Literature DB >> 22293934

Radical cystectomy for clinically muscle invasive bladder cancer: does prior non-invasive disease affect clinical outcomes?

Ahmed F Kotb1, Evan Kovac, Wassim Kassouf, Joe Chin, Yves Fradet, Jonathan Izawa, Eric Estey, Adrian Fairey, Ricardo Rendon, Ilias Cagiannos, Louis Lacombe, Jean-Baptiste Lattouf, David Bell, Darrel Drachenberg, Armen G Aprikian.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare clinical and pathologic outcomes of radical cystectomy for muscle invasive bladder cancer in relation to prior history of non-invasive urothelial carcinoma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective data collected from 1,150 patients managed by radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder from the Canadian Bladder Cancer Network were analysed. Patients with clinical stage T2 or more were included and divided into two groups: (Group 1) patients with prior history of non-invasive urothelial carcinoma (N = 365) and (Group 2) patients with clinical muscle invasive cancer de novo (N = 785). Variables analysed included patient age, gender, pathologic stage, adjuvant chemotherapy, recurrence and mortality.
RESULTS: Both groups were nearly equal in mean age and gender distribution, with mean ages of 67.2 and 66.7 years, and 79.7 and 79.5%, respectively (P = 0.4 and 0.9, respectively). The presence of preoperative hydronephrosis was 20.8 and 32.6% (P = 0.0007) for groups 1 and 2, respectively. The rate of higher pathological stage (T3 or T4) was 36.3 and 58% (P < 0.0001), positive lymph nodes were 20.1 and 28.8% (P = 0.002), and lymphovascular invasion was 31.7 and 46.2% (P = 0.0001) for groups 1 and 2, respectively. The rate of adjuvant chemotherapy was 15.5 and 23.3% (P = 0.002) for groups 1 and 2, respectively. None of the sampled patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) rates at 5 years were 62 and 70% for group 1 and 51 and 60% for group 2, respectively, while at 10 years, OS and DSS were 46 and 66% for group 1 and 35 and 49% for group 2, respectively (P = 0.0001 and 0.0002, respectively). Using multivariate analysis examining factors affecting recurrence and survival, we found that previous non-invasive bladder tumour history was associated with a significantly reduced risk of mortality and recurrence (Hazard ratio of 0.7 for all risks, P = 0.0002).
CONCLUSION: Our retrospective study suggests that patients with non-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder that progress to muscle invasion and require radical cystectomy appear to have better pathologic and clinical outcome than patients presenting with clinical muscle invasive disease de novo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22293934     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-012-0832-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  15 in total

1.  Repeated transurethral resection of recurrent superficial bladder tumors--does it affect the spread and stage of the tumor?

Authors:  A A El-Abbady; M S Shoukry; A G Hanno; L K Younis; M Abdel-Rahman
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  2002-02

2.  Does early cystectomy improve the survival of patients with high risk superficial bladder tumors?

Authors:  H W Herr; P C Sogani
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  De novo muscle invasive bladder cancer: is there a change in trend?

Authors:  A Vaidya; M S Soloway; C Hawke; R Tiguert; F Civantos
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Early vs delayed radical cystectomy for 'high-risk' carcinoma not invading bladder muscle: delay of cystectomy reduces cancer-specific survival.

Authors:  Wolfgang Jäger; Christian Thomas; Silke Haag; Christian Hampel; Alice Salzer; Joachim W Thüroff; Christoph Wiesner
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Early-stage bladder cancer surveillance does not improve survival if high-risk patients are permitted to progress to muscle invasion.

Authors:  Cheryl T Lee; Rodney L Dunn; Collette Ingold; James E Montie; David P Wood
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Survival after cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  R R de Vries; J A Nieuwenhuijzen; A Vincent; H van Tinteren; S Horenblas
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 4.424

7.  Primary invasive versus progressive invasive transitional cell bladder cancer: multicentric study of overall survival rate.

Authors:  Ubirajara Ferreira; Wagner Eduardo Matheus; Renato Nardi Pedro; Carlos Alturo Levi D'Ancona; Leonardo Oliveira Reis; Rafael Mamprin Stopiglia; Fernandes Denardi; Nelson Rodrigues Netto; Stênio de Cássio Zequi; Francisco Paulo da Fonseca; Ademar Lopes; Gustavo Cardoso Guimarães; Roni de Carvalho Fernandes; Marjo Deninson Cardenuto Perez
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Cancer statistics, 2009.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Elizabeth Ward; Yongping Hao; Jiaquan Xu; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Survival rates after radical cystectomy according to tumor stage of bladder carcinoma at first presentation.

Authors:  Matthias May; Christian Helke; Thomas Nitzke; Horst Vogler; Bernd Hoschke
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Prognosis of muscle-invasive bladder cancer: difference between primary and progressive tumours and implications for therapy.

Authors:  Barthold Ph Schrier; Maarten P Hollander; Bas W G van Rhijn; Lambertus A L M Kiemeney; J Alfred Witjes
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  5 in total

1.  The Impact of Primary Versus Secondary Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer at Diagnosis on the Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  David D'Andrea; Shahrokh F Shariat; Francesco Soria; Andrea Mari; Laura S Mertens; Ettore Di Trapani; Diego M Carrion; Benjamin Pradere; Renate Pichler; Ronan Filippot; Guillaume Grisay; Francesco Del Giudice; Ekaterina Laukhtina; David Paulnsteiner; Wojciech Krajewski; Sonia Vallet; Martina Maggi; Ettore De Berardinis; Mario Álvarez-Maestro; Stephan Brönimann; Fabrizio Di Maida; Bas W G van Rhijn; Kees Hendricksen; Marco Moschini
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-05-28

Review 2.  High-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: update for a better identification and treatment.

Authors:  Oscar Rodriguez Faba; Joan Palou; Alberto Breda; H Villavicencio
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Lymph node density in muscle-invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder; De novo versus progressive disease.

Authors:  Ahmed Elabbady; Mohamed Mohieeldin Hashad; Ahmed Fouad Kotb; Dina Mohamed Abdullah; Ahmad Beltagy
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

Review 4.  Differential Prognosis and Response of Denovo vs. Secondary Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mario Pones; David D'Andrea; Keiichiro Mori; Mohammad Abufraj; Marco Moschini; Eva Comperat; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Oncological Outcome of Primary and Secondary Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peng Ge; Li Wang; Meng Lu; Lijun Mao; Wang Li; Rumin Wen; Jian Lin; Junqi Wang; Jiacun Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.