BACKGROUND: Striatal dopamine transporter abnormalities are thought to underlie the pathophysiology and psychostimulant treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, individual studies using single photon emission tomography (SPECT) or positron emission tomography (PET) have yielded inconsistent results, i.e., both high and low striatal dopamine transporter levels. METHOD: Nine SPECT and PET studies investigating striatal dopamine transporter density in ADHD patients (N=169) and age-, gender-, and IQ-matched healthy comparison subjects (N=173) were included in a quantitative meta-analysis. Binding potentials in the striatum and demographic, clinical, and methodological variables were extracted from each publication or obtained directly from authors. Hedges' g was used as a measure of effect size in an analysis using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. Publication bias was assessed with funnel plots and Egger's intercept. Heterogeneity was addressed with the Q statistic and I2 index. RESULTS: Striatal dopamine transporter density was 14% higher on average in the ADHD group than in the healthy comparison group. However, heterogeneity across studies was large and statistically significant. Meta-regression analyses showed that the percentage of subjects without exposure to psychostimulants was negatively correlated with dopamine transporter density; density was higher in patients with previous medication exposure and lower in medication-naive patients. There was no moderating effect for age, comorbidity, gender, year of publication, or imaging technique. There was no publication bias, and sensitivity analysis confirmed robustness of the results. CONCLUSIONS: Striatal dopamine transporter density in ADHD appears to depend on previous psychostimulant exposure, with lower density in drug-naive subjects and higher density in previously medicated patients.
BACKGROUND: Striatal dopamine transporter abnormalities are thought to underlie the pathophysiology and psychostimulant treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, individual studies using single photon emission tomography (SPECT) or positron emission tomography (PET) have yielded inconsistent results, i.e., both high and low striatal dopamine transporter levels. METHOD: Nine SPECT and PET studies investigating striatal dopamine transporter density in ADHDpatients (N=169) and age-, gender-, and IQ-matched healthy comparison subjects (N=173) were included in a quantitative meta-analysis. Binding potentials in the striatum and demographic, clinical, and methodological variables were extracted from each publication or obtained directly from authors. Hedges' g was used as a measure of effect size in an analysis using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. Publication bias was assessed with funnel plots and Egger's intercept. Heterogeneity was addressed with the Q statistic and I2 index. RESULTS: Striatal dopamine transporter density was 14% higher on average in the ADHD group than in the healthy comparison group. However, heterogeneity across studies was large and statistically significant. Meta-regression analyses showed that the percentage of subjects without exposure to psychostimulants was negatively correlated with dopamine transporter density; density was higher in patients with previous medication exposure and lower in medication-naive patients. There was no moderating effect for age, comorbidity, gender, year of publication, or imaging technique. There was no publication bias, and sensitivity analysis confirmed robustness of the results. CONCLUSIONS: Striatal dopamine transporter density in ADHD appears to depend on previous psychostimulant exposure, with lower density in drug-naive subjects and higher density in previously medicated patients.
Authors: Jordy van Enkhuizen; Mark A Geyer; Arpi Minassian; William Perry; Brook L Henry; Jared W Young Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2015-08-19 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Amy R Altszuler; Anne S Morrow; Brittany M Merrill; Shannon Bressler; Fiona L Macphee; Elizabeth M Gnagy; Andrew R Greiner; Stefany Coxe; Joseph S Raiker; Erika Coles; William E Pelham Journal: J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol Date: 2017-01-19
Authors: Anita D Barber; Deepak K Sarpal; Majnu John; Christina L Fales; Stewart H Mostofsky; Anil K Malhotra; Katherine H Karlsgodt; Todd Lencz Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2019-02-06 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Jordy van Enkhuizen; David S Janowsky; Berend Olivier; Arpi Minassian; William Perry; Jared W Young; Mark A Geyer Journal: Eur J Pharmacol Date: 2014-08-05 Impact factor: 4.432
Authors: Corinde E Wiers; Falk W Lohoff; Jisoo Lee; Christine Muench; Clara Freeman; Amna Zehra; Stefano Marenco; Barbara K Lipska; Pavan K Auluck; Ningping Feng; Hui Sun; David Goldman; James M Swanson; Gene-Jack Wang; Nora D Volkow Journal: Eur J Neurosci Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 3.386
Authors: Vitria Adisetiyo; Jens H Jensen; Ali Tabesh; Rachael L Deardorff; Els Fieremans; Adriana Di Martino; Kevin M Gray; Francisco X Castellanos; Joseph A Helpern Journal: Radiology Date: 2014-06-17 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Marieke E van der Schaaf; Sean J Fallon; Niels Ter Huurne; Jan Buitelaar; Roshan Cools Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2013-04-23 Impact factor: 7.853