Literature DB >> 22294059

Differences in lercanidipine systemic exposure when administered according to labelling: in fasting state and 15 minutes before food intake.

Covadonga Álvarez1, Estrella Gómez, Marta Simón, Carlos Govantes, Pedro Guerra, Jesús Frías, Alfredo García-Arieta.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the systemic exposure of lercanidipine (Zanidip) after oral administration in the fasted state and 15 min before food intake (meals) to investigate if the recommendations in the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) with respect to the intake of meals are adequate.
METHODS: The results of three pilot bioequivalence studies performed to develop a lercanidipine generic product, where Zanidip was administered consistently as reference product in the fasted state or 15 min before a standard breakfast, were compared to estimate the drug–food interaction and the similarity of the methods of administration defined in the SPC.
RESULTS: The ingestion of a standard (non-high-fat, non-high-calorie) meal 15 min after drug intake increased the area under the concentration–time curve (AUC(0-t)) of S-lercanidipine by 1.78-fold [90% confidence interval (CI) 1.48–2.15, P<0.0001] and the maximum concentration (Cmax) of Slercanidipine by 1.82-fold (90% CI 1.46–2.28, P<0.0001). These values are close to the twofold increase that has been described when Zanidip was taken immediately after a carbohydrate-rich meal. Higher levels would be expected with a high-fat, high-calorie meal.
CONCLUSIONS: As intake with a carbohydrate-rich meal is not recommended in the SPC of Zanidip because a twofold difference was considered to be clinically relevant, the intake of lercanidipine only 15 min before food intake does not seem to be consistent with this recommendation. The Marketing Authorisation Holder should clarify the dosing instructions in relation to meals and identify a sufficient time-lapse to ensure an exposure similar to that obtained in phase III clinical efficacy studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22294059     DOI: 10.1007/s00228-012-1215-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  6 in total

1.  Enantioselective pharmacokinetics of lercanidipine in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Valquiria Aparecida Polisel Jabor; Eduardo Barbosa Coelho; Vera Lucia Lanchote
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2004-12-25       Impact factor: 3.205

Review 2.  Treatment of essential hypertension with calcium channel blockers: what is the place of lercanidipine?

Authors:  Michel Burnier; Menno Pruijm; Gregoire Wuerzner
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.481

3.  Mechanistic understanding of time-dependent oral absorption based on gastric motor activity in humans.

Authors:  Kazutaka Higaki; Sally Y Choe; Raimar Löbenberg; Lynda S Welage; Gordon L Amidon
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 5.571

Review 4.  Lercanidipine : a review of its efficacy in the management of hypertension.

Authors:  Lynne M Bang; Therese M Chapman; Karen L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Lercanidipine in the treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  Cherylyn Beckey; Amber Lundy; Nahla Lutfi
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 6.  Lercanidipine in hypertension.

Authors:  Claudio Borghi
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2005
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.