| Literature DB >> 22291983 |
Jing Tao1, Min Chen, Shi-Xiang Zong, You-Qing Luo.
Abstract
Understanding factors responsible for structuring genetic diversity is of fundamental importance in evolutionary biology. The seabuckthorn carpenter moth (Holcocerus hippophaecolus Hua) is a native species throughout the north of China and is considered the main threat to seabuckthorn, Hippophae rhamnoides L. We assessed the influence of outbreaks, environmental factors and host species in shaping the genetic variation and structure of H. hippophaecolus by using Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) markers. We rejected the hypothesis that outbreak-associated genetic divergence exist, as evidenced by genetic clusters containing a combination of populations from historical outbreak areas, as well as non-outbreak areas. Although a small number of markers (4 of 933 loci) were identified as candidates under selection in response to population densities. H. hippophaecolus also did not follow an isolation-by-distance pattern. We rejected the hypothesis that outbreak and drought events were driving the genetic structure of H. hippophaecolus. Rather, the genetic structure appears to be influenced by various confounding bio-geographical factors. There were detectable genetic differences between H. hippophaecolus occupying different host trees from within the same geographic location. Host-associated genetic divergence should be confirmed by further investigation.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22291983 PMCID: PMC3265495 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030544
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Geographical location, average annual rainfall, and hosts for populations of H. hippophaecolus.
| No. | Location | Coordinates | Average annual rainfall/mm | Population indentifier | Host plant | Sample Size |
| 1 | Liaoning,Jianping | 119.71E/41.84N | 478.37 | JPS |
| 26 |
| JPY |
| 7 | ||||
| JPX |
| 8 | ||||
| JPL |
| 9 | ||||
| 2 | Inner mongolia,Linxi | 118.23E/43.61N | 378.98 | LX |
| 16 |
| 3 | Hebei,Fengning | 116.61E/41.21N | 535.16 | FN |
| 25 |
| 4 | Shanxi,Youyu | 112.39E/39.96N | 377.24 | YY |
| 26 |
| 5 | Inner mongolia,Dongsheng | 111.25E/39.87N | 410.52 | DS |
| 15 |
| 6 | Shanxi,Wuzhai | 111.87E/38.88N | 431.54 | WZ |
| 18 |
| 7 | Shanxi,Yulin | 109.76E/38.28N | 397.43 | YL |
| 19 |
| 8 | Shanxi,Wuqi | 108.26E/36.90N | 534.83 | WQ |
| 29 |
| 9 | Nixia,Yanchi | 107.48E/37.89N | 290.24 | YC |
| 22 |
| 10 | Nixia,Pengyang | 106.50E/35.82N | 498.67 | PY |
| 21 |
Figure 1Locations of 10 H. hippophaecolus sites with known outbreak (star) or non-outbreak (circle) patterns.
Outbreak patterns based on Luo et al. [16], population 1; Wang [26], poulation 4; Zhou [15], population 5; You [27], population 7; Zong et al. [17] population 10; Zong, personal communication, population 2,3,6,7,9. Identities and locations of populations see Table 1.
Percentage of polymorphic loci (%P) and Nei's heteozygosity of H. hippophaecolus populations.
| Population indentifier | ||||||||||
| JP | LX | FN | YY | DS | WZ | YL | WQ | YC | PY | |
|
| 72.56 | 51.23 | 77.60 | 58.41 | 74.49 | 68.27 | 70.85 | 66.34 | 56.38 | 61.74 |
|
| 0.1854 | 0.1529 | 0.1702 | 0.1495 | 0.2042 | 0.1505 | 0.1872 | 0.1749 | 0.1604 | 0.1679 |
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) of H. hippophaecolus populations.
| Source of variation | d.f. | SS | Percentage of variation (%) | P |
|
| ||||
| Among localities | 9 | 5831.247 | 22.54 | <0.0001 |
| Individuals within localities | 206 | 18395.396 | 77.46 | <0.0001 |
|
| ||||
| Among host plants in Jianping | 3 | 1537.343 | 31.73 | <0.0001 |
| Individuals within host plants in Jianping | 30 | 3895.897 | 68.27 | <0.0001 |
| Among two host groups in Jianping | 1 | 1249.317 | 34.82 | <0.0001 |
| Individuals within groups in Jianping | 48 | 4183.923 | 65.18 | <0.0001 |
Figure 2Neighbor-joining phenogram of Nei's genetic distances between H. hippophaecolus populations at different collection sites.
Site names and outbreak patterns correspond to those in figure 1. Populations are depicted as outbreaking (star) or non-outbreaking (circle).
Figure 3Result of Dfdist analyses in Mcheza.
FST against heterozygosity plot is provided. Loci were identified as significant, corresponding to a 99% critical frequency and 99.5% confidence interval. Red and yellow lines represent 0.995th and 0.005th quantiles of the conditional distribution obtained from Dfdist simulations respectively. Each blue dot indicates AFLP marker; dots in gray areas represent neutral loci falling below the 0.995 quantile's broad line, whereas outlier loci in red areas are pointed out by arrows and accompanied by the locus number.
Nei's genetic distance and F value between all geographic combinations.
| PY | JP | YY | WQ | DS | YL | WZ | YC | LX | FN | |
| PY | — | 0.0902 | 0.2409 | 0.0683 | 0.1589 | 0.2179 | 0.2929 | 0.2779 | 0.2601 | 0.2298 |
| JP | 0.0191 | — | 0.2682 | 0.0856 | 0.1969 | 0.2204 | 0.2978 | 0.2754 | 0.2737 | 0.2467 |
| YY | 0.0465 | 0.0587 | — | 0.2654 | 0.1115 | 0.2938 | 0.3663 | 0.3477 | 0.1047 | 0.2715 |
| WQ | 0.0170 | 0.0196 | 0.0583 | — | 0.1813 | 0.2048 | 0.2914 | 0.2404 | 0.2856. | 0.2454 |
| DS | 0.0401 | 0.0442 | 0.0423 | 0.0468 | — | 0.1550 | 0.1828 | 0.2511 | 0.1089 | 0.0986 |
| YL | 0.0530 | 0.0559 | 0.0888 | 0.0527 | 0.0362 | — | 0.1129 | 0.1642 | 0.2520 | 0.1298 |
| WZ | 0.0816 | 0.0780 | 0.1247 | 0.0869 | 0.0375 | 0.0254 | — | 0.2998 | 0.3131 | 0.0424 |
| YC | 0.0538 | 0.0541 | 0.0774 | 0.0447 | 0.0617 | 0.0437 | 0.0871 | — | 0.3387 | 0.2819 |
| LX | 0.0456 | 0.0578 | 0.0209 | 0.0606 | 0.0343 | 0.0678 | 0.0944 | 0.0731 | — | 0.2126 |
| FN | 0.0669 | 0.0652 | 0.0969 | 0.0740 | 0.0207 | 0.0298 | 0.0062 | 0.0827 | 0.0705 | — |
Nei's genetic distances are below the diagonal. F value and their significance level are above the diagonal. Significance level of associated F value are shown as:
*0.01
Pairwise comparisons of genetic divergence estimates (F) between all host plants combinations.
| JPY | JPL | JPX | JPS | |
| JPY | 0.00000 | |||
| JPL | 0.07590 | 0.00000 | ||
| JPX | 0.05271 | 0.11808 | 0.00000 | |
| JPS | 0.36080 | 0.37730 | 0.35109 | 0.00000 |
Significance level of associated F value are shown as:
*0 01
**0.001
***P<0.0001.