Literature DB >> 22294560

Outcome after redo-mitral valve replacement in adult patients: a 10-year single-centre experience.

Hunaid A Vohra1, Robert N Whistance, Apostolos Roubelakis, Andrew Burton, Clifford W Barlow, Geoffrey M K Tsang, Steve A Livesey, Sunil K Ohri.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the overall outcome of adult patients undergoing redo-mitral valve replacement (redo-MVR) at our institution. Forty-nine patients (24 males) underwent redo-MVR with either bioprosthetic (n = 24) or mechanical valves (n = 25) between January 2000 and 2010. Median age of patients was 63 years (range 21-80 years), and the mean additive EuroSCORE was 12 ± 4. Median time to re-operation was 8.2 ± 6.6 years for first time redo-MVR and 6.4 ± 5.6 years for second-time redo-MVR. Indications included prosthetic endocarditis (n = 22), para-prosthetic leak (n = 12), structural valve degeneration (n = 8), prosthetic valve thrombosis (n = 6) and malignancy (n = 1). The mean follow-up was 47.5 ± 37.0 months (range 0.1-112.3 months). In-hospital mortality was 12% (n = 6). Mean hospital stay was 17 ± 11 days (range 8-50 days). Actuarial survival at 1 and 5 years was 81 ± 5% and 72 ± 6%, respectively. Three patients required re-intervention: two for prosthetic valve endocarditis and one for para-prosthetic leak. Multivariate analysis showed that overall survival was associated with the LVEF < 50% (P < 0.001), concomitant AVR (P < 0.001) and urgent surgery (P = 0.03).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22294560      PMCID: PMC3735849          DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivs005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  14 in total

1.  Surgical correction of aortic insufficiency.

Authors:  C A HUFNAGEL; W P HARVEY; P J RABIL; T F McDERMOTT
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1954-05       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Risk of reoperative valve replacement for failed mitral and aortic bioprostheses.

Authors:  C W Akins; M J Buckley; W M Daggett; A D Hilgenberg; G J Vlahakes; D F Torchiana; J C Madsen
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Repeat heart valve surgery: risk factors for operative mortality.

Authors:  J M Jones; H O'kane; D J Gladstone; M A Sarsam; G Campalani; S W MacGowan; J Cleland; G W Cran
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Long-term outcomes of percutaneous mitral balloon valvuloplasty versus open cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Jae-Kwan Song; Mi-Jeong Kim; Sung-Cheol Yun; Suk Jung Choo; Jong-Min Song; Hyun Song; Duk-Hyun Kang; Cheol Hyun Chung; Duk Woo Park; Seung Whan Lee; Young-Hak Kim; Cheol Whan Lee; Myeong-Ki Hong; Jae-Joong Kim; Jae Won Lee; Seong-Wook Park; Seung-Jung Park
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Re-replacement for prosthetic valve dysfunction: analysis of long-term results and risk factors.

Authors:  K Morishita; T Mawatari; T Baba; J Fukada; T Abe
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Reoperation in biological and mechanical valve populations: fate of the reoperative patient.

Authors:  G F Tyers; W R Jamieson; A I Munro; E Germann; L H Burr; R T Miyagishima; H Ling
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Redo mitral valve surgery-a long-term experience.

Authors:  Arkalgud Sampath Kumar; Jayesh Dhareshwar; Balram Airan; Anil Bhan; Rajesh Sharma; Panangipalli Venugopal
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.620

Review 8.  Risk of repeat mitral valve replacement for failed mitral valve prostheses.

Authors:  D Dean Potter; Thoralf M Sundt; Kenton J Zehr; Joseph A Dearani; Richard C Daly; Charles J Mullany; Christopher G A McGregor; Francisco J Puga; Hartzell V Schaff; Thomas A Orszulak
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Reoperation on prosthetic heart values. Patient-specific estimates of in-hospital events.

Authors:  J M Piehler; E H Blackstone; K R Bailey; M E Sullivan; J R Pluth; N S Weiss; R S Brookmeyer; J G Chandler
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Redo valvular surgery in elderly patients.

Authors:  Manjula Maganti; Vivek Rao; Susan Armstrong; Christopher M Feindel; Hugh E Scully; Tirone E David
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  21 in total

1.  eComment. Predictive factors for hospital mortality in redo mitral valve patients.

Authors:  Rui M S Almeida
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-05

Review 2.  Current Status of Catheter-Based Treatment of Mitral Valve Regurgitation.

Authors:  Mario Gössl; Robert S Farivar; Richard Bae; Paul Sorajja
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Access options for transcatheter mitral valve implantation in patients with prior surgical bioprosthesis.

Authors:  Laura Besola; Anson Cheung; Jian Ye; Myriam Akodad; Andrew Chatfield; Gnalini Sathananthan; Robert Moss; John Webb
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-09

4.  Transapical transcatheter mitral valve implantation in patients with degenerated mitral bioprostheses or failed ring annuloplasty.

Authors:  Alina Zubarevich; Marcin Szczechowicz; Konstantin Zhigalov; Philipp Marx; Alexander Lind; Rolf Alexander Jánosi; Tienush Rassaf; Sharaf-Eldin Shehada; Rizwan Malik; Markus Kamler; Matthias Thielmann; Bastian Schmack; Arjang Ruhparwar; Alexander Weymann; Daniel Wendt
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-09

5.  Contemporary treatment of mitral valve disease with transcatheter mitral valve implantation.

Authors:  Matti Adam; Elmar Kuhn; Hendrik Wienemann; Victor Mauri; Laurin Ochs; Maria Isabel Körber; Kaveh Eghbalzadeh; Christos Iliadis; Marcel Halbach; Thorsten Wahlers; Stephan Baldus
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 6.138

6.  Replacement of a Björk-Shiley tilting disc mitral valve prosthesis 33 years after initial replacement.

Authors:  Yugal Kishore Mishra; Naresh Kumar Aggarwal; Sanjay Sharma; Sanket Garg
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2022-01-07

7.  Real-time intraoperative co-registration of transesophageal echocardiography with fluoroscopy facilitates transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation in cases of invisible degenerated bioprosthetic valves.

Authors:  Isaac Wamala; Axel Unbehaun; Christoph Klein; Marian Kukucka; Dirk Eggert-Doktor; Semih Buz; Julia Stein; Simon Sündermann; Volkmar Falk; Jörg Kempfert
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-05-10

8.  Reoperative Mitral Surgery Versus Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Aditya Sengupta; Farhang Yazdchi; Sophia L Alexis; Edward Percy; Akash Premkumar; Sameer Hirji; Vinayak N Bapat; Deepak L Bhatt; Tsuyoshi Kaneko; Gilbert H L Tang
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Failed transcatheter mitral valve-in-ring implantation followed by transapical valve-in-valve within the ring and ad hoc paravalvular leak closure.

Authors:  Beytullah Çakal; Sinem Çakal; Hacı Murat Güneş; Mehmet Onur Omaygenç; Aydın Yıldırım
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.475

10.  Clinical Effect of Left Ventricular Dysfunction in Patients with Mitral Stenosis after Mitral Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Kwon Jae Park; Jong Soo Woo; Jong Yoon Park; Jae Hwa Jung
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-10-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.