Literature DB >> 22294208

Computational assessment of bicuspid aortic valve wall-shear stress: implications for calcific aortic valve disease.

Santanu Chandra1, Nalini M Rajamannan, Philippe Sucosky.   

Abstract

The bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is associated with a high prevalence of calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD). Although abnormal hemodynamics has been proposed as a potential pathogenic contributor, the native BAV hemodynamic stresses remain largely unknown. Fluid-structure interaction models were designed to quantify the regional BAV leaflet wall-shear stress over the course of CAVD. Systolic flow and leaflet dynamics were computed in two-dimensional tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) and type-1 BAV geometries with different degree of asymmetry (10 and 16% eccentricity) using an arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian approach. Valvular performance and regional leaflet wallshear stress were quantified in terms of valve effective orifice area (EOA), oscillatory shear index (OSI) and temporal shear magnitude (TSM). The dependence of those characteristics on the degree of leaflet calcification was also investigated. The models predicted an average reduction of 49% in BAV peak-systolic EOA relative to the TAV. Regardless of the anatomy, the leaflet wall-shear stress was side-specific and characterized by high magnitude and pulsatility on the ventricularis and low magnitude and oscillations on the fibrosa. While the TAV and non-coronary BAV leaflets shared similar shear stress characteristics, the base of the fused BAV leaflet fibrosa exhibited strong abnormalities, which were modulated by the degree of calcification (6-fold, 10-fold and 16-fold TSM increase in the normal, mildly and severely calcified BAV, respectively, relative to the normal TAV). This study reveals the existence of major differences in wall-shear stress pulsatility and magnitude on TAV and BAV leaflets. Given the ability of abnormal fluid shear stress to trigger valvular inflammation, the results support the existence of a mechano-etiology of CAVD in the BAV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22294208     DOI: 10.1007/s10237-012-0375-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol        ISSN: 1617-7940


  40 in total

1.  Bicuspid aortic valve hemodynamics does not promote remodeling in porcine aortic wall concavity.

Authors:  Samantha K Atkins; Alison N Moore; Philippe Sucosky
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2016-01-26

2.  Fluid-structure interaction modeling of calcific aortic valve disease using patient-specific three-dimensional calcification scans.

Authors:  Rotem Halevi; Ashraf Hamdan; Gil Marom; Karin Lavon; Sagit Ben-Zekry; Ehud Raanani; Danny Bluestein; Rami Haj-Ali
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  A novel bioreactor for mechanobiological studies of engineered heart valve tissue formation under pulmonary arterial physiological flow conditions.

Authors:  Sharan Ramaswamy; Steven M Boronyak; Trung Le; Andrew Holmes; Fotis Sotiropoulos; Michael S Sacks
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Etiology of bicuspid aortic valve disease: Focus on hemodynamics.

Authors:  Samantha K Atkins; Philippe Sucosky
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-12-26

5.  Clinical-pathological correlations of BAV and the attendant thoracic aortopathies. Part 1: Pluridisciplinary perspective on their hemodynamics and morphomechanics.

Authors:  Ares Pasipoularides
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 5.000

Review 6.  Review of numerical methods for simulation of mechanical heart valves and the potential for blood clotting.

Authors:  Mohamad Shukri Zakaria; Farzad Ismail; Masaaki Tamagawa; Ahmad Fazli Abdul Aziz; Surjatin Wiriadidjaja; Adi Azrif Basri; Kamarul Arifin Ahmad
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Coronary Flow Impacts Aortic Leaflet Mechanics and Aortic Sinus Hemodynamics.

Authors:  Brandon L Moore; Lakshmi Prasad Dasi
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 8.  Computational modeling of cardiac valve function and intervention.

Authors:  Wei Sun; Caitlin Martin; Thuy Pham
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 9.590

9.  Aortic sinus flow stasis likely in valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Hoda Hatoum; Brandon L Moore; Pablo Maureira; Jennifer Dollery; Juan A Crestanello; Lakshmi Prasad Dasi
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Numerical evaluation of transcatheter aortic valve performance during heart beating and its post-deployment fluid-structure interaction analysis.

Authors:  Ram P Ghosh; Gil Marom; Matteo Bianchi; Karl D'souza; Wojtek Zietak; Danny Bluestein
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2020-02-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.