| Literature DB >> 22293172 |
Sergio Uribe1, Lina Cadavid, Tarique Hussain, Rodrigo Parra, Gonzalo Urcelay, Felipe Heusser, Marcelo Andía, Cristian Tejos, Pablo Irarrazaval.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Isolated left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC) is an uncommon disorder characterized by the presence of increased trabeculations and deep intertrabecular recesses. In adults, it has been found that ejection fraction (EF) decreases significantly as non-compaction severity increases. In children however, there are a few data describing the relation between anatomical characteristics of LVNC and ventricular function. We aimed to find correlations between morphological features and ventricular performance in children and young adolescents with LVNC using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22293172 PMCID: PMC3289040 DOI: 10.1186/1532-429X-14-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson ISSN: 1097-6647 Impact factor: 5.364
Imaging Parameters of CMR scans
| Parameter | Cine b-SSFP | MRA | Flow | LGE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOV (FH-AP-RL) (mm) | 390 × 255 | 280 × 240 × 140 | 300 × 270 | 390 × 255 |
| Acquired Resolution (mm) | 2 × 2 | 2 × 2 × 2 | 2.1 × 2.1 | 1.5 × 1.5 |
| Reconstructed Resolution (mm) | 1.6 × 1.6 | 1 × 1 × 1 | 1.15 × 1.15 | 1.5 |
| Slice thickness (mm) | 8 | 2 | 10 | 7 |
| Nr of slices | 1 | 110 - 180 | 1 | 3 |
| TR/TE (ms) | 2.9/1.5 | 3.8/1.9 | 4.7/2.6 | 3.2/1.6 |
| TFE factor | 9 - 13 | 15-20 | 3 - 4 | 10 |
| Grappa | 2 AP | 2 AP 1-1.5 RL | no | no |
| flip angle | 60 | 60 | 15 | 15 |
| Nr cardiac phases | 20-30 | 2 | 20-40 | 1 |
| Temporal Resolution (ms) | 30 | 60 | 28.2 | 70 |
| Triggering modality | Retrospective | none | Retrospective | Gate |
| Averages | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| Venc (cm/s) | NA | NA | 150-300 | NA |
| LGE late gadolinium enhancement | ||||
| AP anterior posterior | ||||
| RL right left | ||||
Summary of the analyzed functional and morphological CMR parameters.
| EF (%) | EDV (cc/m2) | ESV (cc/m2) | CMM (g/m2) | CMA (cm2/m2) | NCMA (cm2/m2) | NC/C distance ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.69/10.93 | 83.99/14.94 | 40.67/13.17 | 61.47/16.79 | 21.68/6.46 | 25.47/8.33 | 3,83/0,79 | |
| 28.40- 64.20 | 60.10-111.80 | 27.40- 80.00 | 44.50-105.40 | 15.95 - 40.22 | 15.91-49.09 | 2.57 -5.05 |
EF, ejection Fraction
EDV, end-diastolic Volume
ESV, end-systolic volume
CMM, compacted myocardial mass
CMA, compacted myocardial Area
NCMA, non compacted myocardial area.
NC/C, non-compaction divided by compaction
Description of CMR morphological and cardiac function findings in children and young adolescent with isolated LVNC.
| Patient | Age y.o | EF % | EF < 50% | Abnormal CMM | Diastolic Dysfunction | LGE | NC/C ratio | Wall Motion Abnormalities | Numbers of LV segments with NC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.4 | 58 | No | Yes | No | N/A | 4,7 | Nono | 6 |
| 2 | 14.1 | 64.2 | No | No | No | N/A | 4,6 | No | 3 |
| 3 | 3.4 | N/A | 5 | Yes | |||||
| 4 | 17 | 53.5 | No | Yes | No | N/A | 2,9 | No | 6 |
| 5 | 14.1 | 53.3 | No | No | No | Negative | 3,7 | No | 4 |
| 6 | 8.9 | 61.6 | No | Yes | No | Negative | 3,7 | No | 4 |
| 7 | 14.1 | 54.4 | No | No | No | N/A | 3,7 | No | 6 |
| 8 | 11.5 | 63.4 | No | No | No | Negative | 3,7 | No | 6 |
| 9 | 0.6 | Negative | 4,7 | Yes | |||||
| 10 | 4.3 | N/A | 5 | Yes | |||||
| 11 | 13.1 | 60.5 | No | Yes | No | Negative | 3 | No | 4 |
| 12 | 11.2 | 53.6 | No | No | Yes | N/A | 2,6 | No | 4 |
| 13 | 1.9 | N/A | 3,6 | Yes | |||||
| 14 | 5.5 | Negative | 3,6 | Yes | |||||
| 15 | 14.8 | 61.2 | No | No | No | Negative | 3 | Yes | 6 |
CMM, compacted myocardial Mass
EF, ejection Fraction
LGE, Late gadolinium enhancement
NC/C, non-compaction divided by compaction
LV, left ventricular
N/A, not applicable
Figure 1Linear regression and correlations between EF and different morphological measurements. There was a low correlation between all these parameters and EF. None of these measurements are a good indicator of ventricular performance in children with isolated LVNC. (Compacted mass is in g/m2 and measures of areas are in cm2/m2).
Figure 2Linear regression and correlations. Linear regression and correlations between myocardial compacted mass, non compacted area, and compacted area with ESV and EDV were higher than those found in for EF (Figure 1). However, linear regression plots were also scattered indicating a poor linear relationship between these morphological indexes and ESV or EDV. (LV-ESV and LV-EDV are in cc/m2, compacted mass in g/m2 and measures of area are in cm2/m2).
Distribution of non-compaction in different segments at different levels of the left ventricle.
| Basal | Med | Apical | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anterior | 2 | 6 | 13 | |
| Inferior | 2 | 4 | 10 | |
| Septal | NA | NA | 4 | |
| Lateral | NA | NA | 15 | |
| Anteroseptal | 0 | 0 | NA | |
| Inferoseptal | 0 | 0 | NA | |
| Inferolateral | 4 | 12 | NA | |
| Anterolateral | 4 | 12 | NA | |
Figure 3Distribution of segments with LVNC in all patients. Those patients with more than 9 affected segments were the only ones with compromise of left ventricular performance. Basal segment involvement tended to occur in more severe cases.
Figure 4A five years old female with EF 41.5%. Steady-state free precession magnetic resonance imaging in a Long Axis (a), four-chamber (b) and short-axis (c, d, e) views demonstrate extensive trabeculations of the LV wall in the basal (e), mid (d) and apical segments (c).
Figure 5Result of the 17-segment analysis of wall motion abnormality and non compation (numbers indicate degree of wall motion abnormalities according to text). These patient were the only ones who had wall motion abnormalities and and Ejection Fraction (EF) < 53%. Interestingly, in the more severe cases there were wall motion abnormalities in septal segments non-affected by no compaction.