] | Control group | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 42 | 42 | ||
| 39 (92.9%) | 33 (91.7%) | ||
| 3 (7.1%) | 3 (8.3%) | ||
| 66.5 ±10.4 | 57.0 ±17.2 | ||
| 25.7 ±4.0 | 25.7 ±4.0 | ||
| 31 (73.8%) | 25 (69.4%) | ||
| 11 (26.2%) | 11 (30.6%) | ||
| 42 (100%) | – | ||
| 30 (71.4%) | – | ||
| 8 (19.1%) | – | ||
| 4 (9.5%) | – |
Student’s t-test and Mann-Whitney U test, NS – not significant
χ2 test, NS – not significant
Primer sequence, product size and annealing temperature used for MSP
| Gene | Forward primer (F) (5’ → 3’) | Reverse primer (R) (5’ → 3’) | Annealing temperature [°C] | Product size [bp] | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N1F GAAGAAAGAGGAGGGGTTGG | NR CTACAAACCCTCTAC | 60 | 280 | Palmisano | |
| M2F TTATTAGAGGGTGGGGCGGATCGC | MR GACCCCGAACCGCGACCGTAA | 65 | 150 | Herman | |
| U3F TTATTAGAGGGTGGGGTGGATTGT | UR CAACCCCAAACCACAACCATAA | 60 | 151 | ||
| MF GGATAGTCGGATCGAGTTAACGTC | MR CCCTCCCAAACGCCGA | 56 | 98 | Esteller | |
| UF GGAGGATAGTTGGATTGAGTTAATGTT | UR CAAATCCCTCCCAAACACCAA | 61 | 106 | ||
N – nested PCR primer, M – methylated-specific primer, U – unmethylated-specific primer
Percentage of DAPK and p16 gene methylation
| Gene methylation | No. of pts | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| DAPK methylation | 27/42 | 64.3 |
| p16 methylation | 17/42 | 40.5 |
| DAPK and p16 methylation | 12/42 | 28.6 |
| No methylation | 10/42 | 23.8 |
Higher frequency (p = 0.046) of DAPK methylation (71.4%) in patients with lower grading (G1) in comparison to G2 and G3 (55%). No such dependency in methylation of p16. No methylation of p16 and DAPK in healthy control volunteers. p16 and DAPK methylation; smokers vs. non-smokers – no significance