CDK9 is the kinase of positive transcription elongation factor b and facilitates the transition of paused RNA polymerase II to processive transcription elongation. CDK9 is a validated target for the treatment of cancer, cardiac hypertrophy, and human immunodeficiency virus. Here we analyze different CDK9/cyclin T variants to identify a form of the complex amenable to use in inhibitor design. To demonstrate the utility of this system, we have determined the crystal structures of CDK9/cyclin T and CDK2/cyclin A bound to the CDK9-specific inhibitor CAN508. Comparison of the structures reveals CDK9-specific conformational changes and identifies a CDK9-specific hydrophobic pocket, adjacent to the αC-helix. By comparison with a previously published structure of CDK9/cyclin T/human immunodeficiency virus TAT we find that the CDK9 αC-helix has a degree of conformational variability that has the potential to be exploited for inhibitor design.
CDK9 is the kinase of positive transcription elongation factor b and facilitates the transition of paused RNA polymerase II to processive transcription elongation. CDK9 is a validated target for the treatment of cancer, cardiac hypertrophy, and human immunodeficiency virus. Here we analyze different CDK9/cyclin T variants to identify a form of the complex amenable to use in inhibitor design. To demonstrate the utility of this system, we have determined the crystal structures of CDK9/cyclin T and CDK2/cyclin A bound to the CDK9-specific inhibitor CAN508. Comparison of the structures reveals CDK9-specific conformational changes and identifies a CDK9-specific hydrophobic pocket, adjacent to the αC-helix. By comparison with a previously published structure of CDK9/cyclin T/human immunodeficiency virus TAT we find that the CDK9 αC-helix has a degree of conformational variability that has the potential to be exploited for inhibitor design.
Many cancer cells rely on the
production of anti-apoptotic factors for their survival. Inhibition
of mRNA synthesis and the consequent down regulation of anti-apoptotic
factors is therefore an attractive strategy for cancer treatment.
mRNA synthesis by RNA polymerase II (pol II) is regulated by the phosphorylation
of its C-terminal domain (CTD) by a range of cyclin-dependent kinases
(CDKs) CDK7–CDK9, CDK12, and CDK13. Since the discovery that
the CDK inhibitor flavopiridol induces apoptosis by inhibiting CDK9,[1] the enzyme has been a target for anticancer drug
design. Subsequent studies established that other CDK inhibitors exploit
the same mechanism.[2−8] In addition to oncology, CDK9 has also been validated as a drug
target in virology and cardiology.[9,10] While there
are several promising compounds with high affinity for CDK9, their
selectivity toward this CDK family member is limited. To exploit CDK9
inhibition for the treatment of these diseases, it is crucial to obtain
CDK inhibitors with a high degree of selectivity and potency for CDK9.CAN508 is an arylazopyrazole compound that inhibits CDK9 with an
IC50 of 0.35 μM and exhibits a 38-fold selectivity
for CDK9/cyclin T over other CDK/cyclin complexes.[3] As is consistent with these properties, CAN508 treatment
inhibits the growth of various cancer cell lines and induces apoptosis
through mechanisms that include inhibition of pol II CTD phosphorylation
and mRNA synthesis, and induction of the tumor suppressor protein
p53.[3,11] More recently, CAN508 has also been shown
to inhibit angiogenesis through a CDK9-dependent mechanism.[11]Structure-aided drug design requires readily
crystallizable protein
that can routinely generate inhibitor co-crystals diffracting to sufficient
resolution. To date, structures of the apo form of CDK9/cyclin T as
well as complexes bound to ATP and CDK9-selective inhibitors have
been determined.[12,13] In addition the structure of
a CDK9/cyclin T/HIV TAT complex has been reported.[14]Here we evaluate the usefulness of the existing CDK9/cyclinT
crystal
systems for inhibitor design studies. A comparison of the different
crystal forms reveals that CDK9/cyclin T has a degree of conformational
flexibility that can be exploited for inhibitor design. Serendipitous
mutations in CDK9/cyclin T resulted in a form of the complex that
has produced crystals that diffract up to 2.5 Å resolution.[12] We show that this mutated form has largely unaltered
kinetic, structural, and inhibitor binding properties but offers a
number of advantages over the wild-type protein for inhibitor design
studies. To demonstrate the advantages of comparative CDK structural
studies for the design of selective CDK9 inhibitors, we have solved
the crystal structures of active CDK9/cyclin T and CDK2/cyclin A bound
to the inhibitor CAN508. Comparison of the CDK9/cyclin T- and CDK2/cyclin
A-CAN508 co-crystal structures reveals that the inhibitor adopts slightly
different orientations within the ATP binding sites of the two kinases.
Our results identify a CDK9-specific hydrophobic pocket that may be
exploited to design inhibitors with increased selectivity toward CDK9.The CDK9/cyclin T crystal form used for inhibitor binding studies
to date was first reported by Baumli and colleagues.[12] This crystal form offers a number of advantages for inhibitor
studies, namely: (i) reproducible crystallization conditions that
generate crystals that diffract to 2.5–3.0 Å resolution,
(ii) a CDK9 ATP binding site that is freely accessible for inhibitor
soaking experiments, and (iii) a lack of crystal contacts at the ATP
binding site that would preclude inhibitor-induced conformational
changes. These crystals result from a CDK9/cyclin T complex that contains
three point mutations in the cyclin T sequence at residues Q77R, E96G,
and F241L,[12] and we therefore designate
the triple mutant CDK9/cyclin TQ77R/E96G/F241L.While CDK9/cyclin TQ77R/E96G/F241L crystallizes
reliably,
attempts to crystallize wild-type cyclin T in complex with CDK9 resulted
in very small crystals that proved unsuitable for structural analysis.
We therefore investigated the locations of the three mutations in
the crystal structure. F241L is located in the C-terminal cyclin helix
that is involved in crystal contacts. The mutation might contribute
to the improved crystallization properties of CDK9/cyclin TQ77R/E96G/F241L. Q77R lies on a surface loop on cyclin T and is a natural variant
of the cyclin sequence (UniProt entry: O60563). E96G is located at the CDK/cyclin
interface, and mutation to a glycine residue might influence the interaction
of cyclin T with CDK9.To dissect the contributions that each
mutation makes to the structure
of CDK9/cyclin TQ77R/E96G/F241L, we crystallized a complex
that is wild-type at cyclin T positions Gln77 and Glu96 but retains
the F241L mutation to aid crystallization. We solved the structure
of this complex at 3.2 Å resolution (Table 1). In
CDK9/cyclin TF241L Glu96 of cyclin T hydrogen bonds to
and reorients the side chain
of CDK9 Arg65. Both cyclin T Glu96 and CDK9 Arg65 participate in the
same hydrogen bonding network that is observed in the CDK9/cyclin
T/TAT structure (PDB id: 3MI9).[14] Despite the additional contact between the CDK and cyclin subunits
the structure is very similar to that of CDK9/cyclin TQ77R/E96G/F241L (rmsd 0.93 Å over all CDK9 atoms compared to 3BLH and rmsd
1.3 Å compared to 3MI9; Supplementary Figure
S1, Supplementary Table 1). The
side chain of Gln77, like Arg77 in the CDK9/cyclin TQ77R/E96G/F241L structure, points out into solvent and makes no intra- or intermolecular
contacts. Taken together these results indicate that the mutations
present in CDK9/cyclin TQ77R/E96G/F241L do not influence
the overall conformations of CDK9, cyclin T, or the CDK9/cyclin T
complex. In particular we can exclude the possibility that conformational
differences between PDB id's 3MI9 and 3BLH result from the E96G mutation in cyclin T present in PDB id 3BLH.
Table 1
Crystallographic Parameters
CDK9/cyclin TQ77R/E96G/F241L/CAN508
CDK9/cyclin TF241L/CAN508
CDK9/cyclin TF241L
CDK2/cyclin
A/CAN508
Data Collection
beamline
ESRF ID29
DLS
I24
DLS I24
DLS I02
space group
H3
H3
H3
P212121
unit cell (Å)
a = b = 173.42;c = 97.9
a = b = 173.30;c = 97.22
a = b = 173.6;c = 97.47
a = 74.05; b = 134.57; c = 148.28
α = β = 90°; γ = 120°
α = β = 90°; γ = 120°
α = β = 90°; γ = 120°
α = β = γ = 90°
resolution (highest resolution
shell) (Å)
43.36–2.95 (3.11–2.95)
49.00–3.20 (3.29–3.20)
59.52–3.23 (3.41–3.23)
44.86–2.00 (2.11–2.00)
total
observations
84542 (12557)
61839 (4669)
58769 (8830)
397326 (56907)
unique
23081 (3394)
17892 (1327)
17300 (2557)
100421 (14505)
Rmerge
0.072 (0.59)
0.051 (0.54)
0.070 (0.49)
10.3 (0.57)
multiplicity
3.7 (3.7)
3.5 (3.5)
3.4 (3.5)
4.0 (3.9)
mean I/σI
13.3 (1.9)
15.1 (2.0)
9.9 (2.4)
8.8 (2.2)
completeness
99.8% (100%)
99.8% (99.9%)
98.8% (99.7%)
99.8% (97.0%)
Refinement Statistics
highest
resolution shell
(Å)
3.08–2.95
3.40–3.20
3.44–3.23
2.02–2.00
total no. of atoms
4587
4358
4489
18970
no. of waters
8
NA
NA
913
R
0.176 (0.314)
0.177 (0.259)
0.163 (0.242)
0.1877 (0.269)
Rfree (highest resolution shell)
0.221 (0.358)
0.226 (0.318)
0.210 (0.310)
0.2266 (0.301)
rms bonds
0.005
0.013
0.009
0.007
rms angles
0.842
1.526
1.344
1.038
Although they do not introduce a significant structural
perturbation,
the mutations present in CDK9/cyclin TQ77R/E96G/F241L might affect CDK9/cyclin T stability and kinetic
parameters. To test this hypothesis, we first analyzed the thermal
stability of the CDK9/cyclin T variants. While CDK/cyclin complexes
composed of either the wild-type proteins or cyclin TF241L have very similar melting temperatures (Tm) of 52.6 ± 0.16 and 51.8 ± 1.1 °C, respectively,
the triple mutant complex, CDK9/cyclin TQ77R/E96G/F241L denatures at a lower temperature of 48.25 ± 0.58 °C (Supplementary Figure S2a). The lower Tm of this complex most likely results, at least
in part, from the loss of the hydrogen bonding network in which Glu96
participates.To determine whether this lowered Tm has an impact on inhibitor binding to the mutant CDK9/cyclin
T,
we employed differential scanning fluorimetry (DSF), a technique that
exploits the fact that ligand binding to a protein increases its thermal
stability and hence its apparent melting temperature (ΔTm). The ΔTm measured is related to the binding affinity of the ligand for the
protein and is dependent upon the ligand concentration. It also reflects
the constituent thermodynamic properties of the ligand binding event
that includes ΔS and ΔCp.[15] A set of ΔTm values measured
for a given enzyme bound to a diverse panel of ligands can, therefore,
provide a fingerprint that is characteristic of the ligand binding
properties of that enzyme. The fingerprints of two different enzymes
can be quantitatively compared by evaluating the R2 linear
correlation coefficient between sets of inhibitor-induced ΔTm values measured for those enzymes.To
analyze the effect of the cyclin T mutations on the interactions
between CDK9 and ATP-competitive inhibitors, we tested the ability
of known CDK9 inhibitors (DRB, CAN508, (S)-CR8, Roscovitine, Staurosporine,
AMPPNP, and Wang compound 8[2]) to stabilize
the different CDK9/cyclin T complexes. The profiles of inhibitor-induced Tm shifts for wild-type CDK9/cyclin T and the
mutant complexes are very similar (R2 >
0.93 for all combinations of CDK9/cyclin T variants tested (Figure 1a)). For comparison, the R2 value obtained when comparing the ΔTm values measured for CDK2/cyclin A with those obtained
for wild-type CDK9/cyclin T is significantly
lower (R2 = 0.33), as expected (Figure 1a). These results indicate that, despite slightly
lowering the enzyme's inherent Tm, the
three mutations within CDK9/cyclin TQ77R/E96G/F241L do
not result in detectable changes to the inhibitor binding properties
of the CDK9 ATP-binding site.
Figure 1
Comparison of different CDK9/cyclin T variants.
(a) Correlation
between inhibition profiles of CDK9/cyclin T variants and CDK2/cyclin A. Each data point represents
the average
ΔTm of three curves. The internal
correlation within a data set is R2 >
0.9. Individual denaturation profiles can be found in Supplementary Figure S2a. (b) Activity of CDK9/cyclin T and
CDK9/cyclin TQ77R/E96G/F241L in the presence of increasing
amounts of ATP. Measurements were done in triplicates and confirmed
in independent experiments. Error bars indicate standard errors.
Comparison of different CDK9/cyclin T variants.
(a) Correlation
between inhibition profiles of CDK9/cyclin T variants and CDK2/cyclin A. Each data point represents
the average
ΔTm of three curves. The internal
correlation within a data set is R2 >
0.9. Individual denaturation profiles can be found in Supplementary Figure S2a. (b) Activity of CDK9/cyclin T and
CDK9/cyclin TQ77R/E96G/F241L in the presence of increasing
amounts of ATP. Measurements were done in triplicates and confirmed
in independent experiments. Error bars indicate standard errors.Finally we analyzed whether the three cyclin T
mutations together
affect the catalytic activity of the CDK9/cyclin TQ77R/E96G/F241L complex. To this end we determined
the kinetic properties of both the wild-type and triple mutant complexes
with respect to the ATP substrate and the inhibitor CAN508. Both complexes
have a KMapp, ATP of 95 μM
(Figure 1b), indicating that ATP binding is
not affected by the presence of the mutations. This result is in agreement
with the results of the DSF experiments. However, we did observe a
decrease in the Vmax for the CDK9/cyclin
TQ77R/E96G/F241L complex (Figure 1b). CAN508 inhibits both kinase complexes with an IC50 of 0.75 μM (Supplementary Figure S2b), in good agreement with previously published results.[3]The close agreement between the ΔTm, KMapp, ATP, and CAN508 IC50 values for the wild-type and mutant
complexes indicates
that the mutations do not affect ATP or inhibitor binding to CDK9
or the complex’s catalytic activity. Taken together, our structural,
thermodynamic, and enzymatic experiments validate the use of CDK9/cyclin
TQ77R/E96G/F241L for structural analysis.To rationalize
the observed selectivity of CAN508 toward CDK9 over
other CDKs, we determined structures of CAN508 bound to CDK9/cyclin
T and to CDK2/cyclin A (Figure 2). We used
both CDK9/cyclin TF241L and CDK9/cyclin
TQ77R/E96G/F241L variants for our crystallographic
studies. In agreement with our observations described above, both
structures are highly similar, and the inhibitor electron density
within both CDK9 active sites supports a shared binding mode (Supplementary Figure S3).
Figure 2
Structures of CDK2/cyclin
A/CAN508 and CDK9/cyclin T/CAN508. (a)
CDK2 (orange) and CDK9 (green) are shown as ribbon representations,
with CAN508 molecules as stick models. The glycine-rich loop is indicated.
(b) Chemical structure of CAN508. (c, d) The CDK9/cyclin T (c) and
CDK2/cyclin A (d) ATP binding sites complexed with CAN508. Contacting
residues within 3.5 Å are drawn as stick models, and hydrogen
bonds are indicated by dotted lines. (e) Superposition of selected
ATP binding site residues in active CDK2 (orange) and CDK9 (green).
CDK9 residues are labeled. Figures were prepared using PyMOL.
Structures of CDK2/cyclin
A/CAN508 and CDK9/cyclin T/CAN508. (a)
CDK2 (orange) and CDK9 (green) are shown as ribbon representations,
with CAN508 molecules as stick models. The glycine-rich loop is indicated.
(b) Chemical structure of CAN508. (c, d) The CDK9/cyclin T (c) and
CDK2/cyclin A (d) ATP binding sites complexed with CAN508. Contacting
residues within 3.5 Å are drawn as stick models, and hydrogen
bonds are indicated by dotted lines. (e) Superposition of selected
ATP binding site residues in active CDK2 (orange) and CDK9 (green).
CDK9 residues are labeled. Figures were prepared using PyMOL.CAN508 binds to the ATP binding site located between
the N- and
C-terminal lobes of the CDK9 fold and is sandwiched between Ala46
in the N-terminal and Leu156 in the C-terminal lobe. As is observed
for most ATP-competitive inhibitors, CAN508 makes hydrogen bonds to
the CDK9 backbone in the hinge region.[16] N16 and N14 of the diaminopyrazole ring are a hydrogen bond donor
and acceptor, respectively, to the main chain oxygen of CDK9 Asp104
and the main chain nitrogen of Cys106, mimicking the interactions
made by N6 and N1 of the purine ring of ATP (Figure 2b).[12] In addition N13 contacts
the main chain oxygen of Cys106. All of these inhibitor–CDK
interactions are conserved in the CDK2-bound structure.In a
previously determined structure of CAN508 bound to monomeric
CDK2, the inhibitor has been described as adopting a different and
markedly strained conformation.[3] Our structure
of CAN508 bound to active CDK2/cyclin A is likely to provide a more
useful model by which to understand the selectivity displayed by the
inhibitor.Although CAN508 forms similar interactions when bound
to CDK9/cyclin
T and CDK2/cyclin A, there is an additional interaction between CAN508
N12 and the carbonyl group of Ile25 of CDK9, made possible by a movement
of the glycine-rich loop toward the ATP binding pocket (Figure 2a, c). This rearrangement of the active
site does not occur in CDK2 upon CAN508 binding but has been observed
to accompany the binding to CDK9 of a number of ATP-competitive inhibitors
with very different chemical scaffolds.[12,13] In all these
structures the glycine-rich loop is restrained in its downward position
by a concomitant downward movement of the β3-αC loop.
These movements cause the CDK9 glycine-rich loop residues to contribute
to the formation of a solvent-excluded channel into which inhibitors
are sequestered and are qualitatively different to inhibitor-induced
changes in CDK2. We note, however, that the glycine-rich loop is relatively
flexible in both apo and inhibitor bound conformations, as judged
from high temperature factors.The higher conformational variability
of CDK9 as compared to other
CDK/cyclin complexes may offer an opportunity to enhance inhibitor
potency and selectivity. In both CDK9/cyclin T/CAN508 structures,
conformational changes result in optimal accommodation of the inhibitor
in the ATP binding site. The ability to induce these CDK9-specific
conformational changes may be a general characteristic of inhibitors
that show good selectivity toward CDK9.The binding mode of
CAN508 to CDK2/cyclin A and to CDK9/cyclin
T is very similar, but the inhibitor does adopt somewhat different
orientations within the two ATP binding sites. The inhibitor phenolic
moiety forms an aromatic contact with the CDK9 gate-keeper residue
Phe103 (CDK2 Phe80) (d = 3.1 Å, interplanar
angle = 120°) and exploits the hydrophobic pocket lined by Phe168
at the back of the ATP binding site. Within the CDK9-bound structure,
the OH-group of the CAN508 phenolic moiety engages in a network of
hydrogen bonds with residues Glu66, Lys48, and the backbone nitrogen
of Phe168 (Figure 2c). In CDK2 this network
only extends to include Glu51 and Lys33 (Figure 2d). This difference results from the displacement of CDK9 Glu66 by
approximately 1 Å with respect to the CDK2 structure to generate
a larger binding pocket close to Phe168 that can better accommodate
the CAN508 phenolic group (Figure 2e, Supplementary Figure S3d). Interestingly, a CAN508
derivative lacking the OH group on its phenyl moiety still inhibits
CDK9 but not the other CDKs tested.[3] While
all phenyl derivatives tested showed activity toward CDK9, substitution
on the phenyl ring with an o-NO2 or m-OH moiety recovered some activity toward the other CDKs
possibly by forming equivalent hydrogen bonds to those made by the
phenolic OH of CAN508.The hydrophobic pocket in CDK9 exploited
by CAN508 results from
a displaced αC-helix. αC is the only helix in the N-terminal
lobe of a canonical eukaryotic kinase fold and has been shown to adopt
different conformations dependent on the enzyme’s activation
state.[17] To determine whether αC-helix
displacement is apparent in other CDK9 structures, we compared the
structures of CDK9/cyclin T (PDB id: 3BLQ(12)) and CDK9/cyclin
T/TAT (PDB id: 3MIA(14)). To analyze potential differences
in the position of the αC-helix we superimposed the two complexes
on their C-terminal kinase domains. As expected, we observed very
little difference in the conformations of the kinase C-terminal lobes
including the activation segment (rmsd 1.25 Å over all atoms
(Figure 3)). While the relative orientations
of the N- and C-terminal kinase lobes vary slightly between the two
structures, all catalytically important residues superpose well and
adopt the functionally relevant conformations as seen for other kinases,[18,19] indicating that both crystal structures represent active kinase
conformations. The N-terminal kinase lobes vary in the conformations
of the flexible regions (i.e., the glycine-rich loop
and the β3-αC loop) as well as in the position of the
αC-helix (Figure 3). As cyclin T associates
with CDK9 through the N-terminal kinase lobe and the αC-helix,
the repositioning of the αC-helix leads to a shift in the position
of the cyclin as described.[14] Taken together,
these observations suggest that the different conformations observed
for the αC-helix likely reflect the inherent flexibility of
this region of the protein.
Figure 3
Superposition of CDK9/cyclin TQ77R/E96G/F241L (PDB id: 3BLQ, green and brown)
and CDK9/cyclin T/TAT (PDB id: 3MIA, lilac and rose). Structures are represented
as cartoon models, with catalytically important residues as stick
models. The kinase subunits were superposed on their C-terminal kinase
domains (residues 111–315). TAT is omitted for clarity.
Superposition of CDK9/cyclin TQ77R/E96G/F241L (PDB id: 3BLQ, green and brown)
and CDK9/cyclin T/TAT (PDB id: 3MIA, lilac and rose). Structures are represented
as cartoon models, with catalytically important residues as stick
models. The kinase subunits were superposed on their C-terminal kinase
domains (residues 111–315). TAT is omitted for clarity.Our studies validate the use of CDK9/cyclin TQ77R/E96G/F241L for the determination of inhibitor co-crystal
structures. Our data
suggest that the increased overall flexibility of CDK9, particularly
in respect to the glycine-rich loop and the αC-helix conformations,
together with its more extended ATP binding pocket, offer an opportunity
to develop CDK9-specific inhibitors. Repositioning of the αC-helix
is a widely exploited mechanism by which the activities of protein
kinases are modulated.[18] However, it appears
that the particular flexibility apparent in CDK9 allows it to adopt
a conformation that optimizes the interactions that can be made by
CAN508. It will be important to determine if this mechanism for specificity
also discriminates between CDK9 and functionally related kinases such
as CDK12 and CDK13. Such discrimination would allow studies to dissect
the individual contributions of these CDKs in regulating transcription
and further the design of specific inhibitors to modulate the cellular
levels of anti-apoptotic factors.
Methods
Protein Purification, Crystallization, and Structure Determination
CDK9 (residues 1–330)/cyclin T (residues 1–259) and
CDK2/cyclin A complexes were prepared and crystallized as previously
described.[12,19] For structure determination of CDK9/cyclin T/CAN508 complexes, crystals
were soaked for
1 h to overnight in the crystallization condition saturated with CAN508
containing 18% glycerol and then cryo-cooled in liquid nitrogen. Purified
CDK2/cyclin A was incubated with 7.5
mM CAN508 for 30 min on ice, and the inhibitor complex was co-crystallized.
All structures were solved as described previously.[13]
Kinetic Analysis
To determine the IC50 values
toward CAN508, 10 ng of CDK9/cyclin T or CDK9/cyclin TF241L complex were incubated with 24 μg of GST-CTD in 10 μL
reactions containing 10 mM MgCl2, 50 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 100
μM ATP, 5 mM DTT, 0.2 μCi γ-32P-labeled
ATP, and increasing amounts of CAN508. Reactions were incubated for
5 min at 30 °C and terminated by the addition of SDS sample buffer. KMapp toward the ATP substrate were determined
under the same reaction conditions using 26 μg/mL GST-CTD. Samples
were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. Data were fitted with
GraphPad Prism version 5.02 (www.graphpad.com). Differential
scanning fluorimetry experiments were done as described previously.[13]
Authors: Xiangrui Liu; Shenhua Shi; Frankie Lam; Chris Pepper; Peter M Fischer; Shudong Wang Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2011-06-21 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Masoud Vedadi; Frank H Niesen; Abdellah Allali-Hassani; Oleg Y Fedorov; Patrick J Finerty; Gregory A Wasney; Ron Yeung; Cheryl Arrowsmith; Linda J Ball; Helena Berglund; Raymond Hui; Brian D Marsden; Pär Nordlund; Michael Sundstrom; Johan Weigelt; Aled M Edwards Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2006-10-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Sonja Baumli; Graziano Lolli; Edward D Lowe; Sonia Troiani; Luisa Rusconi; Alex N Bullock; Judit E Debreczeni; Stefan Knapp; Louise N Johnson Journal: EMBO J Date: 2008-06-19 Impact factor: 11.598
Authors: Shudong Wang; Gary Griffiths; Carol A Midgley; Anna L Barnett; Michael Cooper; Joanna Grabarek; Laura Ingram; Wayne Jackson; George Kontopidis; Steven J McClue; Campbell McInnes; Janice McLachlan; Christopher Meades; Mokdad Mezna; Iain Stuart; Mark P Thomas; Daniella I Zheleva; David P Lane; Robert C Jackson; David M Glover; David G Blake; Peter M Fischer Journal: Chem Biol Date: 2010-10-29
Authors: Natalia Jura; Xuewu Zhang; Nicholas F Endres; Markus A Seeliger; Thomas Schindler; John Kuriyan Journal: Mol Cell Date: 2011-04-08 Impact factor: 17.970
Authors: L T Lam; O K Pickeral; A C Peng; A Rosenwald; E M Hurt; J M Giltnane; L M Averett; H Zhao; R E Davis; M Sathyamoorthy; L M Wahl; E D Harris; J A Mikovits; A P Monks; M G Hollingshead; E A Sausville; L M Staudt Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2001-09-13 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Ahmed M Shawky; Nashwa A Ibrahim; Ashraf N Abdalla; Mohammed A S Abourehab; Ahmed M Gouda Journal: J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem Date: 2021-12 Impact factor: 5.051
Authors: Alison J Hole; Sonja Baumli; Hao Shao; Shenhua Shi; Shiliang Huang; Chris Pepper; Peter M Fischer; Shudong Wang; Jane A Endicott; Martin E Noble Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2013-01-29 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Hao Shao; Shenhua Shi; Shiliang Huang; Alison J Hole; Abdullahi Y Abbas; Sonja Baumli; Xiangrui Liu; Frankie Lam; David W Foley; Peter M Fischer; Martin Noble; Jane A Endicott; Chris Pepper; Shudong Wang Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2013-01-25 Impact factor: 7.446