Literature DB >> 22295036

Accuracy of sonographic criteria in the decision for surgical treatment in infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.

Jerzy Niedzielski1, Artur Kobielski, Jan Sokal, Marek Krakós.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Abdominal ultrasonography has replaced barium studies in establishing the diagnosis in difficult cases of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS). The aim of this retrospective study was to establish sonographic criteria of qualification for surgical treatment in children with IHPS.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Hundred and fifteen infants (98 boys and 17 girls) with suspected IHPS were treated between 2000 and 2009. Pyloric muscle thickness, pyloric diameter and pyloric length were measured in US scans in all patients. Results were compared with US results of 19 infants with negative diagnosis and 29 children of the reference group.
RESULTS: Diagnosis of IHPS was confirmed by US examination in 96 children (83.5%). There were 86 boys in the group with male prevalence 8.6 : 1. The remaining 19 infants (16.5%) had a negative ultrasound. The mean PL (20.89 vs. 12.73), PMT (5.41 vs. 2.24), and PD (14.1 vs. 7.42) differed significantly between patients with and without pyloric stenosis (p < 0.0001). The mean PL (12.34), PMT (2.2), and PD (7.48) in the reference group did not differ statistically from values obtained in patients with negative IHPS diagnosis and were significantly lower than in children from the IHPS group (p < 0.0001). US imaging had a sensitivity of 98%, specificity of 100%, with a positive and negative predictive value of 100% and 90% respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that ultrasonography is the first choice of diagnostic method in an infant with suspected hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. In cases with an uncertain clinical diagnosis of IHPS the examination can be easily repeated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis; pyloric diameter; pyloric length; pyloric muscle thickness; ultrasonography

Year:  2011        PMID: 22295036      PMCID: PMC3258744          DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2011.23419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Med Sci        ISSN: 1734-1922            Impact factor:   3.318


Introduction

Overall incidence of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS) in Europe assessed by EUROCAT (registries of congenital malformations) was 2.0 per 1000 live births (LB), ranging from 0.86 to 3.96 per 1000 LB [1]. The rate of IHPS in the USA ranges from 1.7 to 2.4 per 1000 LB [2, 3] and in the UK from 1.4 to 4.4 per 1000 LB [4, 5]. Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis occurs predominantly in boys compared with girls (4.2 : 1), and in Whites compared with Blacks (2.8 : 1) and compared with Asians (5 : 1) [3, 6]. The exact cause of IHPS is still poorly understood, although more than two hundred years have passed since it was first described [7]. Luckily pyloromyotomy, introduced by Ramstedt in 1912, is an operation that has proved to be curative and without any modification has been accepted worldwide as the procedure for IHPS for a 100 years now [8]. Non-bilious vomitus is the initial symptom of the disease. Diagnosis is established by palpating the olive-shaped, firm pyloric muscle mass and abdominal ultrasonography. Abdominal ultrasonography has replaced barium studies in establishing the diagnosis in difficult cases of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis and has become the diagnostic method of choice for IHPS over the last 20 years [9-11]. The aim of this retrospective study was to find sonographic criteria for the necessity of surgical treatment of IHPS and to assess the sensitivity of ultrasound imaging in the diagnosis of the disease.

Material and methods

The medical records of 115 infants with suspected IHPS treated in the University Children’s Hospital No. 4 in Lodz, Poland between 2000 and 2009 were reviewed retrospectively and analysed. There were 98 boys and 17 girls, at median age of 40 days (range: 13 to 111 days) in the group. All children had ultrasound imaging (US) with details of the pylorus. Measurements of the pyloric muscle thickness (PMT), pyloric diameter (PD) and pyloric length (PL) were taken from a longitudinal scan of the pylorus. Results obtained in the IHPS group were compared with US data obtained in infants with negative diagnosis and with measurements in the reference group. The reference group consisted of 29 infants (19 boys and 10 girls), at median age of 56 days (range: 15 to 107 days) hospitalized for other diseases such as pneumonia, urological problems or abdominal hernias, with no clinical manifestation of pyloric stenosis (vomiting). The accuracy of the US procedure was related to the finally established diagnosis. Statistical analysis was performed with Student’s t-test.

Results

Diagnosis of IHPS was confirmed by US examination in 96 out of 115 children (83.5%). There were 86 boys and 10 girls, aged 13 to 111 days in the IHPS group, with male prevalence 8.6 : 1. The remaining 19 of 115 infants (16.5%) had a negative ultrasound and were disqualified from surgery (Table I). Conservative treatment led to resolution of vomiting in these children, which proved that the sonographic result was in agreement with the clinical outcome.
Table I

Clinical manifestations in the studied groups of infants

Groups of patients No. of patients (%)MFM/F rateAge [days], median (range)
Infants with vomiting11594214.5 : 140 (13-111)
– Qualified for operation96 (83.5%)86108.6 : 140 (13-111)
– Treated conservatively19 (16.5%)8111 : 1.342 (19-99)
Controls2919101.9 : 153.8 (15-107)

M – male, F – female

The mean pyloric muscle thickness (PMT 5.41 vs. 2.24), pyloric diameter (PD 14.1 vs. 7.42), and pyloric length (PL 20.89 vs. 12.73) differed significantly between patients with and without pyloric stenosis (p < 0.0001) (Table II). The PMT value was never lower than 3 mm in infants with IHPS, and was never higher than 2.5 mm in children with negative diagnosis. The pyloric length was never higher than 15 mm in infants without IHPS and was never below 16 mm in children with a positive diagnosis.
Table II

Sonographic data

US parameters [mm[] Mean value (SD) PatientsStatistical relation (t-test)
US positiveUS negativeControls
Pyloric muscle thickness5.41 ±0.912.24 ±0.282.2 ±0.271-2: t = 14.9, p < 0.0001
1-3: t = 18.7, p < 0.0001
2-3: t = 0.5, NS
Pyloric diameter14.1 ±1.477.42 ±0.457.48 ±0.541-2: t = 19.5, p < 0.0001
1-3: t = 23.7, p < 0.0001
2-3: t = –0.4, NS
Pyloric length20.89 ±3.3312.73 ±2.0212.34 ±1.991-2: t = 10.2, p < 0.0001
1-3: t = 13.0, p < 0.0001
2-3: t = 0.6, NS

SD – standard deviation, NS – not significant

The mean PL (12.34), PMT (2.2), and PD (7.48) in the reference group did not differ significantly from values obtained in patients with a negative IHPS diagnosis and were significantly lower than in children from the IHPS group (p < 0.0001) (Table II, Figures 1 and 2).
Figure 1

Ultrasonographic image of the normal pylorus in a 3-week-old female. A – indicates pyloric length (12 mm), B – pyloric diameter (7 mm)

Figure 2

Ultrasonographic scan of the hypertrophic pylorus in a 5-week-old male. 1 – indicates pyloric length (22.5 mm), 2 – pyloric diameter (14 mm), 3 – pyloric muscle thickness (6 mm)

Ultrasound imaging had a sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 100%, with a positive and negative predictive value of 100% and 90% respectively (Table III). The two diagnostic false negative errors occurred at the beginning of the analysed period (the 'learning curve' of the sonographers) and never occurred later. There were no false positive US scans in this study. US scans were repeated in six children to confirm the diagnosis (6/115 – 5%).
Table III

Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography (US) in the group of infants with hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS)

US diagnosis of IHPS IHPSPredictive value
(+)(-)
US(+)True positive – 94False positive – 0Positive – 100%
(-)False negative – 2True negative – 19Negative – 90%
Sensitivity – 98%Specificity – 100%×

Discussion

Wide access to ultrasonography in the late 1980s began a new era in diagnostics of IHPS. Before diagnosis was based mainly on clinical criteria, such as palpation of the hard muscle mass of the pylorus and barium meal studies for problematic and equivocal cases. Ultrasound created new possibilities. The examination is easy to perform, is non-invasive and is simple and reliable if performed by an experienced paediatric sonographer. With increasing accuracy of sonography the usefulness and reliability of clinical examination declined to less than 50% in the early 1990s and is probably even lower nowadays [12]. We noticed that the pyloric muscle was never thicker than 2.5 mm in patients without IHPS both in the examined and in the reference group. A pyloric muscle thickness greater than 3 mm was found in all cases of IHPS. Our findings were similar to those reported in the literature [10, 13, 14]. In infants with clinical symptoms of IHPS and borderline muscle thickness of 3 mm US examination should be repeated a few days later. Persistent vomiting usually causes dehydration of the infant with pyloric stenosis resulting in low measurements on sonographic scans. Starinsky et al. reported that the muscle thickness measurements increased in almost 50% of patients with IHPS after effective fluid resuscitation [15]. In our series, US examination was repeated after 3-4 days of observation in 6 infants with borderline measurements and persistent non-bilious vomiting after most feeding during a day. Pyloric stenosis was confirmed in all 6 precarious cases. We found that the pyloric length was never below 17 mm in children with IHPS and was never greater than 15 mm in infants with a negative diagnosis. In children with borderline pyloric length of 15-16 mm this parameter should, in the authors’ opinion, be considered only together with pyloric muscle thickness. Some of the infants with IHPS are premature. However, no correlation has been reported in the literature between infant body weight and length and PMT measured in ultrasound [11, 12]. Haider et al. found that pyloric length in infants with IHPS was significantly greater in those born at term compared to those born prematurely and that PL was strongly correlated with the weight of the infant [11]. Godbole et al. did not confirm these findings [16]. An important sonographic sign is visualization of the passing of the gastric contents through the relaxing pyloric canal. If the sonographer notices this sign, a positive diagnosis of IHPS can be definitely excluded. Ultrasound imaging as reported in the literature had sensitivity ranging from 76 to 100% and specificity from 85 to 100% [10, 13-15]. The results obtained in our series revealed a sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 100% of this diagnostic tool. In conclusion, this study confirmed that ultrasound examination is the first choice of diagnostic method in an infant with suspected hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. In cases with an uncertain clinical diagnosis of IHPS the examination can be easily repeated and unnecessary surgery can thereby be prevented. The US criteria for a positive diagnosis of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis established with our study are pyloric muscle thickness (PMT) of 3 mm and above and pyloric muscle length (PML) of 17 mm and above.
  15 in total

1.  Congenital hypertrophic stenosis of the pylorus.

Authors:  H BEARDSLEY
Journal:  Arch Pediatr       Date:  1958-09

2.  Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a comparative study of incidence and other epidemiological characteristics in seven European regions.

Authors:  Rikke Neess Pedersen; Ester Garne; Maria Loane; Lars Korsholm; Steffen Husby
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2008-09

3.  [Sonography of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis--attempt at prognostic evaluation based on sonographic criteria].

Authors:  M Riccabona
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1990-01-05       Impact factor: 1.704

4.  The epidemiology of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.

Authors:  R Schechter; C P Torfs; T F Bateson
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.980

5.  Ultrasound compared with clinical examination in infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.

Authors:  P Godbole; A Sprigg; J A Dickson; P C Lin
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Does dehydration affect thickness of the pyloric muscle? An experimental study.

Authors:  Ruth Starinsky; Baruch Klin; Yariv Siman-Tov; Joseph Barr
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  The epidemiology of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in Greater Glasgow area, 1980-96.

Authors:  S T Sule; D H Stone; H Gilmour
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.980

8.  Sonographic diagnosis of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Getachew Assefa
Journal:  Ethiop Med J       Date:  2002-04

9.  Prevalence of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in Texas, 1999-2002.

Authors:  Jing Wang; D Kim Waller; Lu-Yu Hwang; Lockwood G Taylor; Mark A Canfield
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2008-11

10.  The ultrasonic diagnosis of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: technique and accuracy.

Authors:  D Neilson; A S Hollman
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.350

View more
  6 in total

1.  Safety and benefit of ad libitum feeding following laparoscopic pyloromyotomy: retrospective comparative trial.

Authors:  Yeahwa Hong; Frances Okolo; Katrina Morgan; Nicholas Hess; Marissa Narr; Athena Pyros; Victoria Humphrey; Marcus Malek
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Ultrasound diagnosis of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis - Time to change the criteria.

Authors:  Lino Piotto; Roger Gent; Ajay Taranath; Giovanni Bibbo; Day Way Goh
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2022-06-10

3.  A crying baby: not simply infant colic.

Authors:  Roberta Onesimo; Valentina Giorgio; Serena Monaco; Carlo Fundarò
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2012-08-21

4.  Application of color Doppler ultrasound combined with Doppler imaging artifacts in the diagnosis and estimate of congenital hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.

Authors:  Suihong Ma; Jianhua Liu; Youxiang Zhang; Yuwen Yang; Hai Jin; Xiaomei Ma; Hongqin Wei
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Emergency ultrasonography of the gastrointestinal tract of children.

Authors:  Jae-Yeon Hwang
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2017-01-25

6.  Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis at a tertiary care hospital in Tanzania: a surgical experience with 102 patients over a 5-year period.

Authors:  Phillipo L Chalya; Mange Manyama; Neema M Kayange; Joseph B Mabula; Alicia Massenga
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-11-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.