Literature DB >> 22294809

An adaptive-duration version of the PVT accurately tracks changes in psychomotor vigilance induced by sleep restriction.

Mathias Basner1, David F Dinges.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: The Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT) is a widely used assay of behavioral alertness sensitive to the effects of sleep loss and circadian misalignment. The standard 10-minute duration of the PVT is often considered impractical for operational or clinical environments. Therefore, we developed and validated an adaptive-duration version of the PVT (PVT-A) that stops sampling once it has gathered enough information to correctly classify PVT performance.
DESIGN: Repeated-measures experiments involving 10-minute PVT assessments every 2 hours across both acute total sleep deprivation (TSD) and 5 days of chronic partial sleep deprivation (PSD).
SETTING: Controlled laboratory environment. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-four healthy subjects (34 women), aged 22 to 45 years.
INTERVENTIONS: A TSD experiment involving 33 hours awake (n = 31 subjects), and a PSD experiment involving 5 nights of 4 hours time in bed (n = 43 subjects). MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: The PVT-A algorithm was trained with 527 TSD test bouts and validated with 880 PSD test bouts. Based on our primary outcome measure "number of lapses (response times ≥ 500 ms) plus false starts (premature responses or response times < 100 ms)," 10-minute PVT performance was classified into high (≤ 5 lapses and false starts), medium (> 5 and ≤ 16 lapses and false starts), or low (> 16 lapses and false starts). The decision threshold for PVT-A termination was set so that at least 95% of training data-set tests were classified correctly and no test was classified incorrectly across 2 performance categories (i.e., high as low or low as high), resulting in an average test duration of 6.0 minutes (SD 2.4 min). In the validation data set, 95.7% of test bouts were correctly classified, and there were no incorrect classifications across 2 categories. Agreement corrected for chance was excellent (κ = 0.92). Across the 3 performance categories, sensitivity averaged 93.7% (range 87.2%-100%), and specificity averaged 96.8% (range 91.6%-99.9%). Test duration averaged 6.4 minutes (SD 1.7 min), with a minimum of 27 seconds.
CONCLUSIONS: We developed and validated a highly accurate, sensitive, and specific adaptive-duration version of the 10-minute PVT. Test duration of the adaptive PVT averaged less than 6.5 minutes, with 60 tests (4.3%) terminating after less than 2 minutes, increasing the practicability of the test in operational and clinical settings. The adaptive-duration strategy may be superior to a simple reduction of PVT duration in which the fixed test duration may be too short to identify subjects with moderate impairment (showing deficits only later during the test) but unnecessarily long for those who are either fully alert or severely impaired.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PVT; alertness; attention; lapse; psychomotor vigilance; response speed; response time; sensitivity; sleep deprivation

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22294809      PMCID: PMC3250358          DOI: 10.5665/sleep.1620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sleep        ISSN: 0161-8105            Impact factor:   5.849


  35 in total

1.  Extended work shifts and the risk of motor vehicle crashes among interns.

Authors:  Laura K Barger; Brian E Cade; Najib T Ayas; John W Cronin; Bernard Rosner; Frank E Speizer; Charles A Czeisler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-01-13       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Can a shorter psychomotor vigilance task be used as a reasonable substitute for the ten-minute psychomotor vigilance task?

Authors:  Gregory D Roach; Drew Dawson; Nicole Lamond
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.877

3.  An ECG-based algorithm for the automatic identification of autonomic activations associated with cortical arousal.

Authors:  Mathias Basner; Barbara Griefahn; Uwe Müller; Gernot Plath; Alexander Samel
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.849

Review 4.  A systematic review of the neurobehavioural and physiological effects of shiftwork systems.

Authors:  Timothy R Driscoll; Ronald R Grunstein; Naomi L Rogers
Journal:  Sleep Med Rev       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 11.609

5.  Lapsing during sleep deprivation is associated with distributed changes in brain activation.

Authors:  Michael W L Chee; Jiat Chow Tan; Hui Zheng; Sarayu Parimal; Daniel H Weissman; Vitali Zagorodnov; David F Dinges
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Mismatch between subjective alertness and objective performance under sleep restriction is greatest during the biological night.

Authors:  Xuan Zhou; Sally A Ferguson; Raymond W Matthews; Charli Sargent; David Darwent; David J Kennaway; Gregory D Roach
Journal:  J Sleep Res       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 3.981

7.  A meta-analysis of the impact of short-term sleep deprivation on cognitive variables.

Authors:  Julian Lim; David F Dinges
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Maximizing sensitivity of the psychomotor vigilance test (PVT) to sleep loss.

Authors:  Mathias Basner; David F Dinges
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 5.849

9.  Imaging brain fatigue from sustained mental workload: an ASL perfusion study of the time-on-task effect.

Authors:  Julian Lim; Wen-Chau Wu; Jiongjiong Wang; John A Detre; David F Dinges; Hengyi Rao
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 10.  Sleep deprivation and vigilant attention.

Authors:  Julian Lim; David F Dinges
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.691

View more
  16 in total

1.  Preferential consolidation of emotionally salient information during a nap is preserved in middle age.

Authors:  Sara E Alger; Elizabeth A Kensinger; Jessica D Payne
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 4.673

2.  Sleepiness and Safety: Where Biology Needs Technology.

Authors:  Takashi Abe; Daniel Mollicone; Mathias Basner; David F Dinges
Journal:  Sleep Biol Rhythms       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 1.186

3.  Adverse Effects of Daylight Saving Time on Adolescents' Sleep and Vigilance.

Authors:  Diana Medina; Matthew Ebben; Sara Milrad; Brianna Atkinson; Ana C Krieger
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.062

4.  Do different salience cues compete for dominance in memory over a daytime nap?

Authors:  Sara E Alger; Shirley Chen; Jessica D Payne
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 2.877

5.  Sleep disturbance and neurobehavioral performance among postpartum women.

Authors:  Salvatore P Insana; Kayla B Williams; Hawley E Montgomery-Downs
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 5.849

6.  Infant sleep and feeding patterns are associated with maternal sleep, stress, and depressed mood in women with a history of major depressive disorder (MDD).

Authors:  Katherine M Sharkey; Ijeoma N Iko; Jason T Machan; Johanna Thompson-Westra; Teri B Pearlstein
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 3.633

7.  Effects of a single night of postpartum sleep on childless women's daytime functioning.

Authors:  Amanda L McBean; Steven G Kinsey; Hawley E Montgomery-Downs
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-01-15

8.  Development and Validation of the Cognition Test Battery for Spaceflight.

Authors:  Mathias Basner; Adam Savitt; Tyler M Moore; Allison M Port; Sarah McGuire; Adrian J Ecker; Jad Nasrini; Daniel J Mollicone; Christopher M Mott; Thom McCann; David F Dinges; Ruben C Gur
Journal:  Aerosp Med Hum Perform       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.053

9.  Addressing the need for validation of a touchscreen psychomotor vigilance task: important considerations for sleep health research.

Authors:  Michael A Grandner; Nathaniel F Watson; Matthew Kay; Demi Ocaño; Julie A Kientz
Journal:  Sleep Health       Date:  2018-08-29

10.  Sleepiness, long distance commuting and night work as predictors of driving performance.

Authors:  Lee Di Milia; Naomi L Rogers; Torbjörn Åkerstedt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.