Literature DB >> 2229273

Effects of hormonal status on bone density in adolescent girls.

S Dhuper1, M P Warren, J Brooks-Gunn, R Fox.   

Abstract

Few data are available on bone density in late adolescence. We studied factors affecting peak bone density in females. Forty-three white girls, aged 13-20 yr, were studied. Integrated estrogen exposure over the pubertal years was obtained by a score based on physiological events known to reflect circulation estrogen levels. The subjects were selected to provide great variation in estrogen exposure. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by single photon absorptiometry (midradius) and dual photon absorptiometry (spine and first metatarsal of the foot). Weight, estrogen score, and testosterone levels were highly correlated with BMD of the spine, wrist, and foot (P less than 0.05). Age correlated positively only with the BMD of the wrist. Twenty-four girls reaching ages 18-20 yr in the 2 yr of observation were divided into groups reflecting low (less than 24), medium (25-48), and high (greater than or equal to 49) estrogen exposure. The lowest scoring groups had the lowest spine and wrist BMD (P less than 0.05). This group weighed less and had lower weight to height ratio (P less than 0.05), the lowest weight (P less than 0.05) during adolescence, the highest age of menarche, and the highest amount of fiber in the diet (P less than 0.05). These subjects were separated into low and high BMD groups. Those subjects with the lowest values for spine, wrist, and foot were found to have significantly lower estrogen exposure scores and lower weight/height ratios; in addition, low BMD of the foot was associated with higher activity levels. Thus, wrist and spine BMD are affected by estrogen exposure during adolescence and weight; foot BMD, in addition, was negatively affected by activity, suggesting that bone mass in the active adolescent is affected by the absence of estrogen exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2229273     DOI: 10.1210/jcem-71-5-1083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  25 in total

Review 1.  Effects of hormonal contraceptives on bone mineral density.

Authors:  B A Cromer
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Estrogen status and heredity are major determinants of premenopausal bone mass.

Authors:  R Armamento-Villareal; D T Villareal; L V Avioli; R Civitelli
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Short-term delay of puberty causes a transient reduction in bone strength in growing female rats.

Authors:  Vanessa R Yingling; Amit Khaneja
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2005-08-19       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 4.  Effects of physical activity on some components of the skeletal system.

Authors:  N Maffulli; J B King
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Evaluation of movements of lower limbs in non-professional ballet dancers: hip abduction and flexion.

Authors:  Erica E Valenti; Vitor E Valenti; Celso Ferreira; Luiz Carlos M Vanderlei; Oseas F Moura Filho; Tatiana Dias de Carvalho; Nadir Tassi; Marcio Petenusso; Claudio Leone; Edison N Fujiki; Hugo Macedo Junior; Carlos B de Mello Monteiro; Isadora L Moreno; Ana Clara Cr Gonçalves; Luiz Carlos de Abreu
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol       Date:  2011-08-05

6.  Bone mineral content in cystic fibrosis patients: correlation with fat-free mass.

Authors:  F Salamoni; M Roulet; F Gudinchet; M Pilet; D Thiébaud; P Burckhardt
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Early menopause, number of reproductive years, and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  D Kritz-Silverstein; E Barrett-Connor
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Bone mineral density in hyperandrogenic amenorrhoea.

Authors:  J Prezelj; A Kocijancic
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 9.  Optimizing peak bone mass: what are the therapeutic possibilities?

Authors:  S Adami
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Can vigorous exercise play a role in osteoporosis prevention? A review.

Authors:  B Gutin; M J Kasper
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.